切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (02) : 114 -117. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2019.02.009

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

神经梅毒患者血清及脑脊液免疫学指标诊断特征分析
杨希帅1, 黄达1, 赵丽丽1, 矫黎东2,()   
  1. 1. 046000 长治市人民医院神经内科
    2. 100032 北京,首都医科大学附属宣武医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-05 出版日期:2019-05-26
  • 通信作者: 矫黎东

Analysis of immunological diagnostic characteristics in serum and cerebrospinal fluid of neurosyphilis patients

Xishuai Yang1, Da Huang1, Lili Zhao1, Lidong Jiao2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurology, Changzhi People′ Hospital, Changzhi 046000, China
    2. Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Captial Medical University, Beijing 100032, China
  • Received:2018-11-05 Published:2019-05-26
  • Corresponding author: Lidong Jiao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Jiao Lidong, Email:
引用本文:

杨希帅, 黄达, 赵丽丽, 矫黎东. 神经梅毒患者血清及脑脊液免疫学指标诊断特征分析[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2019, 07(02): 114-117.

Xishuai Yang, Da Huang, Lili Zhao, Lidong Jiao. Analysis of immunological diagnostic characteristics in serum and cerebrospinal fluid of neurosyphilis patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(02): 114-117.

目的

探讨神经梅毒患者血清及脑脊液免疫学诊断特点。

方法

选取2013年6月至2016年7月首都医科大学附属宣武医院收治的35例神经梅毒患者,其中32例患者行血清与脑脊液免疫学指标检测,回顾性分析35例患者的检查结果,应用Fisher精确检验比较血清组与脑脊液组IgA、IgM的差异,应用卡方检验比较血清组与脑脊液组IgG的差异,并对脑脊液寡克隆条带阳性检出率和脑脊液24 h IgG合成率进行分析。

结果

32例神经梅毒患者检测血清免疫球蛋白,有53.13%(17/32)的患者IgG升高,6.25%(2/32)的患者IgA升高,0%(0/32)的患者IgM升高;脑脊液中,有84.38%(27/32)的患者IgG升高,100.00%(32/32)的患者IgA升高,90.63%(29/32)的患者IgM升高;血清与脑脊液IgA、IgM升高率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),IgG升高率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=7.27,P>0.05)。25例神经梅毒患者行CSF寡克隆电泳,IgG寡克隆条带阳性率为100.00%(25/25),96.00%(24/25)患者脑脊液24 h IgG合成率升高。

结论

神经梅毒临床表现多样,是易误诊的可治性疾病。血清及脑脊液IgG多表现为升高,脑脊液IgA、IgM多表现为升高而血清IgA、IgM多表现为正常,脑脊液寡克隆条带阳性,脑脊液24 h IgG合成率升高等免疫学特点对神经梅毒诊断有意义。

Objective

To explore immunological diagnostic characteristics in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of neurosyphilis patients.

Methods

Thirty-five patients with neurosyphilis admitted to Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University during June 2013 to July 2016 were selected for retrospective analysis, including 32 patients with serum and CSF immunological test results. Fisher exact test was used to compare the differences of IgA and IgM between serum group and cerebrospinal fluid group meanwhile, the difference of IgG between serum and cerebrospinal fluid group was compared using Chi-square test. The positive detection rate of oligoclonal bands (OB) and the 24-hour synthesis rate of immunoglobulin in cerebrospinal fluid were also analyzed.

Results

Serum and CSF Immunoglobulin levels were in 32 patients with neurosyphilis. In serum group, IgG level elevated in 53.13%(17/32) patients, IgA level elevated in 6.25% (2/32) patients, and IgM level elevated in 0% (0/32) patient. Nevertheless, CSF-IgG increased in 84.38% (27/32) patients, CSF-IgA increased in 100.00% (32/32) patients and CSF-IgM increased in 90.63% (29/32) patients. There were statistically significant differences in the elevation rate of IgA and IgM between the serum and cerebrospinal fluid group (χ2=56.47, 53.03, P<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the elevation rate of IgG between the two groups(χ2=7.27, P>0.05). The positive rate of oligoclonal band in cerebrospinal fluid was as high as 100.00%, the 24-hour synthesis rate of immunoglobulin in cerebrospinal fluid increased in 96.00% (24/25) patients.

Conclusions

Neurosyphilis, with various clinical manifastations, is a treatable and easily misdiagnosed disease. Humoral immunity may play an important role in its development. Serum and CSF IgG increase, CSF IgA and IgM elevation and serum IgA and IgM are normal, CSF OB positive, CSF-24 h IgG synthetic ratio elevation are meaningful immunological characteristics for neurosyphilis diagnosis.

