切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 49 -55. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2023.01.010

临床研究

肌酐/胱抑素C对晚期上皮性卵巢癌术后并发症的预测价值
王可珺1, 李吉镇2, 马标3, 续慧超4, 谌红珊4, 刘雷5,()   
  1. 1. 272013 济宁医学院临床医学院
    2. 272500 济宁,汶上县人民医院心内科
    3. 272029 济宁医学院附属医院重症监护室
    4. 272029 济宁医学院附属医院临床营养科
    5. 272029 济宁医学院附属医院全科医学
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-23 出版日期:2023-02-26
  • 通信作者: 刘雷
  • 基金资助:
    济宁医学院附属医院博士科研基金(2020-BS-014)

Predictive value of creatinine/cystatin C on postoperative complications of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Kejun Wang1, Jizhen Li2, Biao Ma3, Huichao Xu4, Hongshan Shen4, Lei Liu5,()   

  1. 1. Colloge of Clinical Medicine, Jining Medical University, Jining 272013, China
    2. Department of Cardiology, Wenshang People′s Hospital, Jining 272500, China
    3. Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272029, China
    4. Department of Clinical Nutrition, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272029, China
    5. Department of General Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272029, China
  • Received:2022-10-23 Published:2023-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Lei Liu
引用本文:

王可珺, 李吉镇, 马标, 续慧超, 谌红珊, 刘雷. 肌酐/胱抑素C对晚期上皮性卵巢癌术后并发症的预测价值[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 49-55.

Kejun Wang, Jizhen Li, Biao Ma, Huichao Xu, Hongshan Shen, Lei Liu. Predictive value of creatinine/cystatin C on postoperative complications of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(01): 49-55.

目的

研究肌酐/胱抑素C(CCR)对晚期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)术后并发症的预测价值。

方法

对2017年1月1日至2020年10月30日于济宁医学院附属医院妇科行手术治疗的106例晚期EOC患者进行回顾性队列研究。单因素回归分析确定术后并发症的潜在危险因素。Logistic回归分析确定术后并发症的独立影响因素。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定CCR的最佳临界值。根据临界值将患者分为高CCR组及低CCR组,分析CCR与术后并发症的关系。

结果

76例(71.70%)患者发生术后并发症。调整相关混杂因素后,Logistic回归分析结果显示,术中出血量>300 ml(OR=8.53,95%CI 2.04~35.74)是术后并发症的独立危险因素(P<0.01);而CCR是术后并发症的独立保护因素,CCR每升高1个单位,术后并发症降低40.00%(OR=0.60,95%CI 0.37~0.97,P<0.05)。术前CCR的最佳截断值为8.165。低CCR组术后总体并发症的发生率(72/91,79.12%)明显高于高CCR组(4/15,26.67%)(χ2=14.46,P<0.01);低CCR组术后轻度并发症的发生率(62/91,68.13%)明显高于高CCR组(3/15,20.00%)(χ2=12.58,P<0.01)。

结论

术前CCR能有效预测晚期EOC患者术后并发症的发生。

Objective

To study the predictive value of creatinine/cystatin C (CCR) on complications following surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods

From January 1, 2017 to October 30, 2020, 106 patients with advanced EOC who received surgical care in the Gynecology Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University were the subject of a retrospective cohort research. In order to identify the potential risk factors for postoperative complications, univariate regression analysis was utilized. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent influencing factors of postoperative complications. The best cutoff value for the CCR was determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Patients were divided into high and low CCR groups according to the critical value to investigate the relationship between the CCR and postoperative complications.

Results

Postoperative complications occurred in 76 patients (71.70%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that intraoperative blood loss greater than 300 ml (OR=8.53, 95%CI 2.04-35.74) was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications after controlling for relevant confounding variables (P<0.01). CCR was an independent protective factor for postoperative complications. Postoperative complications were reduced by 40.00% for every unit rise in CCR (OR=0.60, 95%CI 0.37-0.97, P<0.05). The preoperative CCR′s optimum cutoff value was 8.165. The overall incidence of postoperative complications in the low CCR group (72/91, 79.12%) was significantly higher than that in the high CCR group (4/15, 26.67%)(χ2=14.46, P<0.01). The incidence of postoperative mild complications in the low CCR group (62/91, 68.13%) was significantly higher than that in the high CCR group (3/15, 20.00%)(χ2=12.58, P<0.01).

Conclusion

In patients with advanced EOC after surgery, the preoperative CCR can accurately predict postoperative problems.

