切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (04) : 222 -225. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2016.04.002

所属专题: 文献

肿瘤诊治研究

血清甲胎蛋白异质体、高尔基体糖蛋白-73及甲胎蛋白检测在老年人原发性肝癌的诊断价值
周文瑞1, 李新丰1,(), 林奇忆1, 王高雄1, 黄天从1   
  1. 1. 362000 泉州,福建医科大学附属第二医院肝胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-24 出版日期:2016-11-26
  • 通信作者: 李新丰
  • 基金资助:
    福建省自然科学基金(2015J01444)

Assessment of serum golgi protein 73, alpha-fetoprotein variants, alpha fetoprotein detection in the diagnosis of elderly hepatocellular carcinoma

Wenrui Zhou1, Xinfeng Li1,(), Qiyi Lin1, Gaoxiong Wang1, Tiancong Huang1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China
  • Received:2016-08-24 Published:2016-11-26
  • Corresponding author: Xinfeng Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Xinfeng, Email:
引用本文:

周文瑞, 李新丰, 林奇忆, 王高雄, 黄天从. 血清甲胎蛋白异质体、高尔基体糖蛋白-73及甲胎蛋白检测在老年人原发性肝癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2016, 04(04): 222-225.

Wenrui Zhou, Xinfeng Li, Qiyi Lin, Gaoxiong Wang, Tiancong Huang. Assessment of serum golgi protein 73, alpha-fetoprotein variants, alpha fetoprotein detection in the diagnosis of elderly hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2016, 04(04): 222-225.

目的

探讨血清甲胎蛋白异质体(AFP-L3)、高尔基体糖蛋白-73(GP73)及甲胎蛋白(AFP)检测在老年人原发性肝癌(HCC)的诊断价值。

方法

研究对象为2014年1月至2016年3月就诊于福建医科大学附属第二医院普外科年龄>60岁的老年患者,共80例;其中HCC组40例,肝良性肿瘤组21例,肝硬化组19例。采用双抗体夹心酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法检测血清GP73水平,电化学发光法检测血清AFP和AFP-L3水平,微量离心柱法分离AFP-L3,并计算甲胎蛋白异质体比例(AFP-L3%)。绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),分析AFP、AFP-L3、AFP-L3%、GP73单独用于HCC鉴别诊断效果。所有入组患者均签署知情同意书,经医院伦理委员会研究通过。

结果

各组间血清AFP、AFP-L3、AFP-L3%、GP73水平差异有统计学意义(F=213.04,151.98,231.80,657.04;P<0.01)。HCC组血清AFP、AFP-L3、AFP-L3%、GP73水平[(681.41±195.56)μg/L,(138.11±44.00)μg/L,(15.31±3.28)%,(158.18±14.78)μg/L]高于肝良性肿瘤组[(7.94±3.50)μg/L,(0.41±0.28)μg/L,(3.58±0.51)%,(49.26±8.76)μg/L],差异具有统计学意义(q=22.41,22.21,25.18,47.34;P<0.01);HCC组高于肝硬化组[(64.19±33.59)μg/L,(3.94±2.91)μg/L,(4.23±0.71)%,(46.88±11.64)μg/L],差异具有统计学意义(q=25.18,23.56,27.72,47.63;P<0.01)。ROC曲线下面积分别为0.744,0.799,0.720,0.875;GP73曲线下面积最大。AFP诊断HCC敏感度及特异度为62.5%、80.0%,AFP-L3诊断HCC敏感度及特异度为70.0%、77.5%,GP73诊断HCC敏感度及特异度为90.0%、70.0%。AFP与AFP-L3联合检测后敏感度为86.7%,特异度为95.5%;AFP与GP73联合检测后敏感度为96.3%,特异度为95.5%;AFP-L3与GP73联合检测后敏感度为97.0%,特异度为93.3%。

结论

GP73、AFP-L3有望成为新的诊断原发性肝癌的血清标志物,血清AFP-L3、GP73、AFP联合检测联合应用能弥补单项血清标志物的不足,对提高老年HCC的诊断具有一定价值。

Objective

To explore the clinical application values of the detection of golgi protein-73(GP73), alpha-fetoprotein variants(AFP-L3), alpha fetoprotein(AFP) in the diagnosis of elderly hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).

