切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (01) : 48 -53. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2019.01.010

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

基础研究

经颅电刺激运动诱发电位对急性坐骨神经损伤兔模型的评估价值
周云飞1, 郝帅2, 宋启民3,()   
  1. 1. 256600 滨州医学院
    2. 274900 巨野县人民医院神经外科
    3. 276000 临沂市人民医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-27 出版日期:2019-02-26
  • 通信作者: 宋启民
  • 基金资助:
    山东医药卫生科技发展计划面上项目(2015WS0375)

Evaluation value of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential in acute sciatic nerve injury model of rabbits

Yunfei Zhou1, Shuai Hao2, Qimin Song3,()   

  1. 1. Binzhou Medical College, Binzhou 274900, China
    2. Department of Neurosurgery, Juye County People′s Hospital, Juye 274900, China
    3. Department of Neurosurgery, Linyi City People′s Hospital, Linyi 276000, China
  • Received:2018-06-27 Published:2019-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Qimin Song
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Song Qimin, Email:
引用本文:

周云飞, 郝帅, 宋启民. 经颅电刺激运动诱发电位对急性坐骨神经损伤兔模型的评估价值[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2019, 07(01): 48-53.

Yunfei Zhou, Shuai Hao, Qimin Song. Evaluation value of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential in acute sciatic nerve injury model of rabbits[J]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(01): 48-53.

目的

探讨经颅电刺激运动诱发电位(TceMEP)对发现兔急性坐骨神经根损伤的敏感性及TceMEP早期波形变化对急性坐骨神经根部损伤的评估价值。

方法

新西兰大白兔12只24条坐骨神经随机区组法分3组,实验组分为1个血管夹组(n=8),2个血管夹组(n=8)和对照组(n=8);实验组分别应用1个或2个血管夹夹压坐骨神经根部建立急性坐骨神经损伤模型,观察并记录2 h坐骨神经根部受夹压损伤急性期TceMEP的变化特点,并记录TceMEP波形稳定后的波幅与基线波幅比值和潜伏期;对照组仅手术分离出坐骨神经而不夹压坐骨神经,用于排除麻醉药和手术操作对TceMEP的影响;2 d后应用Tarlov评分对各组兔下肢运动功能进行评估。应用配对t检验,单因素方差分析,秩和检验和Speraman相关性进行统计学分析。

结果

实验组1个血管夹组经过[0.20(0.00,0.431)]min TceMEP波形开始变化,经过[2.60(1.40,3.35)]min波形平稳;2个血管夹组经过[0.35(0.05,1.63)]min TceMEP波形开始变化,经过[4.45(2.83,5.65)]min波形平稳。1个和2个血管夹组手术后TceMEP波形平稳后波幅与基线波幅百分比[(49.84±15.27)%,(15.47±12.64)%]均低于手术前[(100.00±0.00)%,(100.00±0.00)%],均差异有统计学意义(t=9.293,18.912;均P<0.01);对照组和实验各组手术后TceMEP波形平稳后波幅与基线波幅百分比比较,差异有统计学意义(F=110.196,P<0.05)。1个和2个血管夹组手术后TceMEP波形平稳后潜伏期[(12.60±0.61)ms,(14.29±1.24)ms]高于手术前TceMEP潜伏期[(12.21±0.59)ms,(12.31±1.10)ms],均差异有统计学意义(t=7.519,5.721;均P<0.05);对照组和实验各组手术后TceMEP波形平稳后潜伏期比较,差异有统计学意义(F=6.702,P<0.05)。1个血管夹组和2个血管夹组夹压后2 d下肢运动功能评分[4.00(3.00,4.00), 2.50(2.00,3.00)],低于夹压前[5.00(5.00,5.00),5.00(5.00,5.00)],均差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.598,-2.585;均P<0.05),且均低于对照组[5.00(5.00,5.00)],均差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.664,-3.651;均P<0.05)。对照组和实验组各组手术后波形平稳后波幅与基线波幅百分比与各组坐骨神经损伤手术后2 d的运动功能评分呈显著性正相关(r=0.844,P<0.01)。

结论

TceMEP监测对发现急性坐骨神经根损伤非常敏感,表现为潜伏期延长和波幅降低,为采取保护性措施预防不可逆性神经根损伤的发生提供了可能;TceMEP波形变化可以预测下肢运动神经功能。

Objective

To explore the sensitivity of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential (TceMEP) after acute sciatic nerve root injury in rabbits and the evaluation value of its early waveform changes after acute sciatic nerve root injury.

Methods

Twelve New Zealand rabbits with 24 sciatic nerves were divided into 3 groups by random grouping method, one vascular clamping group (n=8), two vascular clamping groups (n=8) and the control group (n=8). The acute sciatic nerve injury model was established by using one or two vascular clamp compression of the sciatic nerve root, the TceMEP was recorded for 2 hours to observe the characteristics of TceMEP in the acute phase of sciatic nerve root compression injury, the percentage of TceMEP amplitude of stabilized waveform after compression injury to baseline amplitude and latency were recorded. The control group was used to exclude the effects of anesthetic and surgical operations on TceMEP. The lower limb motor function was evaluated using the Tarlov score after 2 days of clamping. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test, one-way ANOVA, rank sum test and spearman correlation analysis.

