切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 239 -243. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2019.04.005

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

诱发性椎间盘造影联合完全可视经皮内窥镜技术诊治盘源性腰痛的价值
席志鹏1, 李敬池1, 康然1, 张仕兵1, 谢林1,()   
  1. 1. 210028 南京,江苏省中西医结合医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-27 出版日期:2019-11-26
  • 通信作者: 谢林
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省中医药领军人才项目(SLJ0210); 江苏省卫生计生委科研项目(BJ16026)

Clinical value of provocative discography combined with fully visible percutaneous endoscopic surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of discogenic low back pain

Zhipeng Xi1, Jingchi Li1, Ran Kang1, Shibing Zhang1, Lin Xie1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Jiangsu Province Hospital on Integration of Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing 210028, China
  • Received:2019-06-27 Published:2019-11-26
  • Corresponding author: Lin Xie
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xie Lin, Email:
引用本文:

席志鹏, 李敬池, 康然, 张仕兵, 谢林. 诱发性椎间盘造影联合完全可视经皮内窥镜技术诊治盘源性腰痛的价值[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2019, 07(04): 239-243.

Zhipeng Xi, Jingchi Li, Ran Kang, Shibing Zhang, Lin Xie. Clinical value of provocative discography combined with fully visible percutaneous endoscopic surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of discogenic low back pain[J]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(04): 239-243.

目的

探讨椎间盘源性腰痛的诊断方法并分析诱发性椎间盘造影联合完全可视内窥镜技术诊治盘源性腰痛的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2015年7月至2018年6月江苏省中西医结合医院骨科收治的29例通过诱发性椎间盘造影检查诊断为椎间盘源性腰痛患者的临床资料,该组患者全部应用完全可视内窥镜技术行髓核摘除、双极射频纤维环成形治疗。术前和术后1 d、3个月、6个月随访时对患者腰痛进行视觉模拟评分(VAS),对腰椎功能采用Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评估,采用改良MacNab标准评价疗效。

结果

29例患者均成功实施手术,术后1 d、3个月、6个月VAS评分[(1.53±0.43)分,(1.06±0.61)分,(0.71±0.37)分]与术前VAS评分[(6.62±1.01)分]比较,均逐渐下降,差异有统计学意义(F=132.13,P<0.05);术后1 d、3个月、6个月ODI评分[(14.12±1.43)分,(12.98±2.01)分,(10.33±1.46)分]与术前ODI评分[(51.11±10.15)分]比较,均逐渐下降,差异有统计学意义(F=293.35,P<0.05);术后6个月时根据改良MacNab评分标准:优22例,良5例,可2例,差0例,术后优良率为93.10%(27/29)。

结论

诱发性椎间盘造影联合完全可视内窥镜技术诊治盘源性腰痛疗效好、安全性高,手术风险小,并发症少。

Objective

To explore the diagnostic methods and analyse the clinical effect of provocative discography combined with fully visible percutaneous endoscopic surgery of discogenic low back pain (DLBP).

Methods

The clinical data of 29 patients diagnosed with DLBP by provocative discography admitted to the department of orthopedics of Jiangsu Province Hospital on Integration of Chinese and Western Medicine from July 2015 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients underwent a fully visible percutaneous endoscopic procedure(disectomy and bipolar annuloplasty). The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (preoperative, postoperative 1 day, 3 months, 6 months) were evaluated. The clinical global outcomes were assessed on the basis of modified MacNab criteria.

Results

All patients were successfully performed the operation. VAS significantly declined from preoperative (6.62±1.01) to postoperative 1 day (1.53±0.43), 3 months (1.06±0.61) and 6 months (0.71±0.37) (F=132.13, P<0.05). ODI decreased from preoperative (51.11±10.15) to 1 day (14.12±1.43), 3 months(12.98±2.01) and 6 months (10.33±1.46) (F=293.35, P<0.05). At the last follow-up, 22 cases of the MacNab results were excellent, 5 cases were good, 2 cases were fair, and none was bad, and the excellent-to-good rate was 93.10%(27/29).

