切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01) : 53 -58. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2022.01.011

临床研究

洗涤回收式自体输血对膝关节、髋关节置换术患者血栓弹力图及免疫功能的影响
陈进凡1, 查成喜1, 郭星星1, 汪丽娟1, 杨建忠1, 陈瑗1, 兰炯采2,()   
  1. 1. 730050 兰州,甘肃省中医院输血科
    2. 510515 广州,南方医科大学南方医院
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-04 出版日期:2022-02-26
  • 通信作者: 兰炯采

The effect of washing autotransfusion salvage on thromboelastography and immune function in patients undergoing knee and hip arthroplasty surgery

Jinfan Chen1, Chengxi Zha1, Xingxing Guo1, Lijuan Wang1, Jianzhong Yang1, Yuan Chen1, Jiongcai Lan2,()   

  1. 1. Department of the Blood Transfusion, Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730050, China
    2. Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2021-01-04 Published:2022-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Jiongcai Lan
引用本文:

陈进凡, 查成喜, 郭星星, 汪丽娟, 杨建忠, 陈瑗, 兰炯采. 洗涤回收式自体输血对膝关节、髋关节置换术患者血栓弹力图及免疫功能的影响[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 53-58.

Jinfan Chen, Chengxi Zha, Xingxing Guo, Lijuan Wang, Jianzhong Yang, Yuan Chen, Jiongcai Lan. The effect of washing autotransfusion salvage on thromboelastography and immune function in patients undergoing knee and hip arthroplasty surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 10(01): 53-58.

目的

探讨洗涤回收式自体输血对膝关节、髋关节置换术患者血栓弹力图及免疫功能的影响。

方法

选取2019年1月至12月甘肃省中医院骨科收治的膝关节、髋关节置换术中出血400~1 000 ml,回收输血量400~600 ml的患者186例为观察组,并选择同期只接受异体输血的患者162例为对照组。对两组患者输血前与输血后1 d、5 d的血红蛋白(Hb)、红细胞计数(RBC)、红细胞比容(HCT)、血小板(PLT)、血栓弹力图[包括凝血反应时间(R)、最大振幅(MA)、血凝块形成时间(K)、凝固角度(α)]及细胞免疫功能(包括CD3+CD4+T细胞、CD3+CD8+T细胞、CD16+CD56+NK细胞)水平进行检测并比较。

结果

输血后1 d,观察组Hb(112.57±14.32)g/L、HCT(34.10±3.32)%、RBC(3.12±0.53)×1012/L、PLT(125±31)×109/L与对照组Hb(108.35±12.84)g/L、HCT(33.52±3.04)%、RBC(2.91±0.42)×1012/L、PLT(123±40)×109/L比较,均差异无统计学意义(t=0.36,1.21,1.37,1.94;均P>0.05);输血后5 d,观察组Hb(122.52±13.70)g/L、HCT(40.12±3.80)%、RBC(3.91±0.45)×1012/L、PLT(135±39)×109/L与对照组Hb(118.31±13.91)g/L、HCT(35.50±3.70)%、RBC(3.14±0.61)×1012/L、PLT(127±31)×109/L比较,均差异有统计学意义(t=7.01,5.58,5.72,7.61;均P<0.05)。输血后1 d,观察组R(5.97±0.31)min、MA(56.73±2.24)mm、K(2.57±0.10)min、α(59.88±1.73)°与对照组R(6.07±0.30)min、MA(57.68±1.78)mm、K(2.70±0.52)min、α(61.12±3.09)°比较,均差异无统计学意义(t=2.02,0.90,0.66,0.99;均P>0.05)。输血后5 d,观察组R(6.62±0.59)min、MA(63.81±0.86)mm、K(2.95±0.19)min、α(61.12±2.36)°与对照组R(6.82±1.21)min、MA(62.99±1.88)mm、K(2.82±0.18)min、α(60.50±2.07)°比较,均差异无统计学意义(t=1.70,1.04,1.33,0.56;均P>0.05)。流式细胞分析表明,输血后1 d,观察组患者CD3+CD4+T细胞的水平(33.66±2.10)高于对照组(29.88±1.97),差异有统计学意义(t=3.72,P<0.01);输血后5 d,观察组CD3+CD4+T细胞(35.92±0.79)、CD3+CD8+T细胞(21.82±1.61)、CD16+CD56+NK细胞(1.68±0.14)水平均高于对照组(29.83±2.11、20.53±2.71、1.03±0.13),均差异有统计学意义(t=7.66,6.57,9.58;均P<0.01)。

结论

与异体输血比较,洗涤回收式自体输血不影响膝关节置换、髋关节置换患者血栓弹力图R、MA、K、α,可以提高患者的细胞免疫功能。

Objective

To explore the effect of washing autotransfusion salvage on thromboelastography and immune function of patients undergoing knee and hip arthroplasty surgery.

