切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (03) : 203 -206. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2019.03.014

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

结直肠癌患者脉管侵犯的危险因素及预后分析
桑温昌1,(), 李兆德1, 张晓东1, 董玉昕1, 王健1   
  1. 1. 250021 济南,槐荫人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-04 出版日期:2019-08-26
  • 通信作者: 桑温昌

Analysis of risk factors and prognosis on vascular invasion in patients with colorectal cancer

Wenchang Sang1,(), Zhaode Li1, Xiaodong Zhang1, Yuxin Dong1, Jian Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Huaiyin People′s Hospital, Jinan 250021, China
  • Received:2019-04-04 Published:2019-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Wenchang Sang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sang Wenchang, Email:
引用本文:

桑温昌, 李兆德, 张晓东, 董玉昕, 王健. 结直肠癌患者脉管侵犯的危险因素及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2019, 07(03): 203-206.

Wenchang Sang, Zhaode Li, Xiaodong Zhang, Yuxin Dong, Jian Wang. Analysis of risk factors and prognosis on vascular invasion in patients with colorectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(03): 203-206.

目的

探讨结直肠癌患者脉管侵犯的危险因素及其对预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2013年12月济南市槐荫人民医院胃肠外科收治并行根治性手术治疗的319例结直肠癌患者的临床病理资料,收集患者术后肿瘤标本,采用免疫组织化学染色检测肿瘤标本的脉管侵犯情况,采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法分析脉管侵犯与临床病理资料之间的关系,采用Kaplan-Meier法分析脉管侵犯对结直肠癌患者生存预后(随访截至2018年12月)的影响,采用Logistic多因素回归模型分析脉管侵犯的独立危险因素。

结果

319例患者,脉管侵犯率为28.84%(92/319),低分化者脉管侵犯率为37.08%(33/89),高于高-中分化者25.65%(59/230),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.08,P=0.043);T3和T4分期患者脉管侵犯率分别为31.33%(26/83)和34.09%(60/176),高于T1和T2期患者的11.11%(1/9)和9.80%(5/51)(χ2=12.99,P=0.005);肿瘤位于升结肠52例,横结肠27例,降结肠19例,乙状结肠53例,直肠168例,其脉管侵犯率分别是28.85%(15/52)、7.41%(2/27)、10.53%(2/19)、20.75%(11/53)、36.90%(62/168),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=16.16,P=0.003)。有淋巴结转移者脉管侵犯率为41.53%(49/118),高于无淋巴结转移者21.39%(43/201),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=14.68,P=0.000)。多因素分析显示T分期为T3、T4期(RR=6.563,95%CI=0.302~0.992,P=0.047)和淋巴结转移(RR=5.618,95%CI=1.142~2.293,P=0.007)是结直肠癌患者脉管侵犯的独立危险因素。全组319例患者中有297例获得随访,随访率为93.10%(297/319),中位随访时间38(8~71)个月。全组患者5年生存率为55.56%(165/297),其中脉管侵犯患者5年生存率为45.12%(37/82),低于无脉管侵犯的59.53%(128/215)(χ2=4.99,P=0.025)。

结论

T分期为T3、T4期、淋巴结转移的结直肠癌患者有较高的脉管侵犯风险,脉管侵犯可能提示结直肠患者预后不良。

Objective

To investigate the risk factors of vascular invasion in patients with colorectal cancer, and to explore the influence of vascular invasion on the prognosis.

Methods

The clinicopathological data of 319 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent radical resection from January 2010 to December 2013 in the Huaiyin People′s Hospital of Jinan were retrospectively analyzed, surgical specimens in all patients were collected and detected by immunohistochemical staining. The relationship between vascular invasion and clinicopathological factors of colorectal cancer were analyzed by chi square test or Fishers exact test. The influence of vascular invasion on overall survival was investigated with Kaplan-Meier curve, and the independent risk factors influencing vascular invasion were identified with Logistic regression.