Conclusion

With fewer complications and a lower risk, provocative discography combined with fully visible percutaneous endoscopic surgery is safe and efficacious in the treatment of DLBP.

图1 盘源性腰痛患者经诱发性椎间盘造影联合完全可视内窥镜技术诊治的影像学及术中镜下图像
表1 诱发性椎间盘造影联合完全可视内窥镜技术诊治盘源性腰痛患者手术前后VAS评分、ODI评分比较(分,±s)
[1]
Peng BG.Pathophysiology,diagnosis,and treatment of discogenic low back pain[J].World J Orthop,2013,4(2):42-52.
[2]
Moneta GB, Videman T, Kaivanto K,et al.Reported pain during lumbar discography as a function of anular ruptures and disc degeneration.A re-analysis of 833 discograms[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),1994,19(17):1968-1974.
[3]
Kloth DS, Fenton DS, Andersson GB,et al.Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) for the treatment of discogenic low back pain:patient selection and indications for use[J].Pain Physician,2008,11(5):659-668.
[4]
Peng B, Hao J, Hou S, et al. Possible pathogenesis of painful intervertebral disc degeneration[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2006,31(5):560-566.
[5]
Freemont AJ, Peacock TE, Goupille P,et al.Nerve ingrowth into diseased intervertebral disc in chronic back pain[J].Lancet,1997,350(9072):178-181.
[6]
Centerville OH, Niagara WI, Spine A, et al. An update of the systematic appraisal of the accuracy and utility of discography in chronic spinal pain[J].Pain Physician,2018,21(2):91-110.
[7]
Andersson GB, Mekhail NA, Block JE.Treatment of intractable discogenic low back pain:a systematic review of spinal fusion and intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET)[J].Pain Physician,2006,9(3):237-248.
[8]
Archavlis E, Carvi y Nievas M.Comparison of minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation versus open surgery for severe stenotic spondylolisthesis with high-grade facet joint osteoarthritis[J].Eur Spine J,2013,22(8):1731-1740.
[9]
Bono CM, Harris MB, Warholic N, et al. Pain intensity and patients acceptance of surgical complication risks with lumbar fusion[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2013,38(2):140-147.
[10]
Kjeldsen HB, Klausen TW, Rosenberg J.Preferred presentation of the visual analog scale for measurement of postoperative pain[J].Pain Practice,2016,16(8):980-984.
[11]
Fairbank JC.Oswestry disability index[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2014,20(2):239-241.
[12]
Macnab I.Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1971,53(5):891-903.
[13]
潘祥林,王涓冬,赵华.临床诊断思维[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2015,3(2):84-85.
[14]
Aprill C, Bogduk N.High-intensity zone:a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging[J].Br J Radiol,1992,65(773):361-369.
[15]
Carragee EJ, Paragioudakis SJ, Khurana S. 2000 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies:lumbar high-intensity zone and discography in subjects without low back problems[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2000,25(23):2987-2992.
[16]
Kluner C, Kivelitz D, Rogalla P,et al.Percutaneous discography:comparison of low-dose CT,fluoroscopy and MRI in the diagnosis of lumbar disc disruption[J].Eur Spine J,2006,15(5):620-626.
[17]
Margetic P, Pavic R, Stancic MF.Provocative discography screening improves surgical outcome[J].Wien Klin Wochenschr,2013,125(19/20):600-610.
[18]
Gill K, Blumenthal SL. Functional results after anterior lumbar fusion at L5-S1 in patients with normal and abnormal MRI scans[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),1992,17(8):940-942.
[19]
Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, et al. Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain:a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2001,26(23):2521-2532.
[20]
Ohtori S, Koshi T, Yamashita M,et al.Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of selected patients with discogenic low back pain:a small-sized randomized trial[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2011,36(5):347-354.
[21]
Bogduk N, Aprill C, Derby R.Lumbar discogenic pain:state-of-the-art review[J].Pain Med,2013,14(6):813-836.
[22]
Ilhan S, Ozturk I.The effect of intradiscal electrothermal therapy on quality of life and satisfaction of patients with discogenic low back pain[J].Eurasian J Med,2017,1(2):101-105.
[23]
Desai MJ, Kapural L, Petersohn JD,et al.Twelve-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing intradiscal biacuplasty to conventional medical management for discogenic lumbar back pain[J].Pain Med,2017,18(4):751-763.
[24]
Liliang PC, Lu K, Liang CL,et al.Nucleoplasty for treating lumbar disk degenerative low back pain:an outcome prediction analysis[J].J Pain Res,2016(9):893-898.
[25]
Cheng J, Zheng W, Wang H, et al. Posterolateral transforaminal selective endoscopic diskectomy with thermal annuloplasty for discogenic low back pain:a prospective observational study[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2014(39):60-65.
[26]
Pan F, Shen B, Chy SK,et al.Transforaminal endoscopic system technique for discogenic low back pain:a prospective cohort study[J].Int J Surg,2016(35):134-138.
[27]
Pan Z, Ha Y, Yi S,et al.Efficacy of transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS) technique in treating lumbar disc herniation[J].Med Sci Monit,2016(22):530-539.
[28]
Liu KC, Yang SK, Ou BR.Using percutaneous endoscopic outside-in technique to treat selected patients with refractory discogenic low back pain[J].Pain Physician,2019,22(2):187-198.
[1] 李芸, 明佳. 腋窝单孔腔镜辅助下乳房切除术加一期乳房重建研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 315-318.
[2] 蔡茗, 俞亚红. 胆总管结石术后复发危险因素的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 438-442.
[3] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[4] 宋奇锋, 高良辉, 林师佈, 李永强, 曾维乾. 三种不同预切法在ERCP困难插管中的临床效果分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 526-529.
[5] 朱俊杰, 王斌, 刘覃, 蔡志杰. LC联合LCBDE对急性结石性胆囊炎合并胆总管结石的临床疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 458-461.
[6] 郑尧帆, 林方德, 史方义, 林师佈. 改良腹腔镜-内镜双镜联合手术与腹腔镜辅助内镜下切除术治疗早期胃癌的临床效果分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 267-270.
[7] 王乾宇, 杜峻峰, 陈纲. 经内镜OTSC系统治疗胃手术后吻合口漏(瘘)的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 700-702.
[8] 范清泉, 宋晓玲, 翁明哲, 顾钧. 消化道重建术后ERCP安全性和疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 331-335.
[9] 郭世龙, 杨潇, 胡欢欢, 杨梁, 周文富, 丛魁武, 张雨胜, 李英锋. ERCP在胆胰疾病微创治疗中的有效性及安全性[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 216-220.
[10] 郝杰, 李宇, 陈晨, 杨雪, 陶杰, 王铮, 董鼎辉, 仵正, 孙昊. 十二指肠侧视镜引导下ERCP在消化道重建术后胆胰疾病治疗中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 221-226.
[11] 肖慜, 顾杨军, 林鑫, 庄莉, 李启勇. T管支撑与内镜综合治疗肝移植术后胆管坏死合并胆管结石一例[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(02): 206-208.
[12] 郭志唐, 白锦峰, 孙敏, 滕毅山, 李世思, 陈章彬. PTCD与ERCP+ENBD在恶性梗阻性黄疸姑息性治疗中疗效比较[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(06): 564-569.
[13] 牛帅, 朱旗海. 超早期经神经内窥镜治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的临床效果[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(03): 142-145.
[14] 郑慧媛, 马新春, 张英, 张玉梅. 克拉霉素联合鼻窦内窥镜手术对慢性鼻窦炎鼻息肉患者炎症反应和免疫功能的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 63-67.
[15] 陈德鑫, 翟亚奇, 李明阳. 胃窦血管扩张症的治疗进展[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2022, 09(03): 138-144.
阅读次数
全文


摘要