Methods

A total of 186 patients with 400-1 000 ml bleeding and 400-600 ml of recovered blood transfusion during knee and hip arthroplasty surgery who were admitted to the Orthopedics Department of Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January to December 2019 were selected as the observation group, and at the same time 162 patients with allogeneic transfusion were selected as the control group. The postoperative hemoglobin (Hb), red blood cell count (RBC), hematocrit (HCT), thromboelastography, including reaction time (R), maximum amplitude (MA), blood clot formation time (K), α and cellular immune function (including CD3+ CD4+ T cells, CD3+ CD8+ T cells, CD16+ CD56+ NK cells) levels of the two groups of patients before and 1 d, 5 d after blood transfusion were tested and compared.

Results

One day after blood transfusion, Hb (112.57±14.32)g/L, HCT (34.10±3.32)%, RBC (3.12±0.53)×1012/L, PLT (125±31)×109/L of the observation group were compared with those of the control group [Hb (108.35±12.84)g/L, HCT (33.52±3.04)%, RBC (2.91±0.42)×1012/L, PLT (123±40)×109/L], the differences were not statistically significant (t=0.36, 1.21, 1.37, 1.94, all P>0.05). Five days after blood transfusion, Hb, HCT, RBC, PLT [(122.52±13.70)g/L, (40.12±3.80)%, (3.91±0.45)×1012/L, (135±39)×109/L] levels of the observation group were compared with those of the control group [Hb (118.31±13.91)g/L, HCT (35.50±3.70)%, RBC (3.14±0.61)×1012/L, PLT (127±31)×109/L], the differences were statistically significant (t=7.01, 5.58, 5.72, 7.61, all P<0.05). One day after blood transfusion, the R, MA, K, α [(5.97±0.31)min, (56.73±2.24)mm, (2.57±0.10)mm, (59.88±1.73)°] of the observation group were compared with those in the control group [R (6.07±0.30)min, MA (57.68±1.78)mm, K (2.70±0.52)min, α (61.12±3.09)°], showing no statistically significant differences (t=2.02, 0.90, 0.66, 0.99, all P>0.05). Five days after blood transfusion, the R, MA, K, α [(6.62±0.59)min, (63.81±0.86)mm, (2.95±0.19)min, (61.12±2.36)°] of the observation group were compared with those of the control group [R (6.82±1.21)min, MA (62.99±1.88)min, K (2.82±0.18)min, α (60.50±2.07)°], showing no statistically significant differences (t=1.70, 1.04, 1.33, 0.56, all P>0.05). Flow cytometry analysis showed that 1 day after blood transfusion, the level of CD3+ CD4+ T cells in the observation group (33.66±2.10) was significantly higher than that in the control group (29.88±1.97) , the difference was statistically significant (t=3.72, P<0.01). Five days after blood transfusion, the levels of CD3+ CD4+ T cells (35.92±0.79), CD3+ CD8+ T cells (21.82±1.61), and CD16+ CD56+ NK cells (1.68±0.14) of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group (29.83±2.11, 20.53±2.71, 1.03±0.13), the differences were statistically significant (t=7.66, 6.57, 9.58, all P<0.01).

Conclusion

Compared with allogeneic transfusion, washing autotransfusion salvage does not affect the R, MA, K, α of thromboelastography of patients undergoing knee and hip arthroplasty surgery, and could improve the patient′s cellular immune function.