Methods

Forty cases of HCC patients(HCC group), 21 cases with benign tumor of liver (benign tumor of liver group)and 19 cases with cirrhotic patients (liver cirrhosis group) were enrolled.GP73 was detected by double antibody sandwich enzyme linked immunosorbent lenscu-linaris (ELISA), AFP and AFP-L3 were examined with electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), AFP-L3 was isolated with agglutinin-coupled spin cloumn(ACSC).

Results

The differences of AFP, AFP-L3, AFP-L3%, GP73 among groups were statistically significant (F=213.04, 151.98, 231.80, 657.04; P<0.01). The expressions of AFP, AFP-L3, AFP-L3% and GP73 of HCC group [(681.41±195.56)μg/L, (138.11±44.00)μg/L, (15.31±3.28)%, (158.18±14.78)μg/L] were higher than those of benign tumor liver group [(7.94±3.50)μg/L, (0.41±0.28)μg/L, (3.58±0.51) %, (49.26±8.76) μg/L], the differences were statistically significant(q=22.41, 22.21, 25.18, 47.34; P<0.01). The expressions of AFP, AFP-L3, AFP-L3% and GP73 of liver cirrhosis group were more obvious [(64.19±33.59) μg/L, (3.94±2.91) μg/L, (4.23±0.71) %, (46.88±11.64) μg/L], compared with HCC group, the differences were statistically significant (q=25.18, 23.56, 27.72, 47.63; P<0.01). However, there were no significant differences of expression between benign tumor of liver group and liver cirrhosis group (q=1.79, 0.513, 1.46, 1.11; P>0.05). The areas of AFP, AFP-L3, AFP-L3% and GP73 under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in the differential diagnosis of primary hepatic carcinoma (PHC) were 0.744, 0.799, 0.720, 0.875, and the area of GP73 was the largest. The sensitivity and specificity of AFP were 62.5% and 80.0%, AFP-L3 were 70.0% and 77.5%, GP73 were 90.0% and 70.0%.Compared with the single detection, the sensitivity and specificity of AFP and AFP-L3 parallel testing were 86.7% and 95.5%, AFP and GP73 parallel testing were 96.3% and 95.5%, AFP-L3 and GP73 parallel testing were 97.0% and 93.3%.

Conclusions

GP73 and AFP-L3 are expected to become new serum markers for diagnosis of primary liver cancer.The allied combination of serum GP73, AFP-L3 and AFP makes up for the insufficient clinical applications of individual serum makers.

