切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (01) : 54 -58. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2019.01.011

所属专题: 文献

基础研究

沙棘干乳剂对小鼠食管上皮内瘤变的阻断作用初探
陈星宇1, 孔令斌2,(), 张帆2, 方萧1, 张永超1, 杨景玉3   
  1. 1. 272067 济宁医学院
    2. 济宁医学院临床学院
    3. 272033 济宁,山东省医学科学院山东省消化病防治中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-28 出版日期:2019-02-26
  • 通信作者: 孔令斌
  • 基金资助:
    济宁市科技局资助项目(2015130)

Blocking effect of seabuckthorn emulsion on esophageal intraepithelial neoplasia in mice

Xingyu Chen1, Lingbin Kong2,(), Fan Zhang2, Xiao Fang1, Yongchao Zhang1, Jingyu Yang3   

  1. 1. Graduate School, Jining 272067, China
    2. Clinical College of Jining Medical University, Jining 272067, China
    3. Shandong Digestive Disease Prevention Center of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jining 272033, China
  • Received:2018-05-28 Published:2019-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Lingbin Kong
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Kong Lingbin, Email:
引用本文:

陈星宇, 孔令斌, 张帆, 方萧, 张永超, 杨景玉. 沙棘干乳剂对小鼠食管上皮内瘤变的阻断作用初探[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2019, 07(01): 54-58.

Xingyu Chen, Lingbin Kong, Fan Zhang, Xiao Fang, Yongchao Zhang, Jingyu Yang. Blocking effect of seabuckthorn emulsion on esophageal intraepithelial neoplasia in mice[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(01): 54-58.

目的

建立化学致癌剂4-硝基喹啉-1-氧化物(4NQO)诱导的小鼠食管癌前病变模型,探讨沙棘干乳剂对食管上皮内瘤变的阻断作用。

方法

选取145只健康昆明雄性小鼠,按照随机数字表法分为A、B、C、D 4组,其中A组(空白对照组,n=10,正常饮食、饮蒸馏水,不施加干预)、B组(4NQO诱癌组,n=45)、C组(沙棘干乳剂治疗组,n=45)和D组(全反式维甲酸组,n=45)。B、C、D 3组均于实验开始第1天至第14周末,自由饮用浓度0.1 g/ml的4NQO水溶液,直至第14周末时小鼠食管癌前病变模型建立成功,B、C和D组分别给予蒸馏水、沙棘干乳剂和全反式维甲酸灌胃,分别于第19周末处死解剖小鼠A组2只,B组、C组和D组小鼠各20只,第24周末处死解剖小鼠A组2只、B组16只、C组25只和D组25只,通过苏木精-伊红(HE)染色和病理组织学检测方法观察并比较各组小鼠食管上皮黏膜组织变化情况,分析沙棘干乳剂对小鼠食管上皮内瘤变的作用。

结果

小鼠喂养19周前B组、C组和D各组小鼠食管上皮黏膜组织增生变化不明显。24周后C组和D组小鼠食管高级别上皮内瘤变率分别为60.00%(15/25)和52.00%(13/25),两组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.85,P>0.05),但均明显低于B组93.75%(15/16)(χ2=3.97,4.22;均P<0.05);C组和D组小鼠食管低级别上皮内瘤变率分别为40.00%(10/25)和48.00%(12/25),两组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.68,P>0.05),均明显高于B组6.25%(1/16)(χ2=5.66,7.86;均P<0.05)。

结论

沙棘干乳剂对食管上皮内瘤变有一定的阻断作用,可阻断其向高级别瘤变发展,但还不能明确沙棘干乳剂对上皮内瘤变有治疗或逆转作用。

Objective

To establish a mouse model of esophageal precancerous lesion induced by chemical carcinogen 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4NQO), and to investigate the blocking effect of seabuckthorn emulsion on esophageal intraepithelial neoplasia.

