切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 97 -102. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2025.02.005

影像学诊断研究

肝脏乏脂肪型血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤的影像学特征
张双1, 樊清语2, 田雅乐2, 柏福运3, 贾岩龙1,()   
  1. 1. 441021 湖北文理学院附属襄阳市中心医院放射影像科
    2. 430065 武汉科技大学医学部医学院
    3. 441000 湖北医药学院附属医院 襄阳市第一人民医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-28 出版日期:2025-05-26
  • 通信作者: 贾岩龙
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省自然科学基金襄阳创新发展联合基金项目(2025AFD099)湖北省自然科学基金(2022CFB960)襄阳市医疗卫生领域科技计划项目(2022YL15A)2023年襄阳市中心医院院级立项项目(2023YB07)

Imaging characteristics of hepatic lipid-poor perivascular epithelioid cell tumors

Shuang Zhang1, Qingyu Fan2, Yale Tian2, Fuyun Bai3, Yanlong Jia1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang 441021, China
    2. School of Medicine, Medical Faculty, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, China
    3. Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang First People′s Hospital, Xiangyang 441000, China
  • Received:2025-04-28 Published:2025-05-26
  • Corresponding author: Yanlong Jia
引用本文:

张双, 樊清语, 田雅乐, 柏福运, 贾岩龙. 肝脏乏脂肪型血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤的影像学特征[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2025, 13(02): 97-102.

Shuang Zhang, Qingyu Fan, Yale Tian, Fuyun Bai, Yanlong Jia. Imaging characteristics of hepatic lipid-poor perivascular epithelioid cell tumors[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2025, 13(02): 97-102.

目的

探讨肝脏乏脂肪型血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤(PEComa)的影像学特征。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2024年12月襄阳市中心医院肝胆外科经手术病理确诊的12例肝脏乏脂肪型PEComa患者的临床、病理及影像学资料,并复习相关文献。

结果

12例肝脏乏脂肪型PEComa患者均为女性,年龄(48.58±10.96)岁,肿瘤均为单发,其中4例位于肝左叶,8例位于肝右叶。临床表现为腹胀不适(2例)、腹痛(1例)及背痛(1例),8例无症状。影像学上,所有病例在动态增强扫描动脉期均呈现出显著强化,其中10例在门静脉期及延迟期强化程度逐渐减弱,符合典型“快进快出”或“快进慢出”强化模式;另外2例表现为在门静脉期及延迟期持续强化,即“持续性”强化模式。9例PEComa患者在增强扫描动脉期病灶内或周边可见增粗的血管影。病理上,肿瘤组织内缺乏成熟脂肪细胞,主要由大量上皮样细胞构成,并沿血管腔周围呈放射状排列;免疫组织化学染色显示HMB-45、Melan-A及平滑肌肌动蛋白均呈阳性表达。

结论

肝脏乏脂肪型PEComa在影像学及病理学上展现出独特的特征性表现,这些特征对于该病的早期诊断、鉴别诊断具有重要的临床价值。

Objective

To investigate the imaging characteristics of hepatic lipid-poor perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical, pathological and imaging data of 12 patients with hepatic lipid-poor PEComa diagnosed by surgical pathology in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery at Xiangyang Central Hospital from January 2016 to December 2024,and the relevant literatures were reviewed.

Results

All 12 patients with hepatic lipid-poor PEComa were female, with a mean age of (48.58±10.96) years old. The tumors were all solitary, among which 4 cases were located in the left lobe of the liver, and 8 cases were located in the right lobe. The clinical manifestations included abdominal distension and discomfort (2 cases), abdominal pain (1 case) and back pain (1 case), and while 8 cases were asymptomatic. In terms of imaging, all cases showed significant enhancement during the arterial phase of enhanced scan. Among them, the enhancement degrees of 10 cases gradually diminished in the portal vein phase and delayed phase, which was in line with the typical "fast-in and fast-out" or "fast-in and slow-out" enhancement patterns. The remaining 2 cases showed persistent enhancement during the portal vein stage and the delayed stage, and were classified as the "persistent"enhancement pattern. In the arterial phase of enhanced scanning, thickened vascular shadows could be seen in or around the lesions in 9 patients with PEComa. Pathologically, the tumor tissue lacked mature adipocytes and was mainly composed of a large number of epithelioid cells, which were radially arranged around the vascular lumen. Immunohistochemical staining showed positive expressions of HMB-45, Melan-A and smooth muscle actin.

Conclusion

Hepatic lipid-poor PEComas exhibit unique imaging and pathological characteristics, which are of significant clinical value for the early diagnosis and differential diagnosis of this disease.

