切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 171 -176. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2022.03.005

基因诊断

组织蛋白酶B基因启动子多态性与急性心肌梗死发病的关系
孔倩1, 白冠男2, 周瑜1, 闫波3,()   
  1. 1. 272013 济宁医学院临床医学院
    2. 250012 济南,山东大学齐鲁医学院
    3. 272029 济宁,山东省心脏疾病诊疗重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-09 出版日期:2022-08-26
  • 通信作者: 闫波
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81870279)

Correlation between CTSB gene promoter region polymorphism and clinical features in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Qian Kong1, Guannan Bai2, Yu Zhou1, Bo Yan3,()   

  1. 1. College of Clinical Medicine, Jining Medical University, Jining 272013, China
    2. Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
    3. Shandong Provincial Laboratory of Cardiac Disease Diagnosis and Treatment, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272029, China
  • Received:2022-04-09 Published:2022-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Bo Yan
引用本文:

孔倩, 白冠男, 周瑜, 闫波. 组织蛋白酶B基因启动子多态性与急性心肌梗死发病的关系[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 171-176.

Qian Kong, Guannan Bai, Yu Zhou, Bo Yan. Correlation between CTSB gene promoter region polymorphism and clinical features in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 10(03): 171-176.

目的

探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)与组织蛋白酶B(CTSB)基因启动区rs1293312 T/C位点单核苷酸多态性(SNP)之间的关系及其相关危险因素。

方法

采用病例-对照研究方法,选择2021年1月至12月于济宁医学院附属医院心内科住院的201例AMI患者(AMI组)和同期体检中心健康体检者204例(对照组);应用聚合酶链反应-限制性片段长度多态性(PCR-RELP)结合DNA测序后的序列比对进行数据统计;运用Hardy-Weinberg平衡检验后,应用χ2检验进行相关分析;利用多因素Logistic回归对多种危险因素以及该SNP位点与AMI发病进行关联性分析;利用SNPinfo数据库预测该SNP位点所影响的转录因子结合位点。

结果

两组rs1293312 T/C位点SNP位点分别检测出3种基因型为CC、TC和TT,其基因型分布均符合Hardy-Weinberg平衡(χ2=0.57,1.68;均P>0.05)。CC、TC、TT基因型在AMI组[34(16.92%)、91(45.27%)、76(37.81%)]和对照组[37(18.14%)、89(43.63%)、78(38.23%)]间,以及C、T等位基因在AMI组[159(39.55%)、243(60.45%)]和对照组[163(39.95%)、245(60.05%)]间比较,均差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.15,0.01;均P>0.05)。在5种不同遗传模式下进行Logistic回归分析发现,该SNP位点与AMI发病无关联性(均P>0.05)。

结论

CTSB基因启动区rs1293312 T/C与AMI发病无关,但提供了CTSB基因启动区多态性的群体遗传学资料。

Objective

To investigate the relationship between acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of cathepsin B(CTSB) gene promoter region rs1293312T/C site and the associated risk factors.

Methods

A case-control study was performed to collect 201 AMI patients (AMI group) hospitalized in the Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University from January 2021 to December 2021, and 204 healthy controls (control group) in the physical examination center. Following DNA sequencing data were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RELP) technique combined with sequence alignment. Following the Hardy-Weinberg balance test, the χ2 test was used for correlation analysis. Logistic regression was utilized to examine the relationship between various risk variables, SNP loci and the incidence of AMI.

Results

The SNP loci revealed three genotypes, including CC, CT and TT. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (χ2=0.57, 1.68, all P>0.05) and the genotype distribution were both supported by the data. There were no significant differences (χ2=0.15, 0.01, all P>0.05) between the CC, TC, TT genotypes of the AMI group [34(16.92%), 91(45.27%), 76(37.81%)] and the control group [37(18.14%), 89(43.63%), 78(38.23%)], as well as the C and T alleles of the AMI group [159(39.55%), 243(60.45%)] and control group [163(39.95%), 245(60.05%)]. Logistic regression analysis in five different genetic models suggested that the SNP loci was not associated with the onset of AMI (all P>0.05).

Conclusion

The population genetics of the CTSB gene promoter region polymorphism is provided by the CTSB gene promoter rs1293312 T/C SNP, which is not related to the onset of AMI.

