切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (04) : 279 -284. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2014.04.009

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

造影剂剂量与估计肾小球滤过率比值对高龄糖尿病患者造影剂肾病的诊断价值
刘雷1, 石莉,1, 张宜明1, 王彦富2, 李新建1, 李清贤2   
  1. 1. 272029 济宁医学院附属医院肾内科
    2. 272029 济宁医学院附属医院心内科
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-15 出版日期:2014-11-26
  • 通信作者: 石莉
  • 基金资助:
    山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(2011BJYB20)

The diagnostic value of the ratio of contrast medium volume to estimated glomerular filtration rate in contrast-induced nephropathy diabetics patients

Lei Liu1, Li Shi,1, Yiming Zhang1, Yanfu Wang2, Xinjian Li1, Qingxian Li2   

  1. 1. Department of Nephrology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College, Jining 272029, China
  • Received:2014-06-15 Published:2014-11-26
  • Corresponding author: Li Shi
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Shi Li, Email:
引用本文:

刘雷, 石莉, 张宜明, 王彦富, 李新建, 李清贤. 造影剂剂量与估计肾小球滤过率比值对高龄糖尿病患者造影剂肾病的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2014, 02(04): 279-284.

Lei Liu, Li Shi, Yiming Zhang, Yanfu Wang, Xinjian Li, Qingxian Li. The diagnostic value of the ratio of contrast medium volume to estimated glomerular filtration rate in contrast-induced nephropathy diabetics patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2014, 02(04): 279-284.

目的

探讨经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后造影剂肾病(CIN)的发病情况;评估造影剂剂量(CMV)与估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)比值对高龄糖尿病患者造影剂肾病的诊断价值。

方法

回顾性分析875例在济宁医学院附属医院心内科接受PCI患者的临床资料。采用SPSS19.0统计软件进行统计学分析,比较CIN组与非CIN组患者的各项资料,如性别、年龄、吸烟、是否低血压、左室射血分数(LVEF)、血红蛋白值、低密度脂蛋白(LDL-C)、空腹血糖、高血压和2型糖尿病病史;术前血肌酐(Scr)、eGFR;术后48hScr、eGFR。用Logistic回归分析CIN的危险因素。

结果

入组患者CIN患病率4.80%(42例),男性、合并高血压病、2型糖尿病、高脂血症、吸烟、低血压、贫血、发病时心肌梗死合并休克的患病率分别为65.71%、54.86%、37.26%、22.51%、34.17%、16.80%、4.20%、8.91%。CIN与非CIN患者相比,在高龄患者(33.33%,19.33%,χ2=4.902,P<0.05)、患有糖尿病(52.38%,36.49%,χ2=4.317,P<0.05),吸烟(50.00%,33.37%,χ2=4.914,P<0.05),发病时低血压(28.57%,16.21%,χ2=4.374,P<0.05),心肌梗死伴休克(19.05%,8.40%,χ2=5.579,P<0.05),低LVEF[(36.46±9.27)%,(43.62±3.46)%,t=2.398,P<0.05]及造影剂用量大[(154.5±95.3)mL,(115.04±49.63)mL,t=2.069,P<0.05]的患者更容易发生CIN;eGFR在CIN组明显降低[(72.50±15.06)mL/(min·1.73m2),(108.55±21.7)mL/(min·1.73m2),t=7.220,P<0.05]。CMV/eGFR在CIN组与非CIN组间[(2.19±1.30),(1.01±0.40),t= -3.439,P<0.05]差异有统计学意义。多因素回归分析显示高龄(年龄≥70岁,RR=5.27,P<0.05)、糖尿病(RR=9.87,P<0.05)、LVEF(RR=7.35,P<0.05)、术前eGFR(RR=4.12,P<0.05)、心肌梗死合并休克(RR=6.75,P<0.05)、CMV/eGFR(RR=13.45,P<0.05)是CIN的危险因素。ROC工作曲线显示,CMV/eGFR>1.52对于高龄糖尿病患者是否发生CIN的敏感度为72.50%,特异度为84.00%。

结论

PCI前评估患者的危险因素非常重要,高龄糖尿病更容易发生CIN;CMV/eGFR比值是一个独立的能够预测高龄糖尿病患者PCI后能否发生CIN的指标。

Objective

To investigate the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy(CIN) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) and assess the predictive role of the ratio of contrast medium volume to estimated glomerular filtration rate (CMV/eGFR) in super-elderly diabetic patients undergoing elective PCI who developed CIN.