表1 晚期EOC患者一般资料比较
项目 无术后并发症组(n=30) 有术后并发症组(n=76) 统计量 P
年龄(岁,±s) 54.23±7.67 56.62±9.90 t=-1.19 0.239
初潮年龄(岁,±s) 15.33±1.83 16.49±2.22 t=-2.53 0.011
BMI(kg/m2±s) 24.26±2.67 23.26±3.50 t=1.40 0.164
合并症(例,%)        
  糖尿病 1(3.33) 5(6.58) χ2=0.42 0.515
  高血压病 6(20.00) 16(21.05) χ2=2.56 0.278
  冠心病 1(3.33) 6(7.89) χ2=0.73 0.394
腹部手术史(例,%) 7(23.33) 25(32.89) χ2=4.04 0.133
白细胞计数[×109/L,M(P25P75)] 6.33(5.20, 6.86) 6.35(5.06, 7.64) Z=-0.33 0.744
红细胞计数(×1012/L,±s) 4.34±0.44 4.22±0.48 t=1.15 0.251
血红蛋白(g/L,±s) 123.67±13.23 123.37±14.02 t=0.10 0.920
血小板[×109/L,M(P25P75)] 280.00(234.50, 344.00) 286.50(210.00, 353.75) Z=-0.01 0.989
白蛋白(g/L,±s) 43.34±4.20 42.88±4.92 t=0.45 0.651
肌酐(μmol/L,±s) 51.58±7.42 51.86±12.10 t=-0.02 0.906
胱抑素C(mg/L,±s) 0.84±0.20 0.95±0.23 t=-2.17 0.032
CCR(±s) 7.21±1.60 6.38±1.36 t=2.71 0.008
CA125[U/ml,M(P25P75)] 328.55(73.00, 609.82) 328.05(108.74, 1 405.17) Z=-1.27 0.203
CA199[U/ml,M(P25P75)] 9.76(5.74, 15.80) 10.24(4.35,15.81) Z=-0.14 0.989
纤维蛋白原(g/L,±s) 3.25±0.97 3.66±0.89 t=-2.09 0.004
手术时间[min,M(P25P75)] 213.00(171.25, 250.00) 230.50(197.75, 280.00) Z=-1.40 0.163
术中出血量[ml,M(P25P75)] 200.00(100.00, 300.00) 300.00(187.50, 800.00) Z=-2.83 0.004
术中输血(例,%)     χ2=13.13 <0.001
  28(93.33) 43(56.58)    
  2(6.67) 33(43.42)    
手术类型(例,%)     χ2=0.17 0.678
  PDS 21 (70.00) 50 (65.79)    
  NACT-IDS 9 (30.00) 26 (34.21)    
术中行上腹部手术(例,%) 3(10.00) 8(10.53) χ2=0.01 0.936
术中行肠道手术(例,%) 18(60.00) 45(59.21) χ2=0.01 0.941
术中行淋巴结切除(例,%)     χ2=0.10 0.952
  12(40.00) 31(40.79)    
  清扫 15(50.00) 36(47.37)    
  局部 3(10.00) 9(11.84)    
术中输血(例,%) 2(6.67) 33(43.42) χ2=13.13 <0.001
残留量(例,%)     χ2=0.40 0.817
  R0 15 (50.00) 40 (52.63)    
  R1 12 (40.00) 26 (34.21)    
  R2 3 (10.00) 10 (13.16)    
FIGO分期(例,%)     χ2=3.97 0.265
  ⅢA 1 (3.33) 2 (2.63)    
  ⅢB 10 (33.33) 14 (18.42)    
  ⅢC 18 (60.00) 51 (67.11)    
  1 (3.33) 9 (11.84)    
组织学分类(例,%)     χ2=1.77 0.779
  浆液性癌 27(90.00) 70(92.11)    
  黏液性癌 1(3.33) 1(1.32)    
  子宫内膜样癌 0 2(2.63)    
  透明细胞癌 1(3.33) 2(2.63)    
  未分类腺癌 1(3.33) 1(1.32)    
表2 晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者术后并发症的单因素分析
变量 OR(95%CI) P 变量 OR(95%CI) P
年龄 1.03(0.98,1.08) 0.237 是否行上腹部手术   0.936
初潮年龄 1.30(1.05,1.60) 0.016   1.00  
体重指数 0.91(0.80,1.04) 0.165   1.06(0.26,4.29)  
合并症     是否行肠道手术   0.941
  糖尿病 2.04(0.23,18.25) 0.523   1.00  
  高血压病 1.07(0.37,3.05) 0.902   0.97(0.41,2.29)  
  冠心病 2.49(0.29,21.57) 0.409 术中行淋巴结切除    
腹部手术史 1.61(0.61,4.26) 0.342   1.00  
白细胞计数 0.99(0.95,1.03) 0.567   清扫 0.93(0.38,2.28) 0.872
红细胞计数 0.58(0.23,1.47) 0.251   局部 1.16(0.27,5.03) 0.842
血红蛋白 1.02(0.97,1.05) 0.919 残留量    
血小板 1.04(0.97,1.08) 0.769   R0 1.00  
白蛋白 0.98(0.89,1.07) 0.648   R1 0.81(0.33,2.01) 0.653
肌酐/胱抑素C 0.68(0.50,0.91) 0.011   R2 1.25(0.30,5.17) 0.758
糖类抗原125 1.60(1.20,2.01) 0.087 国际妇产科联盟分期    
糖类抗原199 1.20(1.13,1.31) 0.861   ⅢA 1.00  
纤维蛋白原 1.79(1.02,3.16) 0.044   ⅢB 0.70(0.06,8.82) 0.783
手术时间 1.03(0.81,1.12) 0.520   ⅢC 1.42(0.12,16.58) 0.781
术中出血量 14.66(2.21,97.05) 0.005   4.50(0.19,106.82) 0.352
术中输血   0.002 组织学分类    
  1.00     浆液性癌 1.00  
  10.74(2.39,48.37)     黏液性癌 0.39(0.02,6.39) 0.506
手术类型   0.678   子宫内膜样癌 0.39(0.02,6.39) 0.506
  PDS 1.00     透明细胞癌 0.77(0.07,8.86) 0.835
  NACT-IDS 1.21(0.49,3.02)     未分类腺癌 0.39(0.02,6.39) 0.506
表3 晚期EOC患者术后并发症的多因素Logistic回归分析
图1 晚期EOC患者术前CCR的ROC曲线注:EOC为上皮性卵巢癌;CCR为肌酐/胱抑素C
表4 低CCR组与高CCR组患者术后并发症发生率比较(例,%)
[1]
Torre LA, Trabert B, DeSantis CE,et al.Ovarian cancer statistics,2018[J].CA Cancer J Clin201868(4):284-296.DOI:10.3322/caac.21456.
[2]
Lheureux S, Gourley C, Vergote I,et al.Epithelial ovarian cancer[J].Lancet2019393(10177):1240-1253.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32552-2.
[3]
