切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (03) : 206 -209. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2014.03.010

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

培养阴性腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎的实验室指标及预后分析
张宜明1, 刘雷1, 孟雪1, 魏明明1, 王栋1, 张昆1, 曲小菡1, 李新建1,()   
  1. 1. 272029 济宁医学院附属医院肾内科
  • 收稿日期:2014-02-16 出版日期:2014-08-26
  • 通信作者: 李新建
  • 基金资助:
    国家"十二五"科技支撑计划项目(2011BAI10B08)

Clinic diagnosis and treatment of culture-negative peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients

Yiming Zhang1, Lei Liu1, Xue Meng1, Mingming Wei1, Dong Wang1, Kun Zhang1, Xiaohan Qu1, Xinjian Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Nephrology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College, Jining 272029, China
  • Received:2014-02-16 Published:2014-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Xinjian Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Xinjian, Email:
引用本文:

张宜明, 刘雷, 孟雪, 魏明明, 王栋, 张昆, 曲小菡, 李新建. 培养阴性腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎的实验室指标及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2014, 02(03): 206-209.

Yiming Zhang, Lei Liu, Xue Meng, Mingming Wei, Dong Wang, Kun Zhang, Xiaohan Qu, Xinjian Li. Clinic diagnosis and treatment of culture-negative peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2014, 02(03): 206-209.

目的

探讨培养阴性腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎(CNP)的临床特征及治疗体会。

方法

2008年1月至2012年12月收治的腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎(PDAP)患者56例,回顾性分析CNP患者的病史、化验室指标、病原菌、治疗方式及转归,并与同期收治的革兰氏阳性(G)球菌、革兰阴性(G)杆菌腹膜炎进行分组比较。采用SPSS 15.0软件包进行统计学处理,两组血清不同致病菌PDAP患者血清血红蛋白、白蛋白水平及腹膜透析液白细胞计数采用均数±标准差表示,显著性比较采用t检验,治疗的疗效、近期抗生素使用史及合并症发生率的比较用χ2检验。

结果

56例PDAP中CNP组21例,G球菌组24例,G杆菌组11例;CNP组有较高的近期抗生素使用史(23.8%);3组患者在腹膜透析液白细胞计数[(2486.9±2576.4)×106/L,(3017.5±1979.4)×106/L,(2526.7±509.7)×106/L,F=0.185,P>0.05]、近期抗生素使用率(23.5%,4.2%,9.0%, χ2=4.48,P>0.05)、合并出口/皮下隧道感染(4.8%,4.2%,0%,χ2=0.5,P>0.05)方面均差异无统计学意义;CNP组血红蛋白(78.2±11.9)g/L最低,与G球菌组(89.5±16.5)g/L(LSD-t=11.26,P<0.05)及G杆菌组(89.1±15.8)g/L(LSD-t=10.95,P<0.05)比较,组间差异有统计学意义。CNP组血白蛋白(25.1±4.1)g/L最低,与G球菌组(31.5±7.5)g/L(LSD-t=6.32,P<0.05)及G杆菌组(32.5±6.7)g/L(LSD-t=7.31,P<0.05)组比较,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在疗效方面,CNP组患者有较低的完全治愈率(66.7%),较高的拔管率(9.5%)、复发率(23.8%),但3组间初始应答率(81%,87.5%,90.9%,χ2=1.68,P>0.05)、完全治愈率(66.7%,75.0%,81.8%,χ2=1.12,P>0.05)、拔管率(9.5%,4.2%,0%,χ2=1.4,P>0.05)、复发率(23.8%,8.3%,0%,χ2=4.42,P>0.05),差异无统计学意义。

结论

培养阴性腹膜炎的产生与近期抗生素使用无关,其有较重的营养不良;且完全治愈率低,拔管率及复发率均较高,提示其预后相对较差。

Objective

To investigate the treatment experiences and clinic features of culture-negative peritonitis(CNP) in peritoneal dialysis(PD) patients.

Methods

CNP episodes were reviewed retrospectively in our medical center from January 2008 to December 2012.The clinical manifestations, laboratory indicators, pathogenic bacteria, treatment, recovery rate, extubation rate, and relapse rate were analyzed and compared with those of gram positive and gram negative bacterial peritonitis.Comparing of curative effect, history of previous antibiotics treatment and the incidence of complications were analyzed by chi-squart test.