表1 各组血清AFP、AFP-L3、AFP-L3%、GP73水平比较(±s)
图1 AFP、AFP-L3、GP73单独及联合诊断HCC的价值。AFP为甲胎蛋白;AFP-L3为血清甲胎蛋白异质体;GP73为高尔基体糖蛋白-73;HCC为原发性肝癌;AFP-L3%为甲胎蛋白异质体比例
图2 AFP、AFP-L3、AFP-L3%、GP73诊断肝癌的ROC曲线。AFP为甲胎蛋白;AFP-L3为血清甲胎蛋白异质体;GP73为高尔基体糖蛋白-73;HCC为原发性肝癌;AFP-L3%为甲胎蛋白异质体比例
表2 AFP、AFP-L3、AFP-L3%及GP73鉴别诊断肝癌的ROC曲线分析
[1]
周健,张志浩,袁爱军. 老年原发性肝癌的治疗分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2001, 8(1): 82-84.
[2]
杨志寅. 现代医学科学发展中的缺憾与思考[J/CD]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2013, 1(1): 1-7.
[3]
张丽敏,吕虹,张国军, 等. 诊断学信息采集的新格局[J/CD]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2016, 4(2): 104-106..
[4]
Tamura Y,Igarashi M,Suda T, et al.Fucosylated fraction of alpha-fetoprotein as a predictor of prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2010, 55(7): 2095-2101.
[5]
Sterling RK,Wright EC,Morgan TR, et al.Frequency of elevated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) biomarkers in patients with advanced hepatitis C[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2012, 107(1): 64-74.
[6]
Kladney RD,Bulla GA,Guo L, et al.GP73, a novel golgi- localized protein upregulated by viral infection[J]. Gene, 2000, 249(1-2): 53-65.
[7]
中华人民共和国卫生部. 原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2011年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2011, 27(11): 1141-1159.
[8]
中华医学会肝病学分会, 中华医学会感染学分会. 病毒性肝炎防治指南(2010版) [J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2011, 19(1): 13-24.
[9]
Abelev GI,Perova SD,Khramkova NI, et al. Production of embryonal alpha-globulin by transplantable mouse hepatomas[J]. Transplantation, 1963(1): 174-180.
[10]
Ruoslahti E,Seppälä M. Studies of carcino-fetal proteins.3.Development of a Radioimmunoassay for-fetoprotein.Demonstration of-fetoprotein in serum of healthy human adults[J]. Int J Cancer, 1971, 8(3): 374-383.
[11]
Hu JS,Wu DW,Liang S, et al.GP73, a resident Golgi glycoprotein, is sensibility and specificity for hepatocellular carcinoma of diagnosis in a hepatitis B-endemic Asian population[J]. Med Oneol, 2010, 27(2): 339-345.
[12]
李新丰,周文瑞,王高雄, 等. 高尔基体糖蛋白73检测对原发性肝癌的诊断价值探讨[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2014, 8 (5): 365-369.
[13]
Stefaniuk P,Cianciara J,Wiercinska-Drapalo A. Present and future possibilities for early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2010, 16(4): 418-424.
[14]
Zhou Y,Yin X,Ying J, et al.Golgi protein 73 versus alpha-fetoprotein as a biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma:a diagnostic meta-analysis[J]. BMC Cancer, 2012(16): 12-17.
[15]
Tian L,Wang Y,Xu D, et al. Serological AFP/Golgi protein 73 could be a new diagnostic parameter of hepatic diseases[J]. Int J Cancer, 2011, 129(8): 1923-1931.
[16]
Durazo FA,Blatt LM,Corey WG.Desgamma carboxyprothrombin, alpha fetorpoteinand AFP-L3 inpatients with chronichepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2008, 23(10): 1541-1548.
[17]
Donati M,Brancato G,Donati A, et al. Clinical biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [J]. Front Biosci (Schol Ed ), 2010(2): 571- 577.
[18]
Li X,Wu K,Fan D. Serum Golgi phosphoprotein 2 levels better marker than alpha-fetoprotein for diagnosing early hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Hepatology, 2009, 50(1): 325.
[19]
Hann HW,Wang M,Hafner J, et al.Analysis of GP73 in patients with HCC as a function of anti-cancer treatment[J]. Cancer Biomark, 2010, 7(6): 269-273.
[1] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[2] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[3] 陈忠垚, 陈胜灯, 李秋. 不同手术时机对原发性肝癌自发破裂出血患者远期预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 518-521.
[4] 孟令展, 朱震宇. 达芬奇机器人辅助肝中叶切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 373-373.
[5] 杜锡林, 谭凯, 贺小军, 白亮亮, 赵瑶瑶. 肝细胞癌转化治疗方式[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 597-601.
[6] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[7] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[8] 何传超, 肖治宇. 晚期肝癌综合治疗模式与策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 486-489.
[9] 韩冰, 顾劲扬. 深度学习神经网络在肝癌诊疗中的研究及应用前景[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 480-485.
[10] 孟令展, 李虎, 俞鹏, 于燕宾, 曹李, 翟伟, 高远, 邵艳玲, 严锦, 朱震宇. ICG荧光染色在肝癌腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 557-561.
[11] 顾娇娇, 邹燕, 陈奕辰, 黄师菊, 张慧玲, 林楠. 基于简易营养评价精法评估肝癌患者出院后营养状况及其影响因素[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 534-539.
[12] 王楚风, 蒋安. 原发性肝癌的分子诊断[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 499-503.
[13] 廖承煜, 江斌华, 黄龙, 王丹凤, 田毅峰, 陈实. 腹腔镜下肝左叶肝内胆管细胞癌根治术优化三步法的应用价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 395-400.
[14] 赫嵘, 贾哲, 张珂, 李代京, 张萌, 蒋力. 基于PSM分析腹腔镜肝切除联合Hassab术治疗合并门静脉高压症肝癌疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 376-383.
[15] 杨发才, 游川, 雷正清, 李伟男, 段安琪, 邱应和, 李敬东, 程张军. 肿瘤负荷评分联合淋巴结分期对肝内胆管细胞癌患者术后生存预测价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 389-394.
阅读次数
全文


摘要