Methods

Eight hundred and seventy-five PCI patients were retrospectively collected in Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University.Patients were divided into CIN group and non-CIN group based on the presence of CIN.Date of the two groups were compared concerning sex, age, smoking, hypotension, LVEF, hemoglobin, LDL-C, glucose, history of hypertension and type 2 diabetes, serum creatinine and eGFR pre-PCI, serum creatinine and eGFR post 48 h-PCI.Risk factors for CIN were analyzed by logistic regression statistical model.

Results

Among eight hundred and seventy-five patients, forty-two patients experienced CIN (4.8%). The disease incidence of male, hypertention, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, hypotentino, anemia, myocardial infarction with shock was 65.71%, 54.86%, 37.26%, 22.51%, 34.17%, 16.80%, 4.20%, 8.91%, respectively.In the other two groups, the patients with the super-elderly (age≥70y) (33.33%, 19.33%, χ2=4.902, P<0.05), type 2 diabetes(52.38%, 36.49%, χ2=4.317, P=0.05), smoking(50.00%, 33.37%, χ2=4.914, P<0.05), with hypotention(28.57%, 16.21%, χ2=4.374, P<0.05), myocardial infarction combined with shock(19.05%, 8.40%, χ2=5.579, P<0.05), LVEF[(36.46±9.27)%, (43.62±3.46)%, t=2.398, P<0.05], and larger contrast medium volume[(154.5±95.3)mL, (115.04±49.63)mL, t=2.069, P<0.05] were proned to CIN.eGFR was lower in CIN[(72.50±15.06)ml/(min·1.73m2), (108.55±21.7)ml/(min·1.73m2), t=7.220, P<0.05]. There were significant differences between the two group in CMV/eGFR[(2.19±1.30), (1.01±0.40), t=-3.439, P<0.05]. Logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥70y(RR=5.27, P<0.05), type 2 diabetes(RR=9.87, P<0.05), LVEF(RR=7.35, P<0.05), pre-PCI eGFR(RR=4.12, P<0.05), myocardial infarction with shock(RR=6.75, P<0.05), CMV/eGFR(RR=13.45, P<0.05)were the risk factors for CIN. ROC analysis indicated that a CMV/eGFR of more than 1.5 was a predictor of CIN.The sensitivity and specificity for CIN of CMV/eGFR of more than 1.5 was 72.50% and 84.00%, respectively.

Conclusions

It is very important to estimate risk factors of patients before PCI.The super-elderly diabetic patients are proned to CIN.The CMV/eGFR ratio could be a valuable predictor for CIN in super-elderly diabetic patients after elective PCI.