表1 两种输血方法对膝关节、髋关节置换术患者血常规指标的影响(±s)
表2 两种输血方法对膝关节、髋关节置换术患者血栓弹力图的影响(±s)
表3 两种输血方法对膝关节、髋关节置换术患者免疫功能的影响(±s)
[1]
周俊,张艳春.自体输血的应用探索与创新[J].中国输血杂志201629(3): 231-234.DOI: 10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004-549x.2016.03.001.
[2]
熊美娟.回收式自体输血与同种异体输血在腰硬联合麻醉下腰椎骨折手术患者中的应用效果[J].医疗装备202033(19): 85-86.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2020.19.043.
[3]
曹甜甜,刘兴会,吕斌.回收式自体血在产科的应用现状及研究进展[J].实用妇产科杂志202036(11): 827-830.DOI: 1003-6946(2020)11-0827-04.
[4]
Paudyal P, Gurung G, Adhikari A, et al. Elderly gravida with bombay blood group and placenta previa managed with autologous blood transfusion[J]. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol20208850500.DOI: 10.1155/2020/8850500.
[5]
陈玮媛,杨春晨,戎瑞明.术中回收式自体输血在肿瘤患者中的应用进展[J].中国输血杂志201932(5): 506-509.DOI: 10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004-549x.2019.05.028.
[6]
邹志斌,罗庆勇,邹国荣,等.回收式自体血回输技术在颅脑外伤手术中的应用[J].当代医学202026(20): 95-97.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2020.20.038.
[7]
王菁,代小梅,芶大明.复方电解质注射液对术中回收红细胞回输后患者Hb及RBC的影响[J].中国输血杂志201932(11): 1120-1123.DOI: 10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004-549x.2019.11.008.
[8]
朱文献,王毅鑫,苏文利,等.洗涤回收式自体输血对腹部创伤患者细胞免疫的影响[J].中国现代普通外科进展201215(10): 800-804.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9905.2012.10.014.
[9]
孙文栋,徐诗雄,张国炳.洗涤回收式自体输血对老年多脏器联合伤患者细胞免疫的影响[J].中国老年学杂志201535(3): 637-639.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2015.03.029.
[10]
郑显良,姚中吉.回收式自体/异体输血对心脏手术患者的影响[J].中国输血杂志201932(8): 786-789.DOI: 10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004-549x.2019.08.017.
[11]
Heiss MM, Fraunberger P, Delanoff C,et al. Modulation of immune response by blood transfusion: evidence for a differential effect of allogeneic and autologous blood in colorectal cancer surgery[J]. Shock19978(6): 402-408.DOI: 10.1097/00024382-199712000-00002.
[12]
Long MY, Liu ZH, Zhu JG. Comparative analysis of autologous blood transfusion and allogeneic blood transfusion in surgical patients[J].Int J Clin Exp Med20147(9): 2889-2894.PMCID: PMC4211804.
[13]
徐文俊,王莒生.中药对T淋巴细胞免疫抑制作用的研究进展[J].世界中西医结合杂志201510(3): 440-444.DOI: 10.13935/j.cnki.sjzx.150345.
[14]
Kim AR, Sankaran VG.Development of autologous blood cell therapies[J]. Exp Hematol201644(10): 887-894.DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2016.06.005.
[15]
Bortolotti P, Faure E, Kipnis E.Inflammasomes in tissue damages and immune disorders after trauma[J].Front Immunol2018(9): 1900.DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01900.
[16]
刘永霞,雷水娟,张莉,等.急性等容稀释性自体输血与异体输血对剖宫产手术患者T细胞亚群、肝肾功能及炎性细胞因子水平的影响[J].现代生物医学进展202020(24): 4730-4734.DOI: 10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2020.24.029.
[17]
解绪红,严志强,杨芬莲,等.3种输血方式对高危产妇围术期免疫功能的影响[J].安徽医学202041(10): 1143-1146.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2020.10.008.
[18]
王洁,曾选.孕产妇稀有血型鉴定及临床输血方案探讨[J].实验与检验医学202038(6): 1209-1211.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1129.2020.06.050.
[1] 张艳兰, 徐琳, 王彩英, 庞琳. 淋巴细胞亚群在儿童重症甲型流感诊断中的价值[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 368-373.
[2] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 国家肾脏移植质控中心. 肾移植受者人类微小病毒B19感染临床诊疗技术规范(2022版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 193-200.
[3] 周梦婕, 梁馨月, 吉前成. TIM-1、TIM-3联合检测对活动性肺结核的诊断意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(06): 788-790.
[4] 吴素馨, 叶韵斌. TCR-T治疗中靶点选择的策略[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 250-256.
[5] 李杰, 任加强, 马坚, 王铮, 马清涌, 仵正. 血栓弹力图测定对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除术后出血的预测价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 211-215.
[6] 符梅沙, 周玉华, 李慧, 薛春颜. 淋巴细胞免疫治疗对复发性流产患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分布与PD1/PD-L1表达的影响及意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 726-730.
[7] 张涛, 万亚楠, 卢昕媛, 赵庆忠, 韩振, 宋威, 万健. TEG对脓毒症患者DIC诊断及预后的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(09): 881-886.
[8] 刘健, 韦晓旭, 李庆友, 黄明将. 血栓弹力图R值在重型颅脑损伤并发MODS中的作用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(07): 680-684.
[9] 吴远慧, 朱由瑾, 周向昭, 温杰, 高晓莉, 冯冬梅. 早期梅毒患者血清IL-1β、IL-27、IL-33水平与细胞免疫状况的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(09): 666-671.
[10] 张剑, 郭彦伟, 张自森, 王利娟, 张红巧. 胃癌患者外周血T细胞免疫球蛋白黏蛋白-3的表达及临床意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(08): 621-625.
[11] 吴梦滢, 赵茵. 子痫前期和凝血功能异常[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2021, 10(03): 147-150.
[12] 高雷, 李全, 巴雅力嘎, 陈强, 侯智慧, 曹胜军, 巴特. 重度烧伤患者血小板外泌体对凝血功能调节作用的初步研究[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 149-154.
[13] 陈志鹏, 张铁凝, 高雷, 曹胜军, 李全. 血栓弹力图在早期烧伤后凝血功能障碍诊断的应用研究[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 257-261.
[14] 张许平, 刘佳成, 张舸, 杜艳姣, 李韶, 商丹丹, 王浩, 李艳, 段智慧. CYP2C19基因多态性联合血栓弹力图指导大动脉粥样硬化型非致残性缺血性脑血管事件患者抗血小板治疗的效果[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 477-481.
[15] 黎力梦, 陶悦, 刘坚军, 李旭, 王晓俊, 汪涛, 陈斌, 范隆华. 血小板抑制不足与颈动脉支架植入术后不良事件的相关性研究[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 227-231.
阅读次数
全文


摘要