Reid BM, Permuth JB, Sellers TA.Epidemiology of ovarian cancer:a review[J].Cancer Biol Med201714(1):9-32.DOI:10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0084.
[4]
Inci MG, Rasch J, Woopen H,et al.ECOG and BMI as preoperative risk factors for severe postoperative complications in ovarian cancer patients:results of a prospective study (RISC-GYN-trial)[J].Arch Gynecol Obstet2021304(5):1323-1333.DOI:10.1007/s00404-021-06116-5.
[5]
Rutten IJ, Ubachs J, Kruitwagen RF, et al. The influence of sarcopenia on survival and surgical complications in ovarian cancer patients undergoing primary debulking surgery[J].Eur J Surg Oncol201743(4):717-724.DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2016.12.016.
[6]
Silva de Paula N, de Aguiar Bruno K, Azevedo Aredes M,et al.Sarcopenia and skeletal muscle quality as predictors of postoperative complication and early mortality in gynecologic cancer[J].Int J Gynecol Cancer201828(2):412-420.DOI:10.1097/IGC.0000000000001157.
[7]
van der Zanden V, van Soolingen NJ, Viddeleer AR, et al. Low preoperative skeletal muscle density is predictive for negative postoperative outcomes in older women with ovarian cancer[J].Gynecol Oncol2021162(2):360-367.DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.039.
[8]
Hirai K, Tanaka A, Homma T,et al.Serum creatinine/cystatin C ratio as a surrogate marker for sarcopenia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J].Clin Nutr202140(3):1274-1280.DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2020.08.010.
[9]
Osaka T, Hamaguchi M, Hashimoto Y,et al.Decreased the creatinine to cystatin C ratio is a surrogate marker of sarcopenia in patients with type 2 diabetes[J].Diabetes Res Clin Pract2018(139):52-58.DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.025.
[10]
Ulmann G, Kaï J, Durand JP,et al.Creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio and bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of low lean body mass in cancer patients:comparison to L3-computed tomography scan[J].Nutrition2021(81):110895.DOI:10.1016/j.nut.2020.110895.
[11]
Lin YL, Chen SY, Lai YH,et al.Serum creatinine to cystatin C ratio predicts skeletal muscle mass and strength in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease[J].Clin Nutr202039(8):2435-2441.DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2019.10.027.
[12]
Gao J, Liang H, Qian Y,et al.Creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio as a marker of skeletal muscle mass for predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery[J].Ann Palliat Med202110(5):5017-5026.DOI:10.21037/apm-20-2366.
[13]
中国抗癌协会妇科肿瘤专业委员会.卵巢恶性肿瘤诊断与治疗指南(2021年版) [J].中国癌症杂志202131(6):490-500.DOI:10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2021.06.07.
[14]
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications:a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6 336 patients and results of a survey[J].Ann Surg2004240(2):205-213.DOI:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
[15]
Bjerregaard LG, Pedersen DC, Mortensen EL,et al.Breastfeeding duration in infancy and adult risks of type 2 diabetes in a high-income country[J].Matern Child Nutr201915(4):e12869.DOI:10.1111/mcn.12869.
[16]
Abrahamson M, Olafsson I, Palsdottir A, et al. Structure and expression of the human cystatin C gene[J].Biochem J1990268(2):287-294.DOI:10.1042/bj2680287.
[17]
Viollet L, Gailey S, Thornton DJ,et al.Utility of cystatin C to monitor renal function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy[J].Muscle Nerve200940(3):438-442.DOI:10.1002/mus.21420.
[18]
Beaudart C, McCloskey E, Bruyère O,et al.Sarcopenia in daily practice:assessment and management[J].BMC Geriatr201616(1):170.DOI:10.1186/s12877-016-0349-4.
