切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (04) : 265 -267. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2016.04.013

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

临床研究

15 500例新生儿脐带血染色体核型分析
唐敬龙1,(), 王丽媛2, 冯雪花2, 饶伟强1, 周红1, 杨晓丹1, 张燕1, 杜晓雪1, 张贵玲1, 程东方1, 鲍艳丽1, 吴莉莉1   
  1. 1. 250002 济南艾迪康医学检验中心生殖遗传实验室
    2. 250001 济南,山东中医药大学第二附属医院肿瘤科
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-05 出版日期:2016-11-26
  • 通信作者: 唐敬龙
  • 基金资助:
    河北省科技计划项目(13272504D)

Karyotype analysis of umbilical blood in 15 500 newborns

Jinglong Tang1,(), Liyuan Wang2, Xuehua Feng2, Weiqiang Rao1, Hong Zhou1, Xiaodan Yang1, Yan Zhang1, Xiaoxue Du1, Guiling Zhang1, Dongfang Cheng1, Yanli Bao1, Lili Wu1   

  1. 1. Department of Reproductive Genetics Laboratory, Adicon Clinical Laboratories, Jinan 250002, China
    2. Department of Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Traditional Chinese Medicine University, Jinan 250001, China
  • Received:2016-05-05 Published:2016-11-26
  • Corresponding author: Jinglong Tang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tang Jinglong, Email:
引用本文:

唐敬龙, 王丽媛, 冯雪花, 饶伟强, 周红, 杨晓丹, 张燕, 杜晓雪, 张贵玲, 程东方, 鲍艳丽, 吴莉莉. 15 500例新生儿脐带血染色体核型分析[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2016, 04(04): 265-267.

Jinglong Tang, Liyuan Wang, Xuehua Feng, Weiqiang Rao, Hong Zhou, Xiaodan Yang, Yan Zhang, Xiaoxue Du, Guiling Zhang, Dongfang Cheng, Yanli Bao, Lili Wu. Karyotype analysis of umbilical blood in 15 500 newborns[J]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2016, 04(04): 265-267.

目的

研究新生儿脐带血中染色体异常的发生率,并对脐带血染色体数目与结构异常及染色体多态性进行综合分析。

方法

对新生儿脐带血进行收集,进行淋巴细胞培养,常规G显带,行染色体核型分析。

结果

在培养成功的15 500例脐带血标本中,检出异常核型314例,在人群中的发生率为2.03%;其中染色体倒位患儿220例,发生率1.42%,构成比70.10%;染体易位患儿41例,发生率0.26%,构成比13.00%;染色体衍生患儿14例,发生率0.09%,构成比4.51%;21-三体患儿12例,发生率0.08%,构成比3.80%;D-G组易位患儿11例,发生率0.08%,构成比3.50%;性染色体异常中47,XXX患儿5例,47,XXY患儿7例,45,X患儿4例,发生率0.10%,构成比5.10%。染色体多态性检出317例,其发生率为2.04%。其他各组与倒位组发生率及构成比比较,均差异有统计学意义(χ2=11.53,15.98;P<0.05);而易位、衍生、21-三体、D-G组易位及性染色体异常等发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),各组异常自然发生率比较接近。

结论

新生儿脐带血染色体核型分析,对目前产前诊断不足具有很好的补充意义,对二级预防、再生育及临床指导有重要意义。

Objective

To study the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in the umbilical cord blood, and analyze the number and structure and chromosome poly-morphism of the cord blood.

Methods

Umbilical cord blood was collected for lymphocyte culture, conventional G-banding and karyotype analysis.

Results

15 500 cases of umbilical cord blood samples were detected, of which 314 cases were abnormal karyotypes, the rate was 2.03%.Chromosomal inversions of children were 220, the percentage in population was 1.42%, the constituent ratio was 70.10%.Chromosomal translocations samples were 41, the percentage in population was 0.26%, the constituent ratio was 13.00%.Chromosome-derived samples were 14, the percentage in population was 0.09%, the constituent ratio was 4.51%.Children with 21-Down Syndrome samples were 12, the percentage in population was 0.08%, the constituent ratio was 3.80%.Children with displaced robertson were 11, the percentage in population was 0.08%, the constituent ratio was 3.50%.In sex chromosome abnormalities, 47, XXX were 5, 47, XXY were 7, 45, X were 4, the percentage in population was 0.10%, the constituent ratio was 5.10%.Children with chromosomal polymorphism were 317, the percentage in population was 2.04%.Compared with the other groups, the chromosomal inversions group′ proportion and constituent ratio were significantly different (χ2=11.53, 15.98; P<0.05). The differences among translocateon, chromosome-derived, 21-Down Syndrome, D-G group and sex chromosome abnormal incidence were not significant (P>0.05), the incidence of abnormal natural of each group was closer.

