切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (04) : 243 -247. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2017.04.007

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

甲胎蛋白异质体在老年肝癌诊断与肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗中的临床意义
黄天从1, 李新丰1,(), 刘德鑫1, 王高雄1, 苏永利1   
  1. 1. 362000 泉州,福建医科大学附属第二医院肝胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-23 出版日期:2017-11-26
  • 通信作者: 李新丰
  • 基金资助:
    福建省自然科学基金(2015JO1444)

Clinical significance of AFP-L3 in the diagnosis and treatment of transcather arterial chemoembolization in elderly patients with primary hepatic carcinoma

Tiancong Huang1, Xinfeng Li1,(), Dexin Liu1, Gaoxiong Wang1, Yongli Su1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobilliary Surgery, The second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China
  • Received:2017-07-23 Published:2017-11-26
  • Corresponding author: Xinfeng Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Xinfeng, Email:
引用本文:

黄天从, 李新丰, 刘德鑫, 王高雄, 苏永利. 甲胎蛋白异质体在老年肝癌诊断与肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗中的临床意义[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2017, 05(04): 243-247.

Tiancong Huang, Xinfeng Li, Dexin Liu, Gaoxiong Wang, Yongli Su. Clinical significance of AFP-L3 in the diagnosis and treatment of transcather arterial chemoembolization in elderly patients with primary hepatic carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2017, 05(04): 243-247.

目的

研究甲胎蛋白异质体3(AFP-L3)、甲胎蛋白(AFP)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)在老年人原发性肝癌(PHC)的诊断及肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗的临床意义。

方法

选择2014年6月至2016年12月就诊于福建医科大学附属第二医院普通外科的60岁以上老年患者,共72例,其中PHC组42例,肝良性肿瘤组患者30例。采用双抗体夹心酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测血清VEGF水平,电化学发光法检测AFP和AFP-L3水平,微量离心柱法分离AFP-L3,并计算AFP-L3%。

结果

42例PHC患者中肝硬化组AFP、VEGF表达高于无肝硬化组(t=6.38,12.10;均P<0.05);肿瘤直径>5 cm组AFP、AFP-L3、VEGF表达高于肿瘤直径≤5 cm组(t=17.30,10.72,6.21;均P<0.05);肿瘤多发组AFP、AFP-L3、VEGF表达高于肿瘤单发组(t=9.07,13.83,9.44;均P<0.05)。PHC组AFP、AFP-L3、VEGF水平高于肝良性肿瘤组(t=19.06,17.90,20.20;均P<0.01)。AFP在TACE后1个月的表达水平明显低于术前(q=9.04,P<0.01)。VEGF术后1周的表达水平低于术前(q=11.62,P<0.01)。AFP-L3术后1周和术后一个月的表达水平均低于术前(q=13.30,9.03;均P<0.01)。将PHC患者按照AFP浓度分为2组,比较2组间AFP-L3%阳性率,差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.88,P>0.05)。AFP-L3、AFP和VEGF ROC曲线下面积分别为0.83,0.79,0.68,AFP-L3线下面积最大;AFP-L3、AFP、VEGF三项单独检测的敏感度分别为82.1%、67.3%、59.7%,特异度分别为76.7%、72.5%、80.1%。AFP-L3的敏感度和特异度均显著高于AFP(χ2=5.92,P<0.05);将AFP及AFP-L3联合检测后发现,敏感度为94.1%,特异度为55.6%。三者联合诊断的敏感度为97.6%,特异度为47.6%。

结论

血清AFP-L3诊断PHC的价值优于AFP,多种血清标志物联合检测可相互弥补单一检测的不足,从而提高PHC诊断的阳性率;尤其是对于PHC的早期诊断,具有更好的临床应用价值。

Objective

To investigate the clinical significance of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) variant (AFP-L3), AFP and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the diagnosis of elderly primary hepatic carcinoma (PHC) and the treatment of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Methods

Sevnty-two cases of elderly hepatic lesions in the second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University were enrolled.Forty-two cases of PHC elder patients (PHC group), 30 cases of benign tumor of liver (benign tumor liver group) were selected.VEGF was detected by double antibody sandwich ELISA, AFP and AFP-L3 were detected with electrochemical luminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), AFP-L3 was isolated with lens culinaris agglutinin (LCA)-coupled spin column(ACSC).

Results

The serum levels of AFP and VEGF in hepatic cirrhosis group were significantly higher than those in no cirrhosis group (t=6.38, 12.10, P<0.05). The serum levels of AFP, AFP-L3 and VEGF in tumor diameter >5 cm group were higher than those in tumor diameter ≤5 cm group (t=17.30, 10.72, 6.21, P<0.05). The serum levels of AFP, AFP-L3 and VEGF in multiple tumor group were higher than those in tumor single tumor group (t=9.07, 13.83, 9.44, P<0.05). The serum levels of AFP, AFP-L3 and VEGF in PHC group were significantly higher than those in benign tumor of liver group (t=19.06, 17.90, 20.20, P<0.01). The serum level of postoperative AFP was significantly lower than that of preoperative level (q=9.04, P<0.01). The serum level of postoperative VEGF was significantly lower than that of preoperative level(q=11.62, P<0.01). One week and one month after operation, the serum levels of AFP-L3 were lower than that before the surgery level (q=13.30, 9.03, P<0.01). The areas of AFP, AFP-L3, VEGF under the ROC curve in the differential diagnosis of PHC were 0.83, 0.79, 0.68, and the area of AFP-L3 was the largest.The sensitivity and specificity of AFP-L3 were 82.1% and 76.7%, the sensitivity and specificity of AFP were 67.3% and 72.5%, the sensitivity and specificity of VEGF were 59.7% and 80.1%.Compared with the single detection, the sensitivity and specificity of AFP+ AFP-L3 were 94.1% and 55.6%, the sensitivity and specificity of AFP+ AFP-L3+ VEGF were 97.6% and 47.6%.