Results

The incidence of vascular invasion in patients with low differentiated tumor was 37.08%(33/89), which was significantly higher than that in those with middle-high differentiated tumor 25.65% (59/230), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.08, P=0.043). Vascular invasion detection rate was higher in T3 (31.33%, 26/83) and T4 (34.09%, 60/176) group than those in T1 (11.11%, 1/9)and T2 (9.80%, 5/51)(χ2=12.99, P=0.005). Tumors of 52 cases located in the ascending colon, 27 cases in the transverse colon, 19 cases in the descending colon, 53 cases in the sigmoid colon, and 168 cases in the rectum, the vascular invasion rates were 28.85%(15/52), 7.41%(2/27), 10.53%(2/19), 20.75%(11/53), 36.90%(62/168) respectively, the difference was statistically significant(χ2=16.16, P=0.003). The incidence of vascular invasion in patients with lymph node metastasis was 41.53%(49/118), which was significantly higher than that in those without lymph node metastasis (21.39%, 43/201) (χ2=14.68, P=0.000). The results of multivariate analysis showed that T3, T4 state (RR=6.563, 95%CI=0.302-0.992, P=0.047) and lymph node metastasis (RR=5.618, 95%CI=1.142-2.293, P=0.007) were independent risk factors for vascular invasion in colorectal cancer patients. Among 319 colorectal cancer patients, 297 patients were followed up (93.10%) for 8-71 months, the median follow-up time was 38 months. The 5-year survival rate was 45.12% in patients with vascular invasion and 59.93% without vascular invasion, which was significantly different (χ2=4.99, P=0.025).

Conclusion

The risk of vascular invasion is higher in colorectal cancer patients with T3, T4 state and lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion is a poor prognostic factor in colorctal cancer patients.

表1 319例结直肠癌患者不同临床病理特征脉管侵犯率比较
表2 319例结直肠癌患者脉管侵犯多因素分析
图1 脉管侵犯与无脉管侵犯结直肠癌患者的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线图
[1]
中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2017版)专家组.中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2017年版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(1):92-106.
[2]
Hamanaka R, Yokose T, Sakuma Y, et al. Prognostic impact of vascular invasion and standardization of its evaluation in stage I non-small cell lung cancer[J].Diagn Pathol,2015(10):17.
[3]
Hong SM, Goggins M, Christopher L, et al.Vascular invasion in infiltrating ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas can mimic pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia:a histopathologic study of 209 cases [J].Am J Surg Pathol,2012,36(2):235-241.
[4]
Kwiecien JM, Bassey-Archibong BI, Dabrowski W,et al.Loss of Kaiso expression in breast cancer cells prevents intra-vascular invasion in the lung and secondary metastasis[J].PLoS One,2017,12(9):e0183883.
[5]
Adel M, Kao HK, Hsu CL, et al. Evaluation of lymphatic and vascular invasion in relation to clinicopathological factors and treatment outcome in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2015,94(43):e1510.
[6]
夏启俊,陈凛.胃癌神经侵袭的细胞与分子机制[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2015,2(18):198-200.
[7]
Bu ZD, Zheng ZX, Li ZY,et al.Lymphatic vascular invasion in an independent correlated factor for lymph node metastasis and the prognosis of resectable T2 gastriccancer patients[J].Tumor Biol,2013,24(2):1005-1012.
[8]
Paduch R.The role of lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis in tumor metastasis[J].Cell Oncol (Dordr),2016,39(5):397-410.
[9]
韦之见,徐阿曼,韩文秀,等.早期胃癌患者脉管侵犯的危险因素分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,7(21):803-807.
[10]
尚琳,李博斐,贺奋飞,等.脉管侵犯对Ⅰ期胃癌根治术后患者预后的影响[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,2(21):175-179.
[11]
王银中,张艳萍,韩朝阳,等.早期胃癌淋巴结转移的影响因素分析[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2017,24(3): 328-332.
[12]
张波,令狐恩强,柴宁莉,等.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌中脉管癌栓相关因素分析[J].临床军医杂志,2018,46(1):34-36,40.
[13]
韩文秀,徐阿曼,陈章明,等.早期胃癌患者淋巴结转移危险因素分析及风险预测模型的建立[J].中华普通外科杂志,2017,32(4):285-288.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[3] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[6] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[7] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[8] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[9] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[10] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[11] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[12] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[13] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
阅读次数
全文


摘要