切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (04) : 258 -264. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2020.04.009

所属专题: 经典病例 经典病例 文献

临床研究

72例麦克尔憩室的术前诊断分析
陈颖1,(), 唐永华2, 陈双庆1, 胡春洪3   
  1. 1. 215002 南京医科大学附属苏州医院放射科
    2. 20003 上海交通大学附属瑞金医院放射科
    3. 215006 苏州大学附属第一医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-02 出版日期:2020-11-26
  • 通信作者: 陈颖

The preoperative diagnosis analysis of 72 cases with Meckel diverticulum

Ying Chen1,(), Yonghua Tang2, Shuangqing Chen1, Chunhong Hu3   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou 215002, China
    2. Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 20003, China
    3. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Shuzhou 215006, China
  • Received:2020-05-02 Published:2020-11-26
  • Corresponding author: Ying Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Ying, Email:
引用本文:

陈颖, 唐永华, 陈双庆, 胡春洪. 72例麦克尔憩室的术前诊断分析[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2020, 08(04): 258-264.

Ying Chen, Yonghua Tang, Shuangqing Chen, Chunhong Hu. The preoperative diagnosis analysis of 72 cases with Meckel diverticulum[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(04): 258-264.

目的

探讨不同影像学检查和内镜检查对麦克尔憩室的术前诊断价值和合理的诊断路径。

方法

回顾性分析2008年1月至2018年12月上海交通大学附属瑞金医院、南京医科大学附属苏州医院和苏州大学附属第一医院经手术或内镜证实的72例麦克尔憩室患者的影像学和内镜检查资料,按不同年龄(儿童组和成人组)和症状(出血组和腹痛组)分组比较不同检查方式的诊断率。

结果

各检查对麦克尔憩室的诊断率分别为:异位胃黏膜显像50.00%(3/6),数字减影血管造影12.50%(1/8), CT平扫7.14%(1/14),CT增强14.29%(1/7),CT小肠造影(CTE)57.45%(27/47),胶囊内镜(CE)16.00%(4/25),双气囊小肠镜(DBE)95.83%(46/48)。CTE对麦克尔憩室的诊断率高于其他CT检查方式(均P<0.05)。CTE对出血组的诊断率高于腹痛组(χ2=6.27,P<0.05),但儿童组和成人组的诊断率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.59,P>0.05)。DBE的诊断率高于CE和CTE(χ2=36.54,16.47;P<0.01),CTE的诊断率高于CE(χ2=8.13,P<0.01)。

结论

诊断率高的3种检查依次为DBE、CTE、CE,CTE诊断率高于其他CT检查方式,且对出血性憩室的诊断率高。宜根据不同的年龄段和症状选择合适的诊断路径。

Objective

To explore the value of different imageological and endoscopy examinations in preoperative diagnosis of Meckel diverticulum, and the reasonable diagnostic flowchart.

Methods

From January 2008 to December 2018, the data of imaging and endoscopic examinations of 72 patients with Meckel diverticulum confirmed by surgery or endoscopy who were collected from Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, and the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were retrospectively analyzed. The study was grouped according to different ages (children and adults) and symptoms (bleeding and abdominal pain), and the diagnostic rates of different examinations were compared.

Results

The diagnostic rates of radionuclide scintigraphy, digital subtraction angiography, non-enhanced CT, contrast enhanced CT, computed tomography enterography (CTE), capsule endoscopy (CE) and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) were 50.00%(3/6), 12.50%(1/8), 7.14%(1/14), 14.29%(1/7), 57.45%(27/47), 16.00%(4/25) and 95.83%(46/48), respectively. The diagnostic rate of CTE was higher than that of other CT methods (all P<0.05). The diagnostic rate of CTE in bleeding group was higher than that in abdominal pain group (χ2=6.27, P<0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference between child group and adult group (χ2=0.59, P>0.05). The diagnostic rate of DBE was higher than those of CE and CTE (χ2=36.54, 16.47, all P<0.01), and the diagnostic rate of CTE was higher than that of CE (χ2=8.13, P<0.01).

Conclusions

The three kinds of examinations with high diagnostic rate are DBE, CTE, CE successively. The diagnostic rate of CTE is higher than that of other CT methods, and it has a high diagnostic rate in hemorrhagic diverticulum. Reasonable diagnostic flowchart should be used according to different ages and symptoms.