图1 急性心肌梗死患者和体检人群CTSB基因测序结果峰图注:a图为正常序列TT型;b图为纯合子突变序列CC型;c图为杂合子突变序列TC型,SNP位点由T突变为C(箭头所示);CTSB为组织蛋白酶B
表1 rs1293312 T/C PCR引物序列表
表2 AMI组与体检人群临床资料的比较
表3 CTSB基因启动区SNP位点在AMI组和体检人群中基因型及等位基因频率分布(例,%)
表4 AMI相关危险因素的多因素Logistic回归分析
表5 CTSB基因启动区rs1293312 T/C与AMI发病的Logistic回归分析(例,%)
表6 受rs1293312 T/C影响的转录因子预测结合位点
[1]
国家心血管病中心.《中国心血管健康与疾病报告》2020[J].心肺血管病杂志202140(10):885-889.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5062.2021.09.001.
[2]
Montarello NJNguyen MTWong D,et al.Inflammation in coronary atherosclerosis and its therapeutic implications[J].Cardiovasc Drugs Ther202236(2):347-362.DOI:10.1007/s10557-020-07106-6.
[3]
Li Y, He XN, Li C, et al. Identification of candidate genes and microRNAs for acute myocardial Iinfarction by weighted gene coexpression network analysis[J].Biomed Res Int2019(2019):5742608.DOI:10.1155/2019/5742608.
[4]
Huang WHe YWang H,et al.Linkage disequilibrium sharing and haplotype-tagged SNP portability between populations[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2006103(5):1418-1421.DOI:10.1073/pnas.0510360103.
[5]
Thygesen KAlpert JSJaffe AS,et al.Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction(2018)[J].Circulation2018138(20):e618-e651.DOI:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617.
[6]
Wu HDu QDai Q,et al.Cysteine protease cathepsins in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases[J].J Atheroscler Thromb201825(2):111-123.DOI:10.5551/jat.RV17016.
[7]
Bohley PSeglen PO.Proteases and proteolysis in the lysosome[J].Experientia199248(2):151-157.DOI:10.1007/BF01923508.
[8]
Khera AV, Kathiresan S. Genetics of coronary artery disease:discovery,biology and clinical translation[J].Nat Rev Genet201718(6):331-344.DOI:10.1038/nrg.2016.160.
[9]
Hara MSakata YSato H.Genetic factors in myocardial infarction[J].Rinsho Byori201361(2):176-183.
[10]
中华医学会心血管病学分会精准心血管病学学组,中国医疗保健国际交流促进会精准心血管病分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.单基因遗传性心血管疾病基因诊断指南[J].中华心血管病杂志201947(3):175-196.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2019.03.003.
[11]
Dai JZhang QWan C,et al.Significances of viable synergistic autophagy-associated cathepsin B and cathepsin D (CTSB/CTSD) as potential biomarkers for sudden cardiac death[J].BMC Cardiovasc Disord202121(1):233.DOI:10.1186/s12872-021-02040-3.
[12]
Yang J, Chen T, Zhou Y. Mediators of SARS-CoV-2 entry are preferentially enriched in cardiomyocytes[J].Hereditas2021158(1):4.DOI:10.1186/s41065-020-00168-4.
[13]
纪汪溟.肿瘤坏死因子诱导的卵巢癌OV-90细胞凋亡机制研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2011.
[14]
Mosley JD, Gupta DK, Tan J, et al. Predictive accuracy of a polygenic risk score compared with a clinical risk score for incident coronary heart disease[J].JAMA2020323(7):627-635.DOI:10.1001/jama.2019.21782.
[15]
Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, et al. Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis:objectives and design[J].Am J Epidemiol2002156(9):871-881.DOI:10.1093/aje/kwf113.
[1] 王友芳, 李兴超, 刘清敏, 刘德彬, 刘松伍, 郭冬冬, 车峰远. 应激性高血糖指数对经皮冠状动脉介入术后急性心肌梗死患者发生主要不良心脑血管事件的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 124-129.
[2] 张禾璇, 杨雪, 王侣金, 李林洁, 刘兴宇. 新生儿葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶缺乏症筛查及基因突变特征分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 200-208.
[3] 王叶青, 李利彤, 李伟绪, 曹猛. 牙周炎和糖尿病视网膜病变的因果关系:一项双向两样本孟德尔随机化分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 160-168.
[4] 卢斌, 张天琪, 徐烨, 刘方奇. 中国人群经典型家族性腺瘤性息肉病的临床、病理和分子特征[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 38-44.
[5] 张智, 董志伟, 徐祖鑫, 姜莉鑫, 张玉辉, 顾国利. Peutz-Jeghers综合征基因型研究及临床诊治进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 6-13.
[6] 刘亮, 肖浩, 崔晓磊, 吕宝谱, 张睿, 郑拓康, 孟庆冰, 姚冬奇, 田英平, 高恒波. 急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者预后因素分析97例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 183-189.
[7] 林永俭, 谢雪花, 郝莉茹, 刘丽, 马英东. 优化急诊绿色通道对急性心肌梗死介入治疗患者救治时间的影响[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 185-189.
[8] 刘聪辉, 何浩然, 黄一诺, 张凤, 王凡月, 郝翰. 膳食铜补充对大鼠心肌梗死后心肌基质金属蛋白酶2表达水平及血流动力学的影响[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 166-172.
[9] 郭方明, 赵明俐, 颜凡辉, 刘萌萌, 王阳, 赵英杰, 刘远航, 张艳芬, 詹景冬. 光学相干断层成像在急性心肌梗死冠状动脉分层斑块病变中的应用[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 73-79.
[10] 姜晓宇, 付迪, 陈雪英, 申程, 甘立军. 胶原在心肌梗死后心脏重构中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 25-30.
[11] 徐来英, 程效, 戴亨纷, 侯俊凉, 苏怡林, 张彦. 药物联合个体化精准恒定功率运动疗法治疗心肌梗死术后频发室性早搏一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 176-179.
[12] 单兴华, 唐文栋, 赵仙先. 延伸导管在室间隔穿孔介入治疗的新应用一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 126-128.
[13] 田欢, 吴艳凯, 宋波, 魏榕辰, 张艳, 李月戈, 武柏林. 基于心脏磁共振多模态特征评估急性心肌梗死患者预后[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 17-25.
[14] 李佳佳, 李凌华, 吕诗韵, 冯凯, 刘琳珊, 钟海丹, 颜婵, 刘聪. 广州市病毒学抑制失败HIV/AIDS患者的耐药特征及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 207-212.
[15] 郑屹, 刘莹, 张煜坤, 李广平, 陈康寅, 刘彤. 既往及新发心房颤动对急性心肌梗死患者远期卒中风险的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 406-417.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?