表1 神经梅毒患者脑脊液常规及生化检查结果
表2 神经梅毒患者血清与脑脊液中IgG、IgA、IgM水平变化情况比较(例,%)
图1 神经梅素患者脑脊液寡克隆电泳图像
[1]
Berger JR, Dean D.Neurosyphilis[J].Handb Clin Neurol,2014(121):1461-1472.
[2]
Jantzen SU, Ferrea S, Langebner T,et al.Late-stage neurosyphilis presenting with severe neuropsychiatric decits:diagnosis,therapy,and course of three patients[J].J Neurol,2012,259(4):720-728.
[3]
Mao S, Liu Z.Neurosyphilis manifesting as lightning pain[J].Eur J Dermatol,2009,19(5):504-506.
[4]
Lin LR, Tong ML, Fu ZG, et al. Evaluation of a colloidal gold immunochromatography assay in the detection of Treponema pallidum specic IgM antibody in syphilis serofast reaction patients:a serologic marker for the relapse and infection of syphilis[J].Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2011,70(1):10-16.
[5]
余茜.体液免疫在神经梅毒中枢神经系统中启动、维持和调控机制的研究[D].合肥:安徽医科大学,2017.
[6]
王千秋,张国成.性传播疾病临床诊疗指南[M].上海:上海科技出版社,2007:16-17.
[7]
McGettrick P, Ferguson W, Jackson V,et al.Syphilis serology in pregnancy:an eight-year study(2005-2012)in a large teaching maternity hospital in Dublin,Ireland[J].Int J STD AIDS,2016,27(3):226-230.
[8]
Kingston M, French P, Higgins S,et al.UK national guidelines on the management of syphilis 2015[J].Int J STD AIDS,2016,27(6):421-446.
[9]
Ho EL, Tantalo LC, Jones T,et al.Point of care treponemal tests for neurosyphilis diagnosis[J].Sex Transm Dis,2015,42(1):48-52.
[10]
Marra CM, Tantalo LC, Sahi SK,et al.Cxcl13 as a cerebrospinal fluid marker for neurosyphilis in HIV-infected patients with syphilis[J].Sex Transm Dis,2010,37(5):283-287.
[11]
陈莉,常文娇,戴媛媛,等.41例梅毒患者脑脊液检测结果分析[J].临床输血与检验,2018,20(4):434-436.
[12]
石强,郭钊云.神经梅毒患者脑脊液蛋白质含量与其预后的相关性研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2015,14(15):1275-1277.
[13]
潘宝龙,孔繁林,张秀琴.脑脊液免疫球蛋白测定的临床应用[J].现代诊断与治疗,2007,18(3):151-152.
[14]
Liu LL, Zhang HL, Huang SJ,et al.Assessing cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities in neurosyphilis patients without human immunodeficiency virus infection[J].Int Immunopharmacol,2013,17(4):1120-1124.
[15]
程莎莎,许绍强,陈玲玲.寡克隆条带与脑脊液细胞学检测对神经梅毒疾病的临床诊断意义[J].国际检验医学杂志,2016,37(13):1857-1858.
[16]
杨志寅.临床思维与临床决策[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2015,3(2):79-83.
[1] 戴睿, 张亮, 陈浏阳, 张永博, 吴丕根, 孙华, 杨盛, 孟博. 肠道菌群与椎间盘退行性变相关性的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 546-549.
[2] 张洁, 罗小霞, 余鸿. 系统性免疫炎症指数对急性胰腺炎患者并发器官功能损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 68-71.
[3] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[4] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[5] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[6] 司钦亮, 毕世龙, 焦慧骁, 李世照, 陈哲禹, 武玉东. 精索去分化脂肪肉瘤两例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 585-590.
[7] 林逸, 钟文龙, 李锴文, 何旺, 林天歆. 广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊(第15期)——转移性膀胱癌的综合治疗[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 648-652.
[8] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[9] 陈伟杰, 何小东. 胆囊癌免疫靶向治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 763-768.
[10] 魏志鸿, 刘建勇, 吴小雅, 杨芳, 吕立志, 江艺, 蔡秋程. 肝移植术后急性移植物抗宿主病的诊治(附四例报告)[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 846-851.
[11] 张龙, 孙善柯, 徐伟, 李文柱, 李俊达, 池涌泉, 何广胜, 成峰, 王学浩, 饶建华. 腹腔镜脾切除治疗血液系统疾病的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 870-875.
[12] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[13] 杨菲, 刘腾飞, 赵志军, 李睿聪, 张颉, 刘妍, 赵珍. 血清维生素水平与分化型甲状腺癌的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 633-640.
[14] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[15] 王昌前, 林婷婷, 宁雨露, 王颖杰, 谭文勇. 光免疫治疗在肿瘤领域的临床应用新进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 575-583.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?