切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (01) : 19 -24. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2013.01.004

所属专题: 文献

实验研究

套式聚合酶链式反应在疟原虫检测和分型中的应用研究
徐超1, 魏庆宽1, 李瑾1, 肖婷1, 王用斌1, 孔祥礼1, 张本光1, 魏艳彬1, 赵长磊1, 黄炳成1,()   
  1. 1. 272033 济宁,山东省医学科学院,山东省寄生虫病防治研究所,山东省疟疾诊断参比实验室
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-06 出版日期:2013-11-26
  • 通信作者: 黄炳成
  • 基金资助:
    中国全球基金疟疾项目(201201055); 山东省自然科学基金(2012 ZRC03040)

Application of nested PCR for malaria parasite detection and classification

Chao Xu1, Qingkuan Wei1, Jin Li1, Ting Xiao1, Yongbin Wang1, Xiangli Kong1, Benguang Zhang1, yanbin Wei1, Changlei Zhao1, Bingcheng Huang1,()   

  1. 1. Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Shandong Provincial Reference Laboratory for Malaria Diagnosis, Jining, 272033, China
  • Received:2013-10-06 Published:2013-11-26
  • Corresponding author: Bingcheng Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding auther: Huang Bingcheng, Email:
引用本文:

徐超, 魏庆宽, 李瑾, 肖婷, 王用斌, 孔祥礼, 张本光, 魏艳彬, 赵长磊, 黄炳成. 套式聚合酶链式反应在疟原虫检测和分型中的应用研究[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2013, 01(01): 19-24.

Chao Xu, Qingkuan Wei, Jin Li, Ting Xiao, Yongbin Wang, Xiangli Kong, Benguang Zhang, yanbin Wei, Changlei Zhao, Bingcheng Huang. Application of nested PCR for malaria parasite detection and classification[J]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2013, 01(01): 19-24.

目的

比较疟疾病例样本套式PCR检测和传统镜检结果,探讨套式PCR在疟疾诊断中的应用价值。

方法

采集疟疾患者血样,分别涂制厚、薄血膜用于常规镜检;抗凝血或滤纸血用于提取疟原虫DNA等。按要求设计属种等多套引物,应用套式PCR扩增感染人的4种疟原虫目的基因片段,将检测结果与镜检结果进行比较分析,并对目的片段进行测序鉴定等。

结果

259份血样,套式PCR共检测出恶性疟187例、间日疟45例、卵形疟8例和三日疟1例,阴性10例。其中恶性疟阳性检出率最高(75.10%),间日疟阳性检出率次之(18.07%),还检测到混合感染血样8份(3.21%)。与GenBank标准序列对比显示,扩增片段大小及测序结果均完全正确,显示套式PCR在分型上比传统镜检更客观。套式PCR检测与传统镜检结果比较显示,前者阳性率(96.14%)明显高于后者(90.73%),并且差异具有统计学意义(χ2=12.07,P<0.05)。

结论

套式PCR法检测疟原虫具有较高敏感性和特异性,且适用于疟原虫混合感染,在疟疾病例诊断和分型方面均具有良好的应用前景。

Objective

To compare the performance of nested PCR assay with traditional microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained blood films and to discuss the value of nested PCR application for the diagnosis of malaria.

Methods

Blood samples were collected from affiliated hospital of Shandong Institute of Parasitic Diseases and 17 cities′ CDC reported cases in Shandong province. Finger prick blood samples were taken from each participating individual and used to prepare Giemsa-stained thick and thin blood films for traditional microscopy. Anticoagulant or filter paper blood samples were used to extract DNA from malaria parasites.Primers of plasmodium genus-species were designed on the basis of conserved sequence on 18S small subunit ribosomal RNA(SSU rRNA). Nested PCR was applied to the amplification of target gene segments on 4 kinds of plasmodium infected human. The results of PCR were compared with microscopy and were processed by statistical analysis (chi-square test). The target fragments of PCR amplification were used for species identification and compared with the standard sequence registered in Genbank.

Results

Among the 259 samples, 249 had been detected positive for malaria parasites by nested PCR. The electrophoresis banding size of 187 samples were 205bp, identified as plasmodium falciparum. The electrophoresis banding size of 45 samples were 120bp, identified as plasmodium vivax.The electrophoresis banding size of 8 samples were 800bp, identified as plasmodium ovale. The electrophoresis banding size of 1 sample was 144bp, identified as plasmodium malariae. No species amplification bands were found in 10 samples, identified as negative. Plasmodium falciparum occupied the highest detection rate of positive samples (75.10%) and plasmodium vivax occupied the second highest detection rate of positive samples (18.07%), in addition, 8 mixed infection were detected (3.21%). PCR products of 5 plasmodium falciparum, 5 plasmodium vivax, 4 plasmodium ovale and 1 plasmodium malariae were sequencing and compared with standard sequence registered in Genbank by blast.The comparison results showed that fragments size and product sequence was in accordance with the reference. Microscopy results showed that 171 samples were plasmodium falciparum, 60 samples were plasmodium vivax, 4 samples were plasmodium ovale, 24 samples were negative. Species proportion of microscopy results were similar to nested PCR, plasmodium falciparum occupied the highest detection rate of positive samples (72.77%), plasmodium vivax occupied the second highest detection rate of positive samples (25.53%). However, there was no plasmodium malariae and mixed infection samples detected by microscopy. Nested PCR were compared with traditional microscopy and the results showed that consistent rate of detected samples between 2 methods was 84.56%.But nested PCR positive rate(96.14%) was significantly higher than traditional microscopy(90.73%), the difference between 2 groups had statistical significance (χ2=12.07, P<0.05). Fourteen samples were detected positive by nested PCR but negative by microscopic examination.Ten samples were detected negative by the both methods.It was worth noting that no samples detected positive by microscopic examination but negative by nested PCR.Furthermore, all 4 kinds of plasmodium species and mixed infection were detected by nested PCR but only 3 kinds of plasmodium species without mixed infection were detected by traditional microscopic examination.The results showed that nested PCR was more objective than the traditional microscopy in malaria parasites′ classification.