Conclusions

The diagnostic value of AFP-L3 is better than that of AFP.The allied combination of serum AFP, AFP-L3 and AFP makes up for the insufficient clinical applications of individual serum makers.

表1 42例PHC患者血清AFP-L3、AFP、VEGF水平的比较(μg/L,±s)
表2 PHC组与肝脏良性肿瘤组患者血清AFP-L3、AFP、VEGF水平比较(μg/L,±s)
表3 PHC组患者TACE治疗前、后血清AFP-L3、VEGF、AFP水平比较(μg/L,±s)
表4 PHC组患者不同血清AFP水平AFP-L3%阳性率比较
图1 AFP-L3、AFP、VEGF诊断老年人原发性肝癌的ROC曲线
表5 AFP-L3、AFP、VEGF诊断肝癌的ROC曲线分析
[1]
Tamura Y,Igarashi M,Kawai H, et al.Clinical advantage of highly sensitive on-chip immunoassay for fucosylated fraction of alpha-fetoprotein in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2010, 55(12): 3576-3583.
[2]
熊锦华,范公忍,陈力强, 等. 肝动脉化疗栓塞联合经皮射频治疗中晚期老年肝癌的临床观察[J], 中国现代普通外科进展, 2013, 16(5): 355-358.
[3]
Li X,Lu G,Liu D, et al.Combination therapy of multiple micro trauma technology on hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Cancer Ther, 2013, 4(3): 695-697.
[4]
中华人民共和国卫生部. 原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2011年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2011, 27(11): 1141-1159.
[5]
Parkin DM,Bray F,Ferlay J, et al.Global cancer statistics, 2002[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2005, 55(2): 74-108.
[6]
周文瑞,李新丰,林奇忆, 等. 血清甲胎蛋白异质体、高尔基体糖蛋白-73及甲胎蛋白检测在老年人原发性肝癌的诊断价值[J/CD]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2016, 4(4): 222-225.
[7]
Ruoslahti E,Seppälä M.Studies of carcino-fetal proteins.Ⅲ.Develo Pment of a Radioimmunoassay for-fetoprotein.Demonstration of α-fetoprotein in serum of healthy human adults[J]. Int J Cancer, 1971, 8(3): 374-383.
[8]
Byrne AM,Bouchier-Hayes DJ,Harmey JH.Angiogenic and cell survival functions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [J]. J Cell Mol Med, 2005, 9(4): 777-794.
[9]
Ernens I,Léonard F,Vausort M, et al.Adenosine up-regulates vascular endothelial growth factor in human macrophages [J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2010, 392(3): 351-356.
[10]
徐安涛.TACE对肝癌患者血清VEGF和CTGF表达水平的影响及意义[D].济南:山东大学,2012.
[11]
Donati M,Brancato G,Donati A, et al.Clinical biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma (PHC) [J]. Front Biosci (Schol Ed ), 2010, 1(2): 571-577.
[12]
Song BC,Suh DJ,Yang SH, et ai.Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive alpha-fetoprotein as a prognostic marker in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transcatheter arterial chemoembolization[J]. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2002, 35(5): 398-402.
[1] 徐耀博, 吴斌全. 三维可视化技术结合术中超声在可切除肝癌腹腔镜手术的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 273-277.
[2] 张宇珂, 杜顺达, 毛一雷. 尿液检测在原发性肝癌中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 225-230.
[3] 周保富, 吴乐乐, 李永红, 胡世超. 肝切除术中不同断肝方式治疗多病灶原发性肝癌的临床效果研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 205-209.
[4] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[5] 董奕琦, 罗耀兵, 刘涛, 张岚, 杨明. 血流拓扑学肝分段与Couinaud肝分段在原发性肝癌术前评估及手术规划中的应用价值[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 423-426.
[6] 陈亚峰, 李江斌, 钟文钧, 董瑞, 臧莉, 阴继凯, 杜锡林, 鲁建国. 腹腔镜微波消融治疗≤3 cm肝细胞肝癌的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(05): 271-276.
[7] 韩冰, 顾劲扬. 深度学习神经网络在肝癌诊疗中的研究及应用前景[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 480-485.
[8] 赫嵘, 贾哲, 张珂, 李代京, 张萌, 蒋力. 基于PSM分析腹腔镜肝切除联合Hassab术治疗合并门静脉高压症肝癌疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 376-383.
[9] 葛云鹏, 崔红元, 宋京海. 人工智能在原发性肝癌诊断、治疗及预后中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 367-371.
[10] 黄学卿, 魏楠, 蒋天鹏, 安天志, 王黎洲, 许敏, 周石. 超声引导经远端桡动脉入路行肝癌TACE术的临床研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 251-256.
[11] 吴蓝, 冯建宇. 肝癌TACE术中应用利多卡因的效果观察[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 333-338.
[12] 李辉, 李海霞, 王秀香. 血必净注射液辅助治疗原发性肝癌介入术后综合征的临床研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 27-31.
[13] 张晓, 查婧, 管竹春, 周凯. 海藻酸钠微球与碘化油经导管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝癌疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 57-64.
[14] 杨海宁, 樊庆胜, 刘福全, 王华明, 陈芋屹, 杨国旺. 中医调肝理脾法防治肝癌栓塞术后综合征的临床观察[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 20-24.
[15] 石钦, 周晨, 刘家成, 黄松江, 杨崇图, 熊斌. 载药栓塞材料在肝癌治疗中的应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2020, 08(04): 364-369.
阅读次数
全文


摘要