图1 13岁麦克尔憩室伴消化道出血男性患者异位胃黏膜显像图像
图2 23岁麦克尔憩室伴消化道出血男性患者影像学及内镜检查图像
表1 各检查对不同年龄和不同症状的麦克尔憩室患者诊断情况比较
图3 13岁麦克尔憩室伴消化道出血男性患者双气囊小肠镜检查图像
表2 CTE、CE、DBE对麦克尔憩室的诊断率比较(例,%)
图4 疑似麦克尔憩室儿童患者诊断路径图
图5 疑似麦克尔憩室成人患者诊断路径图
[1]
Choi SY, Hong SS, Park HJ, et al. The many faces of Meckel′s diverticulum and its complications[J].J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol,2017,61(2): 225-231.
[2]
DeBartolo HM J, Van Heerden JA.Meckel's diverticulum[J].Pediatr Clin Advisor,2007,183(10): 356-357.
[3]
Suh M, Lee HY, Jung K,et al.Diagnostic accuracy of Meckel scan with initial hemoglobin level to detect symptomatic Meckel diverticulum[J].Eur J Pediatr Surg,2014,25(5): 449-453.
[4]
Mitchell AW, Spencer J, Allison DJ,et al.Meckel′s diverticulum: angiographic findings in 16 patients[J].AJR,1998,170(5): 1329-1333.
[5]
陆文明,沈艳,茹翱.胃肠超声在急危重症中的应用[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2018,6(2): 88-91.
[6]
张明智,庄华,罗燕.58例Meckel′s憩室病超声影像特点回顾性分析[J].生物医学工程学杂志,2014,31(4): 875-880.
[7]
许道文,袁建军.超声在儿童梅克尔憩室诊断中的作用及其与手术结果对比分析[J].现代医用影像学,2019,28(6): 1394-1395.
[8]
呼景好,霍亚玲,杨红,等.儿童梅克尔憩室的超声诊断及漏误诊分析[J].国际医药卫生导报,2020,26(2): 177-178.
[9]
Parra FC, Quiroga GS, Castro BS,et al.Computed tomography of complicated Meckel′s diverticulum in adults[J].Radiologia,2019,61(4): 297-305.
[10]
Huang CC, Lai MW, Hwang FM, et al. Diverse presentations in pediatric Meckel′s diverticulum: a review of 100 cases[J].Pediatr Neonatol,2014,55(5): 369-375.

URL    
[11]
Tseng CM, Lin IC, Chang CY,et al.Correction:role of computed tomography angiography on the management of overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding [J].Plos One,2018,13(2): e0193793.
[12]
Chen Y, Tang Y, Hu C, et al. Bleeding meckel diverticulum:a retrospective analysis of computed tomography enterography findings[J].J Comput Assist Tomogr,2019,43(2): 220-227.
[13]
Paulsen SR, Huprich JE, Fletcher JG,et al.CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases[J].Radiographics,2006,26(3): 641-662.
[14]
Heine GD, Hadithi M, Groenen M,et al.Double-balloon enteroscopy:Indications,diagnostic rate,and complications in a series of 275 patients with suspected small-bowel disease[J].Endoscopy,2006,38(1): 42-48.
[15]
He Q, Zhang YL, Xiao B,et al.Double-balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis of Meckel′s diverticulum: comparison with operative findings and capsule endoscopy [J].Surgery,2013,153(4): 549-554.
[16]
Krstic SN, Martinov JB, Sokic-Milutinovic AD, et al. Capsule endoscopy is useful diagnostic tool for diagnosing Meckel′s diverticulum[J].Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2016,28(6): 702-707.
[17]
Hansen CC, Søreide K.Systematic review of epidemiology,presentation,and management of Meckel′s diverticulum in the 21st century[J].Medicine,2018,97(35): e12154.
[18]
Fukushima M, Kawanami C, Inoue S,et al.A case series of Meckel′s diverticulum: usefulness of double-balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis[J].BMC Gastroenterol,2014(14): 155.
[19]
肖年军,宁守斌,金晓维,等.经肛气囊辅助小肠镜对成人梅克尔憩室术前诊断的价值[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2019,36(11): 852-854.
[20]
中华医学会消化内镜学分会小肠镜和胶囊内镜学组.中国小肠镜临床应用指南[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2018,23(5): 672-678.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 唐金侨, 叶宇佳, 王港, 赵彬, 马艳宁. 医学影像学检查方法在颞下颌关节紊乱病中临床应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 406-411.
[3] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[4] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[5] 熊鹰, 林敬莱, 白奇, 郭剑明, 王烁. 肾癌自动化病理诊断:AI离临床还有多远?[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 535-540.
[6] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[7] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[8] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[9] 王秋生. 胆道良性疾病诊疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 779-782.
[10] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
[11] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[12] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[13] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
[14] 胡云鹤, 周玉焯, 付瑞瑛, 于凡, 李爱东. CHS-DRG付费制度下GB1分组住院费用影响因素分析与管理策略探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 568-574.
[15] 朱旦华, 卢放根. 以腹水为主要特征的Castleman病16例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 462-473.
阅读次数
全文


摘要