Results

TceMEP waveform of 1 vascular clamping group was changed at [0.20(0.00, 0.43)]min and was stable at [2.60(1.40, 3.35)]min; TceMEP waveform of 2 vascular clamping group was changed at [(0.35(0.05, 1.63)]min and was stable at [4.45(2.83, 5.65)]min. The percentage of postoperative amplitude when the waveform was stable to baseline in 1 and 2 vascular clamping group [(49.84±15.27)%, (15.47±12.64)%] were lower than the percentage of preoperative amplitude [(100.00±0.00)%, (100.00±0.00)%], there were statistically significant differences (t=9.293, 18.912, all P<0.01). There was statistically significant difference between the control group and the experimental groups in the percentage of postoperative amplitude when the waveform was stable to baseline (F=110.196, P<0.05). The postoperative latency when the waveform was stable in 1 and 2 vascular clamping groups [(12.60±0.61)ms, (14.29±1.24) ms] were higher than the preoperative latency [(12.21±0.59)ms, (12.31±1.10)ms], there were statistically significant differences (t=7.519, 5.721, all P<0.05). There was statistically significant difference of the postoprative latency in the control group and the experimental groups (F=6.702, P<0.05). The lower limb motor function scores after 2 days of clamping in 1 and 2 vascular clamping groups [4.00(3.00, 4.00), 2.50(2.00, 3.00)] were lower than the control group [5.00(5.00, 5.00)], there were statistically significant differences (Z=-3.664, -3.651, all P<0.05), which were also lower than the motor function scores before clamping [5.00(5.00, 5.00), 5.00(5.00, 5.00)], there were statistically significant differences (Z=-2.598, -2.585, all P<0.05). The percentage of postoperative amplitude when the waveform was stable to baseline and the Tarlov motor function scores after 2 days of clamping were significantly positively correlated in the control group and experimental groups (r=0.844, P<0.01).

Conclusions

TceMEP monitoring is very sensitive to the detection of acute sciatic nerve root injury, which is manifested as prolonged latency and decreased ampilitude, it provides the possibility of taking protective measures to prevent the occurrence of irreversible nerve root injury. The motor function of lower limbs can be predicted by the change of TceMEP waveform.

