切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (02) : 98 -102. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2017.02.006

所属专题: 文献

心脑血管疾病专题

首发与再发急性心肌梗死患者先兆诱因及危险因素的临床研究
戚厚兴1, 崔芬2, 张金国3, 王微4,(), 谭洪勇2, 魏广和2   
  1. 1. 272067 济宁医学院中华诊断学电子杂志编辑部
    3. 272029 济宁医学院附属医院心内科
    4. 272029 济宁医学院附属医院心理科
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-06 出版日期:2017-05-26
  • 通信作者: 王微

Clinical research of foreboding inducement and risk factors of patients with first and recurrent acute myocardial infarction

Houxing Qi1, Fen Cui2, Jinguo Zhang3, Wei Wang4,(), Hongyong Tan2, Guanghe Wei2   

  1. 1. Editorial Department of Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), Jining 20267, China
    2. Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272029, China
    4. Department of Psychological, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272029, China
  • Received:2016-10-06 Published:2017-05-26
  • Corresponding author: Wei Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Wei, Email:
引用本文:

戚厚兴, 崔芬, 张金国, 王微, 谭洪勇, 魏广和. 首发与再发急性心肌梗死患者先兆诱因及危险因素的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2017, 05(02): 98-102.

Houxing Qi, Fen Cui, Jinguo Zhang, Wei Wang, Hongyong Tan, Guanghe Wei. Clinical research of foreboding inducement and risk factors of patients with first and recurrent acute myocardial infarction[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2017, 05(02): 98-102.

目的

探讨首发急性心肌梗死(AMI)与再发急性心肌梗死(RMI)的先兆诱因及临床特征。

方法

对符合国际心脏病学会及WHO关于AMI诊断标准的145例患者临床资料进行分析,依临床表现分为首发急性心肌梗死组(首发组)、再发急性心肌梗死组(再发组),分析其先兆诱因、临床特征。

结果

首发组前壁梗死的发生率显著高于再发组(62.03%,59.64%,χ2=8.65,P<0.01),而下后壁梗死发生率两组差异无统计学意义(37.97%,40.50%,χ2=0.21,P>0.05);再发组患者有家族史(32.43%)、焦虑抑郁情绪(51.35%)者显著大于首发组(16.61%,20.37%;χ2=6.56,3.81;P<0.05),而再发组吸烟者(29.73%)则显著低于首发组(51.58%,χ2=3.88,P<0.05);再发组患者心力衰竭(43.24%)、恶性心律失常(27.03%)、死亡(18.92%)的发生率显著大于首发组(20.37%,17.95%,7.40%, χ2=3.81,5.79,18.69;P<0.05)。再发组患者非原位再梗死恶性心律失常(42.88%)、死亡的发生率(21.43%)显著大于原位再梗死者(13.04%,17.39%,χ2=5.88,4.50;P<0.05)。

结论

RMI患者心肌梗死危险因素中有家族史、有焦虑抑郁情绪者显著大于首发AMI患者;RMI患者心肌梗死后心力衰竭、恶性心律失常、死亡的比例较高;RMI患者非原位再梗死后恶性心律失常、死亡的比例显著大于原位再梗死者。

Objective

To explore foreboding inducement and clinical features of patients with first and recurrent acute myocardial infarction.

Methods

One hundred and forty-five patients with acute myocardial infarction who conformed to the diagnostic criteria of International Congress of Cardiology and World Health Organization (WHO) were enrolled.Patients were divided into first acute myocardial infarction (primary group) and recurrent acute myocardial infarction (recurrence group). The foreboding inducement and clinical features were analyzed.

Results

Incidence rate of anterior infarction in primary group was higher than that in recurrence group (62.03%, 59.64%, χ2=0.21, P<0.01). Incidence rate of inferoposterior myocardial infarction in primary group (37.97%) was lower than that in recurrence group (40.50%), but the difference was not significant (χ2=8.65, P>0.05). The proportions of family history (32.43%) and anxiety-depression emotion (51.35%) in recurrence group were obviously bigger than those in primary group (16.61%, 20.37%, χ2=6.56, 3.81; P<0.05), but the ratio of smoking in recurrence group (29.73%) was lower than that in primary group (51.58%, χ2=3.88, P<0.05). The incidence rates of heart failure (43.24%), malignant arrhythmia (27.03%) and death (18.92%) in recurrence group were larger than those in primary group (20.37%, 17.95%, 7.40%), there were significant differences between the two groups (χ2=3.81, 5.79, 18.69; P<0.05). Meanwhile, the incidence rates of malignant arrhythmia (42.88%), death (21.43%) in ex-situ myocardial infarction patients were significant higher than those in in-situ myocardial infarction patients (13.04%, 17.39%, χ2=5.88, 4.50; P<0.05) in recurrence group.

Conclusions

The proportions of family history and anxiety-depression emotion in recurrence group are obviously higher than those in primary group.The incidence rates of heart failure, malignant arrhythmia and death in recurrence group are significant.The incidence rates of malignant arrhythmia and death in ex-situ myocardial infarction patients are more higher than those in in-situ myocardial infarction patients in recurrence group.

