切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (02) : 115 -118. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2018.02.013

所属专题: 文献

超声诊断

乳腺黏液癌超声图像特征及误诊分析
黄润生1,(), 翁立峰1, 裴蓓1   
  1. 1. 213003 常州市第二人民医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-11 出版日期:2018-05-26
  • 通信作者: 黄润生

Ultrasonographic features and misdiagnosis analysis of mucinous carcinoma of breast

Runsheng Huang1,(), Lifeng Weng1, Bei Pei1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Changzhou Second People′s Hospital, Changzhou 213003, China
  • Received:2018-02-11 Published:2018-05-26
  • Corresponding author: Runsheng Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Runsheng, Email:
引用本文:

黄润生, 翁立峰, 裴蓓. 乳腺黏液癌超声图像特征及误诊分析[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2018, 06(02): 115-118.

Runsheng Huang, Lifeng Weng, Bei Pei. Ultrasonographic features and misdiagnosis analysis of mucinous carcinoma of breast[J]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(02): 115-118.

目的

探讨乳腺黏液癌的超声图像特点及超声误诊原因,以提高超声检查准确率。

方法

对2010年1月至2017年1月在常州第二人民医院乳腺外科经手术病理证实的58例乳腺黏液癌患者,共60个病灶(单纯型36例,共36个病灶;混合型22例,共24个病灶)的声像图做回顾性分析,超声表现包括肿块数量、大小、边界、形态、内部回声、后方回声及肿块内部是否伴微钙化灶、肿块内部血流情况及腋下淋巴结受累情况。

结果

58例乳腺黏液癌患者中有44例术前超声诊断与术后病理诊断符合,超声诊断准确率为75.9%(44/58);9例单纯型乳腺黏液癌术前超声参照乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分级2~3级,其中1例误诊为脂肪瘤,2例误诊为囊肿,5例误诊为纤维腺瘤或腺病,1例误诊为导管内乳头状瘤;另外5例混合型乳腺黏液癌术前超声BI-RADS分级为5级,误诊为浸润性导管癌。

结论

超声检查对乳腺黏液癌具有较高的诊断准确率。单纯型黏液癌具有良性乳腺肿块的一些声像图特征,应特别注意与乳腺良性肿块鉴别;混合型黏液癌具有浸润性导管癌的部分声像图特征,应特别注意鉴别。

Objective

To analyze the ultrasonographic features and causes of misdiagnosis of mucinous carcinoma of breast and improve the accuracy of ultrasound diagnosis.

Methods

The sonographic appearances and pathological features of mucinous carcinoma of breast in 58 patients(a total of 60 lesions, 36 lesions of 36 cases were pure type, 24 lesions of 22 cases were mixed type) diagnosed by operation and pathology were analyzed retrospectively. Ultrasonic appeareuce such as lump quantity, size, boundary, shape, internal echo, rear echo, lump internal micro calcification or not, lump internal blood stream situation and oxter lymph nodes infiltration information were analyzed.

Results

Among the 58 cases with mucinous carcinoma of breast, 44 cases′ preoperative ultrasonic diagnosis accorded with postoperative pathological diagnosis, ultrasonic diagnostic accuracy was 75.9%(44/58). Nine cases of pure type mucinous carcinoma were graded BI-RADS 2-3 by preoperative ultrasound, in which one case was misdiagnosed as lipoma, two cases were misdiagnosed as cyst, five cases were misdiagnosed as fibroadenoma or adenosis, one case was misdiagnosed as intraductal papilloma. In addition, five cases of mixed type mucinous carcinoma of breast were graded BI-RADS 5 by preoperative ultrasound and were misdiagnosed as imbibition ductal carcinoma.

Conclusions

Ultrasonography has higher diagnostic accuracy in mucinous carcinoma of breast. Pure type mucinous carcinoma of breast possess several characteristics of benign breast lumps, which should be distinguished from it. Mixed type mucinous carcinoma of breast has part sonographic characteristics of invasive ductal carcinoma, more attention should be paid to differentiate them.

图1 单纯型乳腺黏液癌患者乳腺病灶部位超声及彩色多普勒血流显像图
图2 混合型黏液癌患者乳腺病灶部位超声及彩色多普勒血流显像图
[1]
Ha KY,Deleon P,Deleon W.Invasive mucinous carcinoma of the breast[J].Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent),2013,26(3):295-297.
[2]
Bode MK,Rissanen T.Imaging findings and accuracy of core needle biopsy in mucinous carcinoma of the breast[J].Acta Radiol,2011,52(2):128-133.
[3]
Hsu GC,Yu JC.American college of radiology breast imaging reporting and data system ultrasound: an overview of the second edition[J].J Med Ultrasound,2015,23(3):117-119.
[4]
Di Savevio S,Gutierrez J,Aviser E.A restrospective review with long term follow up of 11 400 cases of mutinous breast carcinoma[J].Breast Cancer Res Treat,2008,111(3):541-547.
[5]
龚西騟,丁华野.乳腺病理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:316-321.
[6]
范林军,姜军,赵菲,等.乳腺黏液癌临床病理特点分析[J].第三军医大学学报,2003,25(23):2077-2079.
[7]
Hanagiri T,Ono K,Baba T,et al.Clinicopathologic characteristics of mucinous carcinoma of the breast[J].Int Surg,2010,95(2):126-129.
[8]
张建兴,蔡丽珊,宋光辉,等.乳腺黏液腺癌组织构成与声像图表现的对比研究[J].实用医学杂志,2013,29(16):2674-2676.
[9]
Tan JZ,Waugh J,Kumar B.et al.Mucinous carcinomas of thebreast:imaging features and potential for misdiagnosis[J].J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol,2013,57(1):25-31.
[10]
张建兴.浅谈乳腺超声报告中需注意的若干问题[J].实用医学杂志,2015,31(8):1213-1216.
[11]
严松莉,张青萍.乳腺超声与病理[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:64-72.
[12]
张涛,刘锦平.乳腺黏液癌研究现状[J].实用医院临床杂志,2008,5(6):123-125.
[13]
陈宏亮,丁昂,王懋莉,等. 乳腺黏液腺癌临床病理特征及预后[J].中华普通外科杂志,2016,31(3):180-184.
[14]
胡薇,施俊义,盛湲,等.乳腺黏液癌58例报告[J/CD].中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2007,1(5):153-154.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[3] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[4] 唐玮, 何融泉, 黄素宁. 深度学习在乳腺癌影像诊疗和预后预测中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 323-328.
[5] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[6] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[7] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[8] 伍秋苑, 陈佩贤, 邓裕华, 何添成, 周丹. 肠道微生物在乳腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 362-365.
[9] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[10] 周婉丽, 钱铮, 李喆. 槐耳在乳腺癌免疫治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 369-371.
[11] 熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[12] 杨小菁, 姜瑞瑞, 石玉香, 王静静, 李长天. 乳腺孤立性纤维性肿瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 375-377.
[13] 冯雪园, 韩萌萌, 马宁. 乳腺原发上皮样血管内皮瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 378-380.
[14] 王亮, 符谨诚, 许薇, 李彦庆, 郭永波, 邹科见. 直肠成熟囊性畸胎瘤伴直肠阴道瘘一例并文献复习[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 117-118.
[15] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
阅读次数
全文


摘要