表1 对照组兔麻醉后不同时间TceMEP波幅和潜伏期变化比较(±s)
表2 对照组兔手术前后不同时间TceMEP波幅和潜伏期变化比较(±s)
表3 兔坐骨神经手术夹压前后TceMEP波幅与基线波幅比较(%,±s)
表4 实验组兔坐骨神经手术夹压前后TceMEP潜伏期比较(ms,±s)
表5 兔坐骨神经夹压前后下肢运动功能评分比较[分,M(QL,QU)]
[1]
Saini N, Zaidi M, Barry MT,et al.Previously unreported complications associated with integrated cage screws following anterior lumbar interbody fusion:report of 2 cases[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2018,28(3):311-316.
[2]
Collados-Maestre I, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Bas-Hermida T,et al.Transdiscal screw versus pedicle screw fixation for high-grade L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis in patients younger than 60 years:a case-control study[J].Eur Spine J,2016,25(6):1806-1812.
[3]
陈春美,赵伟,宋启民,等. F波在兔坐骨神经损伤急性期的变化[J]. 中华实验外科杂志,2016 ,33(11):2546-2548.
[4]
Dusad T, Kundnani V, Dutta S,et al.Comparative prospective study reporting intraoperative parameters,pedicle screw perforation, and radiation exposure in navigation-guided versus non-navigated fluoroscopy-assisted minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J].Asian Spine J,2018,12(2):309-316.
[5]
Dunn C, Faloon M, Milman E,et al.Accuracy and safety of percutaneous lumbosacral pedicle screw placement using dual-planar intraoperative fluoroscopy[J].Asian Spine J,2018,12(2):238-245.
[6]
Kwan MK, Chiu CK, Lee CK,et al.Comparison between percutaneous fluoroscopic-guided and conventional open pedicle screw placement techniques for the thoracic spine:a safety evaluation in human cadavers[J]. Bone Joint J,2015,97-B(11):1555-1561.
[7]
Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T,et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion:a retroospective study of complications after facet joint excision and pedicle fixation in 148 cases[J].Acta Orthop Scand,1999,70(4):329-334.
[8]
Raley DA, Mobbs RJ.Retrospective computed tomography scan analysis of percutaneously inserted pedicle screws for posterior transpedicular stabilization of the thoracic and lumbar spine:accuracy and complication rates[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2012,37(12):1092-1100.
[9]
Houten JK, Nasser R, Baxi N.Clinical assessment of percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement using the O-arm multidimensional surgical imaging system[J].Neurosurgery,2012,70(4):990-995.
[10]
Hahn P, Oezdemir S, Komp M,et al.A new electromagnetic navigation system for pedicle screws placement:a human cadaver study at the lumbar spine[J].PloS one,2015,10(7):1-10.
[11]
Laudato PA, Pierzchala K, Schizas C. Pedicle screw insertion accuracy using O-arm, robotic guidance, or freehand technique:a comparative study[J].Spine,2018,43(6):E373-E378.
[12]
Wang H, Liu Y, Zhao Y,et al.Feasibility and accuracy of computer-assisted individual drill guide template for minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw placement trajectory[J].Injury,2018,49(3):644-648.
[13]
王庆贺,杨大志,李子艺,等.特殊临床表现的椎管内外巨大哑铃型神经鞘瘤诊断学特征[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2014,(1):43-48.
[14]
章旭,孟纯阳.经皮椎体成形术及后凸成形术后责任椎体邻近椎间盘退变因素分析及临床诊断[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2016,4(3):213-215.
[15]
Chen Y, Wang BP, Yang J,et al. Neurophysiological monitoring of lumbar spinal nerve roots:a case report of postoperative deficit and literature review[J].Int J Surg Case Rep,2017(30):218-221.
[16]
Zhuang Q, Wang S, Zhang J, et al. How to make the best use of intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring? Experience in 1 162 consecutive spinal deformity surgical procedures[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2014, 39(24):1425-1432.
[17]
宋启民,费昶,杨卫忠.兔腰动脉对脊髓的供血特点及价值[J].中华显微外科杂志,2012,35(6):482-484.
[18]
宋启民,费昶,陈春美.运动诱发电位对兔腹主动脉阻断脊髓损伤的预警[J].中华实验外科杂志,2015,32(6):1386-1386.
[19]
宋启民,杨卫忠,陈春美,等.经颅电刺激运动诱发电位术中监测预防脊髓缺血性损伤的实验研究[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2010(3):127-130.
[20]
Sharan A, Groff MW, ailey AT,et al. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 15:electrophysiological monitoring and lumbar fusion[J]. J Neurosurg Spine,2014,21(1):102-105.
[1] 郭雪芹, 张丹, 李杨, 李燕东, 闫丹丹. 油酸型家兔肺损伤模型的超声与血气变化的相关性[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(07): 549-554.
[2] 李娜, 刘晓娜, 郑海宁, 温朝阳. 肾脏中部及下极皮质杨氏模量值差异的动物实验研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(04): 309-312.
[3] 益磋, 王亚辉, 陈重, 高文宏, 刘政. 超声空化促进乙醇消融兔肝脏的实验研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(12): 948-954.
[4] 李娜, 刘晓娜, 郑海宁, 韩宜晓, 叶庆桂, 沈涛, 温朝阳. 兔急性肾动脉狭窄对肾脏组织弹性的影响[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(03): 232-235.
[5] 严俊, 余舒莹, 王萍萍, 廖莉, 陈晓瑾. 苦参碱生物黏附凝胶对家兔口腔溃疡的疗效研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(02): 98-102.
[6] 徐宝华, 杨晓静, 朱云, 邰宁正, 孙炳伟. 中药复春散2号抑制兔耳增生性瘢痕的实验研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2018, 13(06): 462-464.
[7] 黄江龙, 郑宗珩, 叶小龙, 陈图锋, 魏波, 刘健培, 黄勇, 方佳峰, 卫洪波. 新型纳米仿生补片修复兔腹壁疝模型的实验研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(02): 85-88.
[8] 陶开亮, 高兴, 顾庆陟, 李承铎, 樊雪鹏, 田征. 兔关节软骨下骨缺损骨移植后移植骨组织学变化实验研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(03): 154-159.
[9] 李玉龙, 焦龙兵, 郑连生. 液氮冷冻法制备兔股骨头坏死模型新方法及效果评估[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 263-268.
[10] 李声华, 李冬, 陈璟莉, 严虹. LPSB及CSEA麻醉方案用于老年髋部骨折术中的麻醉效果及患者血流动力学观察研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(12): 978-983.
[11] 李世凯, 梁佳, 何艳艳, 于毅, 李天晓, 常金龙, 贺迎坤. 兔颈动脉粥样硬化性狭窄模型在介入治疗的应用进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 357-362.
[12] 刘新献, 王雅琪, 周斌, 郭严延. 雷帕霉素在兔腐蚀性食管炎性狭窄早期干预中的意义[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 324-329.
[13] 于婷, 亚白柳, 成洪聚, 辛青, 许飞, 李雷. 烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸磷酸氧化酶4阻断剂对糖尿病神经病变大鼠坐骨神经凋亡的影响[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2020, 08(02): 135-140.
[14] 王群, 李嘉, 缪珩. 超声造影在评价兔糖尿病肾病模型微循环灌注中的应用价值[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2020, 08(01): 9-13.
[15] 庞英, 梁明亭, 马建群, 杨永, 张静. 重组人促红细胞生成素对兔心肌缺血再灌注损伤的保护作用及其机制研究[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2017, 05(01): 1-6.
阅读次数
全文


摘要