表1 CIN组与非CIN组患者临床特征比较
表2 发生CIN的多因素Logistic回归分析
图1 造影剂剂量与估计肾小球滤过率比值在高龄糖尿病患者中的预测价值
[1]
Nash K, Hafeez A, Hou S.Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency[J].Am J Kidney Dis,2002,39(5):930-936.
[2]
Parfrey P.The clinical epidemiology of contrast-induced nephropathy[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2005,28(Suppl 2):S3-S11.
[3]
Dangas G, Iakovou I, Nikolsky E,et al.Contras-induced nephropaty after percutanetous in relation to chronic kidney disease and hemodynamic variables[J].Am J Cardiol,2005,95(1):13-19.
[4]
Manske CL, Sprafka JM, Strony JT,et al.Contrast nephropathy in azotemic diabetic patients undergoing coronary angiography [J].Am J Med,1990,89(5):615-620.
[5]
De Broe ME, Porter GA, Bennett WM,et al.Clinical nephrotoxins:renal injury from drugs and chemicals[M].Kluwer Academic Publishers,2003.
[6]
Nozue T, Michishita I, Iwaki T,et al.Contrast medium volume to estimated glomerular filtration rate ratio as a predictor of contrast-induced nephropathy developing after elective percutaneous coronary intervention[J].J Cardiol,2009,54(2):214-220.
[7]
Mehran R, Nikolsky E.Contrast-induced nephropathy:definition,epidemiology,and patients at risk[J].Kidney Int Suppl,2006,100:S11-S15.
[8]
Chong E, Poh KK, Liang S,et al.Risk fractors and clinical outcomes for contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with normal serum creatinine[J].Ann Acad Med Singapore,2010,39(5):374-380.
[9]
Wang XC, Fu XH, Wang YB,et al.Prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy in diabetics undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention:role of the ratio of contrast medium volume to estimated glomerular filtration rate[J].Chin Med J (Engl),2011,124(6):892-896.
[10]
Ma YC, Zuo L, Chen JH,et al.Modified glomerular filtration rate estimating equation for Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease[J].J Am Soc Nephrol, 2006,17(10):2937-2944.
[11]
Liistro F, Falsini G, Bolognese L.The clinical burden of contrast media-induced nephropathy [J].Ital Heart J,2003,4(10):668-676.
[12]
张洁,赵建华,王志英,等.高龄人造影剂肾病临床相关因素及预防措施[J].中华保健医学杂志,2009,11(4):286-288.
[13]
Mueller C, Buerkle G, Buet tner HJ,et al.Prevention of contrast media-associated nephropathy:randomized comparison of 2 hydration regimens in 1620 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty [J].Arch Intern Med,2002,162(3):329-336.
[14]
Esplugas E, Cequier A, Gomes-Hospital JA,et al.Comparative tolerability of contrast media used for coronary interventions[J].Drug Saf,2002,25(15):1079-1098.
[15]
Nguyen SA, Suranyi P, Ravenel JG,et al.Iso-osmolality versus low-osmolality iodinated contrast medium at intravenous cont rast-enhanced CT:effect on kidney function[J].Radiology,2008,248(1):97-105.
[16]
Toprak O, Cirit M, Yesil M,et al.Metabolic syndrome as a risk factor for contrast-induced nephropathy in non-diabetic elderly patients with renal impairment[J].Kidney Blood Press Res,2006,29(1):2-9.
[17]
Zhang Pian, Ni Zhaohui, Wang Ling,et al.A Multi-center clinical study of contrast-induced nephropathy in inpatients in cardiology department after coronary artery intervention[J].Chinese Journal of Blood Purification,2010,9(7):375-370.
[18]
Bartholomew BA, Harjai KJ, Dukkipati S,et al.Impact of nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention and a method for risk stratification[J].Am J Cardiol,2004,93(12):1515-1519.
[19]
Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Turcot D,et al.Impact of chronic kidney disease on prognosis of patients with diabetes mellitus treated with percutaneouscoronary intervention[J].Am J Cardiol, 2004,94(3):300-305.