Conclusions

The results indicate that nested PCR used for detection of malaria parasites with high sensitivity and specificity and capable of identifying malaria parasites at the species level when microscopy is equivocal. Nested PCR is also suitable for the mixed infection of malaria parasites and has a broad application prospect in the study of diagnosis and molecular epidemiology of malaria cases.

图1 Pv和Pf阳性电泳图
图2 Po阳性电泳图
图3 Pv和Pf混合感染阳性电泳图
图4 Pm阳性电泳图
表1 套式PCR与镜检法检测疟疾血样本结果比较(例数)
表2 套式PCR与镜检法阳性检出率的比较(例数)
图5 4种疟原虫PCR产物序列峰图
[1]
张本光,赵长磊,卜秀芹, 等. 山东省疟疾高发地区发病率与气象因子的多元逐步回归分析[J]. 中国人兽共患病学报, 2013, 29(3): 257-261.
[2]
唐克香,杨恒林. 疟疾病原学检测研究进展[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2011, 6(9): 694-696.
[3]
Moody A. Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria parasites[J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2002, 15(1): 66-78.
[4]
吴英松,江晓玲,李明, 等. 聚合酶链反应检测疟疾的研究[J]. 热带医学杂志, 2001, 1(1): 50-52.
[5]
钱嘉. 聚合酶链反应技术与镜检法诊断问日疟的对比研究[J]. 中国寄生虫病防治杂志, 2003, 16(2): 93-95.
[6]
Coleman R E,Sattabongkot J,Promstaporm S, et al. Comparison of PCR and microscopy for the detection of asymptomatic malaria in a Plasmodium falciparum/vivax endemic area in Thailand[J]. Malaria J, 2006, 5(1): 121.
[7]
Myjak P,Nahorski W,Pieniazek N, et al. Usefulness of PCR for diagnosis of imported malaria in Poland[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2002, 21(3): 215-218.
[8]
Snounou G,Viriyakosol S,Zhu X P, et al. High sensitivity of detection of human malaria parasites by the use of nested polymerase chain reaction[J]. Mol Biochem Parasitol, 1993, 61(2): 315-320.
[9]
Johnston S P,Pieniazek N J,Xayavong M V, et al. PCR as a confirmatory technique for laboratory diagnosis of malaria[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2006, 44(3): 1087-1089.
[10]
郑灿军,张倩,李华忠. 2005-2008年我国疟疾病例诊断和报告情况分析[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2010, 14(6): 507-509.
[11]
肖婷,魏艳彬,刘凡, 等. 山东省2例输入性卵形疟病例报告[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2012, 7(6): 10004-10004.
[12]
Snounou G,Viriyakosol S,Jarra W, et al. Identification of the four human malaria parasite species in field samples by the polymerase chain reaction and detection of a high prevalence of mixed infections[J]. Mol Biochem Parasitol, 1993, 58(2): 283-292.
[13]
Siripoon N,Snounou G,Yamogkul P, et al. Cryptic Plasmodium falciparum parasites in clinical P. vivax blood samples from Thailand[J]. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 2002, 96(1): 70-71.
[14]
Scopel K K,Fontes C J,Nunes Á C, et al. Low sensitivity of nested PCR using Plasmodium DNA extracted from stained thick blood smears: an epidemiological retrospective study among subjects with low parasitaemia in an endemic area of the Brazilian Amazon region[J]. Malaria J, 2004, 31(3): 8-13.
[15]
Jelinek T,Proll S,HESS E, et al. Geographic differences in the sensitivity of a polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Plasmodium falciparum infection[J]. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1996, 55(6): 647-651.
[16]
López C,Saravia C,Gomez A, et al. Mechanisms of genetically-based resistance to malaria[J]. Gene, 2010, 467(1-2): 1-12.
[17]
Ohrt C,Sutamihardja M A,Purno mo, et al. Impact of microscopy error on estimates of protective efficacy in malaria-prevention trials[J]. J Infect Dis, 2002, 186(4): 540-546.
[1] 李硕, 梁晓宁, 卢瑞刚, 刘翠霞, 张岩, 郭瑞君. 超声生物显微镜在不同时期银屑病患者皮肤中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2016, 13(04): 262-265.
[2] 李硕, 梁晓宁, 张岩, 刘翠霞, 黄雅丽, 卢瑞刚, 郭瑞君. 超声生物显微镜在正常人及银屑病患者皮肤研究中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(1): 30-34.
[3] 段浩, 金泽亚, 孙彬, 刘政, 钟宗雨, 何飞. 人股骨头表面微观形貌的表征提取及分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 58-63,98.
[4] 高学松, 郭江, 段雪飞. 疟疾患者炎症指标变化特点及临床意义[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 240-243.
[5] 邹蕊, 滕蕊, 王译婕, 董少杰, 张辉, 李晓红, 牛林. 增龄性变化对牙本质微观结构与力学特性的影响[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(06): 341-345.
[6] 廖远泉. 输入性卵形疟原虫感染实验诊断技术的研究进展[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 242-247.
[7] 李瑾, 徐超, 魏庆宽, 肖婷, 孔祥礼, 王用斌, 张本光, 魏艳彬, 赵长磊, 黄炳成. 套式聚合酶链式反应诊断三日疟原虫感染的临床应用[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2014, 02(04): 270-274.
阅读次数
全文


摘要