Methods

One hundred and forty-five healthy Kunming male mice were randomly divided into four groups: group A (blank control group, n=10, normal diet, drinking distilled water without intervention), group B (4NQO induced cancer group, n=45), group C (seabuckthorn emulsion treatment group, n=45) and group D (all-trans retinoic acid treatment group, n=45). Group B, C and D all drank the 4NQO solution of 0.1 g/ml freely from the first day to the 14th weekend, until the mouse esophageal precancerous lesion model was established successfully. Group B, C and D were given distilled water, seabuckthorn emulsion and all-trans retinoic acid respectively by intragastric administration. At the 19th weekend, 2 mice in group A, 20 mice in group B, 20 mice in group C and 20 mice in group D were executed. At the 24th weekend, 2 mice in group A, 16 mice in group B, 25 mice in group C and 25 mice in group D were executed. Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining and histopathological examination were used to observe and compare the changes of esophageal epithelial mucosa in each group of mice, and the effect of seabuckthorn emulsion on esophageal intraepithelial neoplasia in mice was analyzed.

Results

There were no significant changes in the proliferation of esophageal epithelial tissues among the B, C and D groups before 19 w feeding. After 24 weeks, the esophageal high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia rates in C and D groups were 60.00%(15/25) and 52.00%(13/25), respectively, with no significant difference (χ2=0.85, P>0.05), which were significantly lower than those in group B [93.75% (15/16) (χ2=3.97, 4.22, all P<0.05)]. The esophageal low grade intraepithelial neoplasia rates were 40.00% (10/25) and 48.00% (12/25) in group C and D respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=2.68, P>0.05), which were significantly higher than that in group B [6.25% (1/16) (χ2=5.66, 7.86, all P<0.05)].

Conclusion

Seabuckthorn emulsion has a certain blocking effect on esophageal intraepithelial neoplasia, which can block its development to high-grade neoplasia, but it is not clear that seabuckthorn emulsion has a therapeutic or reversal effect on esophageal intraepithelial neoplasia.