表1 两组急性心肌梗死患者梗死部位比较(例,%)
表2 两组急性心肌梗死患者危险因素比较(例,%)
表3 两组急性心肌梗死患者先兆诱因、临床特征的比较(例,%)
表4 不同部位首发与再发急性心肌梗死患者先兆诱因、临床特征的比较(例,%)
表5 不同部位再梗死患者先兆诱因、临床特征的比较(例,%)
[1]
Bouchlariotou S,Liakopoulos V,Giannopoulou M, et al.Melatonin secretion is impaired in women with preeclampsia and an abnormal circadian blood pressure rhythm[J]. Ren Fail, 2014, 36(7): 1001-1007.
[2]
邬涛,吴丹,吴清华, 等. 昼夜血压节律对急性心肌梗死合并高血压患者再发心脑血管事件的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2015, 35(5): 1178-1180.
[3]
徐成斌. 当代急性心肌梗死的治疗[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 1999: 232-233.
[4]
北京冠心病协作组. 北京地区急性心肌梗死1972~1983年住院病例的临床概况及发病趋势监测[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 1985, 13(3): 162-165.
[5]
国际心脏学会和协会及WHO临床命名标准化联合专题组1979年报告. 缺血性心脏病的命名及诊断[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 1981, 9(1): 75-76.
[6]
陶寿淇. 我国心血管病及其危险因素近年演变趋势[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 1999, 27(4): 246-247.
[7]
刘奕婷,王巍,时景璞. PCI术后急性心肌梗死患者再发影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2016, 32(4): 558-562.
[8]
陈英全,郑创建,梁羡方, 等. 非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者再发心肌梗死的影响因素及预防策略研究[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志, 2016, 24(4): 12-14.
[9]
Raposeiras Roubín S,Barreiro Pardal C,Roubín-Camiña F, et al.High-sensitivity C-reactive protein predicts adverse outcomes after non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome regardless of GRACE risk score, but not after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Rev Port Cardiol, 2013, 32(2): 117-122.
[10]
钟文军,刘圣林,李博, 等. C反应蛋白与IL-6、IL-18对急性心肌梗死合并糖尿病患者再发心血管事件的影响研究[J]. 中国实用医药, 2014, 9(17): 40-42.
[11]
戚厚兴,王微,张作记, 等. 焦虑抑郁情绪对AMI临床及心电图影响的研究[J]. 中国行为医学科学, 2001, 10(3): 204-205.
[12]
冯学泉,张作记,戚厚兴, 等. 不良心境与冠心病患者血清氧化低密度脂蛋白相关性[J]. 中国行为医学科学, 2006, 15(2): 112-114.
[13]
戚厚兴,朱志忠,贾传鲁, 等. 心理行为干预对急性心肌梗死后早期冠脉事件发生及心电图变化的影响[J]. 实用心电学杂志, 2006, 15(4): 256-258.
[14]
Growe JM,Runions J,Ebbesen LS, et al.Anxiety and depression after acute myocardial infarction[J]. Heartlung, 1996, 25(2): 98-107.
[15]
朱海燕,沈洪. 欧洲心脏病学会指南(四).院内后期治疗过程[J]. 中国危重病急救医学, 2003, 15(12): 766-767.
[16]
王静,郑刚,李琳, 等. 再发性心肌梗死危险因素的预测及预防[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2003, 11(2): 66-67.
[17]
Bbates ER.Revisiting reperfusion therapy in inferior myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997, 30(2): 334-342.
[18]
韩瑞娟,孙凯,李坤成, 等. 第二代双源CT双能量心肌灌注成像对心肌梗死的诊断价值[J/CD]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2015, 3(3): 173-178.
[19]
Kobayashi Y,Miyazaki S,Itoh A, et al.Previous angina reduces in-hospital death in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1998, 81: 117-122.
[20]
高伟,王士雯,赵玉生, 等.1827例急性心肌梗死患者梗死部位的相关分析[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2004, 13(1): 41-43.
[21]
王学忠,王岳松,邵旭武, 等. 碎裂QRS波在急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后再发主要心脏不良事件中的预后价值[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2014, 23(7): 746-751.
[22]
王学忠,邵旭武,王岳松, 等. 碎裂QRS波在急性ST段抬高心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后再发主要不良心脏事件中的预后价值[J]. 中国介入心脏病学杂志, 2014, 22(5): 313-317.
[23]
Yoon Y,Shim WH,Lee DH, et al. Usefulness of cilostazol versus tiuclopidine in coronary artery stenting[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1999, 84(12): 1375-1380.
[24]
胡波,周青,宋宏宁, 等. 斑点追踪技术预测急性心肌梗死患者再发心血管事件及死亡风险的随访研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2015, 24(6): 461-466.
[1] 明昊, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 宋宏萍. 乳腺癌风险预测模型的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 287-291.
[2] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[3] 黄鸿初, 黄美容, 温丽红. 血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗后粒细胞缺乏感染的危险因素和风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 285-292.
[4] 罗文斌, 韩玮. 胰腺癌患者首次化疗后中重度骨髓抑制的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 357-362.
[5] 李国煜, 丛赟, 祖丽胡马尔·麦麦提艾力, 何铁英. 急性胰腺炎并发门静脉系统血栓形成的危险因素及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 266-270.
[6] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[7] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[8] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[9] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[10] 张伟伟, 陈启, 翁和语, 黄亮. 随机森林模型预测T1 期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[11] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[12] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[13] 李文哲, 王毅, 崔建, 郑启航, 王靖彦, 于湘友. 新疆维吾尔自治区重症患者急性肾功能异常的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 269-276.
[14] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要