Conclusions

Karyotype analysis of neonatal umbilical cord blood is a very useful to the insufficient prenatal diagnosis, and important for secondary prevention, fertility and clinical guidlines.

表1 新生儿脐带血染色体异常核型各组发生率及构成比比较(n=314)
[1]
潘莉珍,杨芳华,梁昕, 等.2 150例产前筛查高风险胎儿的脐血染色体产前诊断[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2010, 18(9): 41-42.
[2]
赖怡,刘之英,秦利, 等.25 510份孕中期羊水细胞的染色体分析[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志, 2015, 32(1): 117-119.
[3]
王华,席惠,贾政军, 等. 应用单核苷酸多态芯片技术产前诊断四例胎儿新发染色体变异[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志, 2013, 29(6): 658-661.
[4]
Rooney EBD.Constitutional analysis:human cytogenetics[M].3th ed.New York: Oxford University Press,2001: 12-15.
[5]
邵敏杰,高雪峰,焦丽萍, 等. 染色体异态性与生殖异常关系的探讨[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2011, 19(2): 45-47.
[6]
梁梅英,陈军丽,宋桂宁. 大Y染色体核型与生育异常的关系分析[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2005, 6(2): 86-88.
[7]
石东红,谢鲁文. 大Y与生育关系的探讨(附95例分析)[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 1999, 7(1): 51.
[8]
陈志央,陈意振,鲁莉萍, 等. 孕中期产前筛查30 159例结果分析[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2005, 13(5): 70.
[9]
杨丽霞,张琪瑶,孙伟, 等.31例染色体多态性与生殖异常的关系[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2008, 16(4): 38-39.
[10]
陈东红,武蓉珍,刘胜勇, 等.249例生殖异常患者的染色体核型分析[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2008, 17(3): 433-434.
[11]
杨志寅. 现代医学科学发展中的缺憾与思考[J/CD]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2013, 1(1): 1-7.
[1] 谢燕华, 陈伟玲, 唐子鉴, 陶宏伟, 何学智, 黄兵旋, 许娜, 夏焙. 新生儿及小婴儿化脓性髋关节炎的超声诊断:病例系列研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(12): 1377-1382.
[2] 包艳娟, 杨小红, 杨星海, 潘圣宝, 杨帆, 赵胜. 腹膜后内寄生胎产前和新生儿期的临床与超声影像学特征[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(12): 1349-1354.
[3] 满婷婷, 郝晓艳, 刘晓伟, 孙海瑞, 何怡华. 法洛四联症常见心内合并畸形及遗传学异常分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(08): 779-784.
[4] 董晓燕, 赵琪, 唐军, 张莉, 杨晓燕, 李姣. 奥密克戎变异株感染所致新型冠状病毒感染疾病新生儿的临床特征分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 595-603.
[5] 杨莹, 刘艳, 王央丹. 新生儿结节性硬化症相关性癫痫1例并文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 464-472.
[6] 魏徐, 张鸽, 伍金林. 新生儿脓毒症相关性凝血病的监测和治疗[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 379-386.
[7] 赵金琦, 杨楠, 宫丽霏, 唐玥, 李璐璐, 杨海河, 孔元原. 2011—2020年北京市小于胎龄儿出生状况分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 278-286.
[8] 曾照敏, 余海燕. 超雌综合征的临床认知[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 145-150.
[9] 陈玉莲, 刘瀚旻. 人体生命早期呼吸系统菌群与肺部微生物组发育特征及早期菌群稳态研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 31-37.
[10] 张雯, 徐宏燕, 张彦春, 刘凯波. 2017—2021年北京市先天性心脏病流行病学资料分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 61-68.
[11] 卞玉香, 王丽春, 蔡蓉. 胎儿超声软指标对胎儿染色体异常的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 85-92.
[12] 李东明, 何升. 先天性巨细胞病毒感染早期筛查研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 627-633.
[13] 郝萧, 刘兴莉, 夏小叶, 刁雪芹, 姚美雪. 母亲免疫球蛋白G不规则抗体效价及其效价积分对母婴Rh血型不合新生儿溶血病患儿换血治疗的预测分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 677-684.
[14] 赵超, 郑超, 周健. 永存胚胎血管的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 352-356.
[15] 强光峰, 孟兰兰, 赵静, 牛峰海, 任雪云. 肺部超声评分对呼吸困难新生儿使用有创机械通气的预测价值[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 104-108.
阅读次数
全文


摘要