切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (02) : 115 -118. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2018.02.013

所属专题: 文献

超声诊断

乳腺黏液癌超声图像特征及误诊分析
黄润生1,(), 翁立峰1, 裴蓓1   
  1. 1. 213003 常州市第二人民医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-11 出版日期:2018-05-26
  • 通信作者: 黄润生

Ultrasonographic features and misdiagnosis analysis of mucinous carcinoma of breast

Runsheng Huang1,(), Lifeng Weng1, Bei Pei1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Changzhou Second People′s Hospital, Changzhou 213003, China
  • Received:2018-02-11 Published:2018-05-26
  • Corresponding author: Runsheng Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Runsheng, Email:
引用本文:

黄润生, 翁立峰, 裴蓓. 乳腺黏液癌超声图像特征及误诊分析[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2018, 06(02): 115-118.

Runsheng Huang, Lifeng Weng, Bei Pei. Ultrasonographic features and misdiagnosis analysis of mucinous carcinoma of breast[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(02): 115-118.

目的

探讨乳腺黏液癌的超声图像特点及超声误诊原因,以提高超声检查准确率。

方法

对2010年1月至2017年1月在常州第二人民医院乳腺外科经手术病理证实的58例乳腺黏液癌患者,共60个病灶(单纯型36例,共36个病灶;混合型22例,共24个病灶)的声像图做回顾性分析,超声表现包括肿块数量、大小、边界、形态、内部回声、后方回声及肿块内部是否伴微钙化灶、肿块内部血流情况及腋下淋巴结受累情况。

结果

58例乳腺黏液癌患者中有44例术前超声诊断与术后病理诊断符合,超声诊断准确率为75.9%(44/58);9例单纯型乳腺黏液癌术前超声参照乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分级2~3级,其中1例误诊为脂肪瘤,2例误诊为囊肿,5例误诊为纤维腺瘤或腺病,1例误诊为导管内乳头状瘤;另外5例混合型乳腺黏液癌术前超声BI-RADS分级为5级,误诊为浸润性导管癌。

结论

超声检查对乳腺黏液癌具有较高的诊断准确率。单纯型黏液癌具有良性乳腺肿块的一些声像图特征,应特别注意与乳腺良性肿块鉴别;混合型黏液癌具有浸润性导管癌的部分声像图特征,应特别注意鉴别。

Objective

To analyze the ultrasonographic features and causes of misdiagnosis of mucinous carcinoma of breast and improve the accuracy of ultrasound diagnosis.

Methods

The sonographic appearances and pathological features of mucinous carcinoma of breast in 58 patients(a total of 60 lesions, 36 lesions of 36 cases were pure type, 24 lesions of 22 cases were mixed type) diagnosed by operation and pathology were analyzed retrospectively. Ultrasonic appeareuce such as lump quantity, size, boundary, shape, internal echo, rear echo, lump internal micro calcification or not, lump internal blood stream situation and oxter lymph nodes infiltration information were analyzed.

Results

Among the 58 cases with mucinous carcinoma of breast, 44 cases′ preoperative ultrasonic diagnosis accorded with postoperative pathological diagnosis, ultrasonic diagnostic accuracy was 75.9%(44/58). Nine cases of pure type mucinous carcinoma were graded BI-RADS 2-3 by preoperative ultrasound, in which one case was misdiagnosed as lipoma, two cases were misdiagnosed as cyst, five cases were misdiagnosed as fibroadenoma or adenosis, one case was misdiagnosed as intraductal papilloma. In addition, five cases of mixed type mucinous carcinoma of breast were graded BI-RADS 5 by preoperative ultrasound and were misdiagnosed as imbibition ductal carcinoma.

Conclusions

Ultrasonography has higher diagnostic accuracy in mucinous carcinoma of breast. Pure type mucinous carcinoma of breast possess several characteristics of benign breast lumps, which should be distinguished from it. Mixed type mucinous carcinoma of breast has part sonographic characteristics of invasive ductal carcinoma, more attention should be paid to differentiate them.

图1 单纯型乳腺黏液癌患者乳腺病灶部位超声及彩色多普勒血流显像图
图2 混合型黏液癌患者乳腺病灶部位超声及彩色多普勒血流显像图
[1]
Ha KY,Deleon P,Deleon W.Invasive mucinous carcinoma of the breast[J].Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent),2013,26(3):295-297.
[2]
Bode MK,Rissanen T.Imaging findings and accuracy of core needle biopsy in mucinous carcinoma of the breast[J].Acta Radiol,2011,52(2):128-133.
[3]
Hsu GC,Yu JC.American college of radiology breast imaging reporting and data system ultrasound: an overview of the second edition[J].J Med Ultrasound,2015,23(3):117-119.
[4]
Di Savevio S,Gutierrez J,Aviser E.A restrospective review with long term follow up of 11 400 cases of mutinous breast carcinoma[J].Breast Cancer Res Treat,2008,111(3):541-547.
[5]
龚西騟,丁华野.乳腺病理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:316-321.
[6]
范林军,姜军,赵菲,等.乳腺黏液癌临床病理特点分析[J].第三军医大学学报,2003,25(23):2077-2079.
[7]
Hanagiri T,Ono K,Baba T,et al.Clinicopathologic characteristics of mucinous carcinoma of the breast[J].Int Surg,2010,95(2):126-129.
[8]
张建兴,蔡丽珊,宋光辉,等.乳腺黏液腺癌组织构成与声像图表现的对比研究[J].实用医学杂志,2013,29(16):2674-2676.
[9]
Tan JZ,Waugh J,Kumar B.et al.Mucinous carcinomas of thebreast:imaging features and potential for misdiagnosis[J].J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol,2013,57(1):25-31.
[10]
张建兴.浅谈乳腺超声报告中需注意的若干问题[J].实用医学杂志,2015,31(8):1213-1216.
[11]
严松莉,张青萍.乳腺超声与病理[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:64-72.
[12]
张涛,刘锦平.乳腺黏液癌研究现状[J].实用医院临床杂志,2008,5(6):123-125.
[13]
陈宏亮,丁昂,王懋莉,等. 乳腺黏液腺癌临床病理特征及预后[J].中华普通外科杂志,2016,31(3):180-184.
[14]
胡薇,施俊义,盛湲,等.乳腺黏液癌58例报告[J/CD].中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2007,1(5):153-154.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[5] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[6] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[7] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[8] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[9] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[10] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[11] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[12] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[13] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[14] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[15] 王华, 曹素娥, 吴建杰, 狄金明. 膀胱炎性肌纤维母细胞瘤四例诊治报告并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 547-552.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?