[20]
Asif A, Preston RA, Roth D.Radiocontrast-induced nephropathy[J].Am J Ther,2003,10(2):137-147.
[21]
Rubenstein MH, Sheynberg BV, Harrell LC,et al.Effectiveness and adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with mild versus severe renal failure[J].Am J Cardiol,2001,87(7):856-860.
[22]
郭敏,邹阳春.造影剂肾病研究进展[J].中华高龄多器官疾病杂志,2010,9(3):286-288.
[23]
Abe M, Kimura T, Morimoto T,et al.Incidence of and risk factors for contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization in Japanese patients[J].Circ J,2009,73(8):15l8-1522.
[24]
Freeman RV, O’Donnell M, Share D,et al.Nephropathy requiring dialysis after percutaneous coronary intervention and the critical role of an adjusted contrast dose[J].Am J Cardiol,2002,90(10):1068-1073.
[25]
Sherwin PF, Cambron R, Johnson JA,et al.Contrast dose-to-creatinine clearance ratio as a potential indicator of risk for radiocontrast-induced nephropathy:correlation of D/CrCL with area under the contrast concentrationtime curve using iodixanol[J].Invest Radiol,2005,40(9):598-603.
[26]
Worasuwannarak S, Pornratanarangsi S.Prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy in diabetic patients undergoing elective cardiac catheterization or PCI:role of volume-to-creatinine clearance ratio and iodine dose-to-creatinine clearance ratio[J].J Med Assoc Thai,2010,93 (Suppl 1):S29-S34.
[27]
National Kidney Foundation.K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease:evaluation,classification,and stratification[J].Am J Kidney Dis,2002,39 (2 Suppl 1):S1-S266.
[28]
杨志寅.现代医学科学发展中的缺憾与思考[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2013,1(1):1-7.
[1] 曹雯佳, 刘学兵, 罗安果, 钟释敏, 邓岚, 王玉琳, 李赵欢. 超声矢量血流成像对2型糖尿病患者颈动脉壁剪切应力的研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 709-717.
[2] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[3] 徐志刚, 曹涛, 何亭, 李博奥, 魏婧韬, 张栋梁, 官浩, 杨薛康. 采用抗生素骨水泥治疗糖尿病患者心脏术后胸骨骨髓炎的临床效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 498-502.
[4] 姜珊, 李湘燕, 田硕涵, 温冰, 何睿, 齐心. 采用优化抗感染治疗模式改善糖尿病足感染预后的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 398-403.
[5] 孟令凯, 李大勇, 王宁, 王桂明, 张炳南, 李若彤, 潘立峰. 袖状胃切除术对肥胖伴2型糖尿病大鼠的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-642.
[6] 李猛, 姜腊, 董磊, 吴情, 贾犇黎. 腹腔镜胃袖状切除术治疗肥胖合并2型糖尿病及脂肪胰的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 554-557.
[7] 李想, 郭征, 田洪哲, 李杜, 熊梦瑶, 潘铁军. 1 470 nm半导体激光减容性切除治疗高危前列腺增生的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 448-452.
[8] 刘卓, 张宗明, 张翀, 刘立民, 赵月, 齐晖. 腹腔镜手术治疗高龄急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎患者的安全性与术式选择[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 795-800.
[9] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[10] 周学锋, 董哲毅, 冯哲, 蔡广研, 陈香美. 糖尿病肾脏疾病中西医结合诊疗指南计划书[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 301-305.
[11] 杜军霞, 赵小淋, 王浩然, 高志远, 王曼茜, 万楠熙, 张冬, 丁潇楠, 任琴琴, 段颖洁, 汤力, 朱晗玉. 2 型糖尿病的血液透析患者肠道微生物组学高通量测序分析[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 313-320.
[12] 邱岭, 朱旭丽, 浦坚, 邢苗苗, 吴佳玲. 糖尿病肾病患者肠道菌群生态特点与胃肠道功能障碍的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 453-458.
[13] 王璇, 娜扎开提·尼加提, 雒洋洋, 蒋升. 皮肤晚期糖基化终末产物浓度与2型糖尿病微血管并发症的相关性[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 447-454.
[14] 王星, 陈园, 热孜万古丽·乌斯曼, 郭艳英. T2DM、Obesity、NASH、PCOS共同致病因素相关的分子机制[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 481-490.
[15] 李玺, 蔡芸莹, 张永红, 苏恒. 假性软骨发育不全合并1型糖尿病一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 518-520.
阅读次数
全文
0
HTML PDF
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版 最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 0 0 0 0


摘要
21
最新录用 在线预览 正式出版
0 0 21
  来源 本网站 其他网站
  次数 6 15
  比例 29% 71%