[19]
Tang TJ, Xie L, Hu S,et al.Serum creatinine and cystatin C-based diagnostic indices for sarcopenia in advanced non-small cell lung cancer [J].J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle202213(3):1800-1810.DOI:10.1002/jcsm.12977.
[20]
Yang M, Shen Y, Tan L,et al.Prognostic value of sarcopenia in lung cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Chest2019156(1):101-111.DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2019.04.115.
[21]
Chakedis J, Spolverato G, Beal EW,et al.Pre-operative sarcopenia identifies patients at risk for poor survival after resection of biliary tract cancers[J].J Gastrointest Surg201822(10):1697-1708.DOI:10.1007/s11605-018-3802-1.
[22]
Gruber ES, Jomrich G, Tamandl D,et al.Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity are independent adverse prognostic factors in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma[J].PLoS One201914(5):e0215915.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0215915.
[23]
Silva de Paula N, de Aguiar Bruno K, Azevedo Aredes M,et al.Sarcopenia and skeletal muscle quality as predictors of postoperative complication and early mortality in gynecologic cancer[J].Int J Gynecol Cancer201828(2):412-420.DOI:10.1097/IGC.0000000000001157.
[24]
Kim HJ, Kim HB, Kim HY,et al.Associations of creatinine/cystatin C ratio and postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery:a retrospective study[J].Sci Rep202111(1):16881.DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-96442-0.
[25]
Castro B, Dos Reis R, Cintra GF,et al.Predictive factors for surgical morbidities and adjuvant chemotherapy delay for advanced ovarian cancer patients treated by primary debulking surgery or interval debulking surgery[J].Int J Gynecol Cancer201828(8):1520-1528.DOI:10.1097/IGC.0000000000001325.
[26]
Smits A, Lopes A, Das N, et al. Surgical morbidity and clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer-the role of obesity[J].BJOG2016123(2):300-308.DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.13585.
[27]
Xu Z, Becerra AZ, Justiniano CF,et al.Complications and survivorship trends after primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer[J].J Surg Res2020(246):34-41.DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2019.08.027.
[28]
Bacalbasa N, Balescu I, Dimitriu M, et al. The influence of the preoperative status on the risk of postoperative complications after cytoreductive surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer[J].In Vivo202034(2):839-844.DOI:10.21873/invivo.11846.
[1] 李圣鹏, 方爱蓝, 刘诗宁, 王丹, 刘湘奇. 下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度的预测因素与评估方法[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 441-445.
[2] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[3] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[4] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[5] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[6] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[7] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[8] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[9] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[10] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[11] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[12] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
[13] 秦维, 王丹, 孙玉, 霍玉玲, 祝素平, 郑艳丽, 薛瑞. 血清层粘连蛋白、Ⅳ型胶原蛋白对代偿期肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张出血的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 447-451.
[14] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[15] 王亚丹, 吴静, 黄博洋, 王苗苗, 郭春梅, 宿慧, 王沧海, 王静, 丁鹏鹏, 刘红. 白光内镜下结直肠肿瘤性质预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 655-661.
阅读次数
全文


摘要