Results

Fifty-six patients with peritoneal dialysis-associateel peritonitis (PDAP) were reviewed.There were 21 cases with CNP, 24 episodes with gram positive and 11 episodes with gram negative bacterial peritonitis in the 56 cases.CNP group had a much higher history of previous antibiotic treatment (23.8%). There were no significant differences in the white blood cell (WBC) count of dialysate (2486.9±2576.4×106/L, 3017.5±1979.4×106/L, 2526.7±509.7×106/L, F=0.185, P>0.05), history of previous antibiotic treatment (23.5%, 4.2%, 9.0%, χ2=4.48, P>0.05), the combined infection of export/subcutaneous tunnel (4.8%, 4.2%, 0.0%, χ2=0.5, P>0.05) of the three groups.CNP group had lower hemoglobin(78.2±11.9)g/L, compared with gram positive group(89.5±16.5)g/L(LSD-t=11.26, P<0.05) and gram negative group(89.1±15.8)g/L(LSD-t=10.95, P<0.05), and there were significant differences among the three groups.At the same time, CNP group had lower serum albumin(25.1±4.1)g/L, compared with gram positive group(31.5±7.5)g/L(LSD-t=6.32, P<0.05) and gram negative group(32.5±6.7)g/L(LSD-t=7.31, P<0.05), and there were significant differences among the three groups.In the therapeutic effect, CNP group had lower complete cure rate(66.7%), higher catheter removal rate(9.5%), relapse rate(23.8%). There were no significant differences in overall primary response rate(81%, 87.5%, 90.9%, χ2=1.68, P>0.05), the complete cure rate(66.7%, 75%, 81.8%, χ2=1.12, P>0.05), the catheter removal rate(9.5%, 4.2%, 0.0%, χ2=1.4, P>0.05) and relapse rate (23.8%, 8.3%, 0%, χ2=4.42, P>0.05)among the three groups.

Conclusions

The appearance of CNP may not be associated with history of previous antibiotic treatment.CNP has severe malnutrition, lower complete cure rate, higher catheter removal rate and catheter removal rate, suggesting a bad prognosis.

表1 腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎患者腹膜透析液病菌的培养结果比较
表2 不同致病菌腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎患者血清血红蛋白、白蛋白水平及腹膜透析液白细胞计数比较(±s)
[1]
Mactier R.Peritonitis is still the achilles heel of peritoneal dialysis[J].Perit Dial Int,2009,29(3):262-266.
[2]
Li PK, Szeto CC, Piraino B,et al.Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations:2010 update[J].Perit Dial Int,2010,30(4):393-423.
[3]
Szeto CC, Kwan BC, Chow KM,et al.Repeat peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis:retrospective review of 181 consecutive cases[J].Clin J Am Soc Nephrol,2011,6(4):827-833.
[4]
陈芳,董骏武,熊飞.培养阴性腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎的预后探讨[J].中国中西医结合肾病杂志,2011,12(6):519-521.
[5]
Chen KH, Chang CT, Weng SM,et al.Culture-negative peritonitis:a fifteen-year review[J].Ren Fail,2007,29(2):177-181.
[6]
Lee YJ, Cho AJ, Lee JE,et al.Evolving appendicitis presenting as culture-negative peritonitis with minimal symptoms in a patient on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis[J].Ren Fail,2010,32(7):884-887.
[7]
朱伟平,崔彤霞,徐庆东,等.腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎的菌谱极其药敏分析[J].中国血液净化,2011,10(7):357-359.
[8]
潘祥林,王鸿利.诊断学的任务与发展方向[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2013,1(1):8-9.
[9]
No authors listed.Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis:association with clinical outcome.Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group[J]. Am J Nephrol,1996,7(9):198-207.
[10]
Fahim M, Hawley CM, McDonald SP,et al.Culture-negative peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis in Australia:prediction,treatment,and outcomes in 435 cases[J].Am J Kidney Dis,2010,55(4):690-697.
[11]
Lam MF, Tang BS, Tse KC,et al.Ampicillin-sulbactam and amikacin used as second-line antibiotics for patients with culture-negative peritonitis[J].Perit Dial Int,2008,28(5):540-542.
[12]
Yoo TH, Chang KH, Ryu DR,et al.Usefulness of 23S rRNA amplification by PCR in the detection of bacteria in CAPD peritonitis[J].Am J Nephrol,2006,26(2):115-120.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 王涛, 刘静, 高玉伟, 王兴华, 胡秀红, 崔红蕊, 徐保振, 杨洪娟. 抗生素耐药背景下中医药防治腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 340-344.
[6] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[7] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[8] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[9] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[10] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[11] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[12] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
[13] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[14] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[15] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
阅读次数
全文


摘要