表1 各组小鼠喂养第19周后食管上皮黏膜组织病变情况比较(例)
表2 各组小鼠喂养24周后食管上皮黏膜组织病变情况比较(例)
[1]
李凯,赵卫星,鲍永华,等.胃炎、食管炎和食管癌患者血清中人丝氨酸蛋白酶8的表达及临床意义[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2016,4(1):45-47.
[2]
马丹,杨帆,廖专,等.中国早期食管癌筛查及内镜诊治专家共识意见(2014年,北京)[J].中国实用内科杂志,2015,35(4):320-337.
[3]
王立东.食管和贲门癌癌变多阶段演进机制[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2006,13(5):321-324.
[4]
Wang GQ, Abnet CC, Shen Q, et al. Histological precursors of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma:results from a 13 year prospective follow up study in a high risk population[J].Gut, 2005,54(2):187-192.
[5]
桑露倩,李娜,王映,等.全反式维甲酸对食管癌KYSE70细胞增殖、迁移及Notch1、DLL4、VEGF-C表达的影响[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2018,53(4):405-409.
[6]
Xing J, Yang B, Dong Y,et al.Effects of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) seed and pulp oils on experimental models of gastric ulcer in rats[J]. Fitoterapia, 2002, 73(7/8):644-650.
[7]
杨景玉,孔令斌.芪莲舒痞颗粒对食管鳞状上皮不典型增生的治疗作用[J].医学信息(中旬刊),2011,21(7):3258-3259.
[8]
Bowles DW, Keysar SB, Eagles JR, et al. A pilot study of cetuximab and the hedgehog inhibitor IPI-926 in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J].Oral Oncol,2016(53):74-79.
[9]
Campbell VT, Nadesan P, Ali SA,et al.Hedgehog pathway inhibition in chondrosarcoma using the smoothened inhibitor IPI-926 directly inhibits sarcoma cell growth[J].Mol Cancer Ther,2014,13(5):1259-1269.
[10]
王建馗,刘楠.沙棘干乳剂对消化性溃疡的疗效研究[J].河北医药,2015(19):2975-2976.
[11]
Huff NK, Auer AD, Garza F Jr,et al.Effect of sea buckthorn berries and pulp in a liquid emulsion on gastric ulcer scores and gastric juice pH in horses[J].J Vet Intern Med,2012,26(5):1186-1191.
[12]
赵波,向晓玲,王微,等.沙棘黄酮制备及体外抑制人前列腺癌PC-3细胞作用研究[J].天然产物研究与开发,2018,30(1):27-32,160.
[13]
Padmavathi B, Upreti M, Singh V, et al. Chemoprevention by Hippophae rhamnoides:effects on tumorigenesis, phase II and antioxidant enzymes, and IRF-1 transcription factor[J].Nutr Cancer,2005,51(1):59-67.
[14]
Wang X, Liu J, Zhang X,et al.Seabuckthorn berry polysaccharide extracts protect against acetaminophen induced hepatotoxicity in mice via activating the Nrf-2/HO-1-SOD-2 signaling pathway[J].Phytomedicine,2018(38):90-97.
[15]
郑满荣,吕晓玲,王建新,等.3种沙棘油的主要成分及抗氧化能力比较[J].食品研究与开发,2018,38(333):24-29.
[16]
Ganju L, Padwad Y, Singh R, et al. Anti-inflammatory activity of Seabuckthorn ( Hippophae rhamnoides ) leaves[J]. Int Immunopharmacol,2005,5(12),1675-1684.
[1] 李璐璐, 马利红, 金佳佳, 谷伟. 干扰素基因刺激因子通过肺巨噬细胞胞葬功能调控急性肺损伤小鼠修复的研究[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 97-103.
[2] 李玉萍, 马会, 禹航. 腹腔镜下子宫动脉阻断术联合子宫肌瘤切除术治疗子宫肌瘤临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 238-244.
[3] 蒋冉, 邹彩艳, 桑谊荃. 宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ患者血清性激素水平及其与高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染的关系[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 683-688.
[4] 唐亦骁, 陈峻, 连正星, 胡海涛, 鲁迪, 徐骁, 卫强. 白果内酯对小鼠肝缺血再灌注损伤保护作用研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 278-282.
[5] 张礼刚, 邹志辉, 许顺, 蔡可可, 胡永涛, 梁朝朝. 酒精对慢性非细菌性前列腺炎中T淋巴细胞变化的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-81.
[6] 杨阳, 王琤, 周文土, 周冰. Caveolae/Caveolin-1与膜胆固醇共同调控小鼠BMSCs成骨分化[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 137-142.
[7] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
[8] 唐亦骁, 何心渝, 徐骁, 卫强. 肝切除术中肝血流控制技术研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 134-139.
[9] 陈园园, 颜宏利. 遗传性结直肠癌的基因阻断[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 1-5.
[10] 朱泽超, 杨新宇, 李侑埕, 潘鹏宇, 梁国标. 染料木黄酮通过SIRT1/p53信号通路对蛛网膜下腔出血后早期脑损伤的作用[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 261-269.
[11] 蒋心怡, 顾丹丹, 叶艳, 缪佳蓉. RNA测序研究抗菌肽KT2治疗溃疡性结肠炎的作用机制[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 8-15.
[12] 王淑友, 宋晓晶, 贾术永, 王广军, 张维波. 肝脏去唾液酸糖蛋白受体靶向活体荧光成像评估酒精性肝损伤肝脏功能的研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 443-446.
[13] 刘光华, 欧阳强, 俞炬明, 范国平, 欧敬民, 邱明科, 林霏开, 孙会贞, 张惠, 汪希鹏, 金敏菲. 双侧髂内动脉球囊阻断序贯子宫动脉栓塞辅助下剖宫产的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 33-38.
[14] 胡瑞芳, 樊丽娟. 食管鳞状上皮内瘤变诊断的生物标志物研究进展及其非内镜治疗现状[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 281-286.
[15] 中国抗癌协会食管癌专业委员会. 机器人辅助食管切除术中国临床专家共识(2023版)[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 1-15.
阅读次数
全文


摘要