表1 12例女性肝脏乏脂肪型PEComa患者临床及影像资料
图1 肝脏恶性PEComa患者(病例12)的CT影像学特征及病理学检查图像 注:图a~d为轴位CT扫描,显示病灶密度不均,内见囊变及液化性坏死;动态增强扫描示动脉期病灶呈明显不均匀强化,门静脉期持续强化,延迟期强化程度较前稍减低,呈现典型“快进慢出”强化方式;图e~h为矢状位多平面重建,显示肿瘤边缘及中心区域存在粗大的供血动脉(短黑箭头);图i显示瘤内有厚壁血管、上皮样或梭形平滑肌样细胞,未见明显脂肪成分,厚壁血管伴管壁玻璃样变性(HE ×10);图j显示瘤细胞呈圆形或多角形,核仁小,胞质透明、嗜伊红色,细胞异型性明显,见多量核分裂(HE ×40)(箭头所示);图k为免疫组织化学检查显示HMB-45阳性。PEComa为血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤
图2 肝脏乏脂肪型PEComa患者(病例4)的MRI影像学特征及病理学检查图像 注:图a~b分别为T1WI同相位、反相位,病灶信号均匀,反相位图像未见信号衰减,提示病灶内不含有脂肪成分,符合乏脂肪型病变特征;图c~d为T2WI压脂序列病灶呈均匀中高信号,提示肿瘤细胞密集且含水量较高,与良性肿瘤的影像学特征相符;图e~h为增强扫描显示动脉期病灶明显强化,边缘可见增粗强化血管影,提示肿瘤血供丰富(短黑箭头);门静脉期及延迟期强化程度略减低,呈现“快进慢出”的强化模式,提示肿瘤内血窦结构丰富;肝胆期低信号,提示肿瘤细胞缺乏正常肝细胞功能,无法摄取肝胆特异性对比剂;图i~j为DWI示扩散受限,提示肿瘤细胞密集;图k~l为病理学检查图像,镜下观察到肿瘤由大量上皮样细胞组成,细胞排列呈巢状或片状,胞质丰富,呈透明或嗜酸性,细胞核呈圆形或卵圆形。PEComa为血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤;T1WI为T1加权成像;T2WI为T2加权成像;DWI为弥散加权成像
图3 肝脏PEComa患者(病例2)的CT/MRI影像学特征与病理学检查图像 注:图a~d为CT平扫、动脉期、门静脉期及延迟期,病灶呈“快进慢出”强化方式,符合富血供肿瘤的特征;图e~h分别为T1WI同相位、反相位、T2WI压脂序列、DWI序列,病灶信号欠信号,反相位图像未见信号衰减,提示病灶内不含有脂肪成分;图i~k为MRI扫描动脉期、门静脉期及肝胆期,病灶呈“快进慢出”强化方式;图l为病理组学表现,镜下观察显示肿瘤细胞胞质丰富,呈透明或嗜酸性。PEComa为血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤;T1WI为T1加权成像;T2WI为T2加权成像;DWI为弥散加权成像
[1]
许阡,叶红,钟萍萍,等.子宫颈富含黑色素的血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤1例[J].中华妇产科杂志,2024,59(11):883-886.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20240625-00357.
[2]
赵苏苏,余慧萍,徐佳佳,等.肝脏血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤的临床病理观察[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2023,28(3):258-262.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0460.2023.03.010.
[3]
Li YF,Wang L,Xie YJ.Hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor:a case report[J].World J Clin Cases,2022,10(13):4273-4279.DOI:10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4273.
[4]
Tsui WM,Colombari R,Portmann BC,et al.Hepatic angiomyolipoma:a clinicopathologic study of 30 cases and delineation of unusual morphologic variants[J].Am J Surg Pathol,1999,23(1):34-48.DOI:10.1097/00000478-199901000-00004.
[5]
Kvietkauskas M,Samuolyte A,Rackauskas R,et al.Primary liver perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa):case report and literature review[J].Medicina (Kaunas),2024,60(3):409.DOI:10.3390/medicina60030409.
[6]
Gupta R,Hariprasad R,Dhanasekaran K,et al.Malignant perivascular epithelioid tumor of the vagina:report of a rare case with brief review of literature[J].Diagn Cytopathol,2020,48(5):483-488.DOI:10.1002/dc.24402.
[7]
Amante MF.Hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumors:benign,malignant,and uncertain malignant potential[J].World J Gastroenterol,2024,30(18):2374-2378.DOI:10.3748/wjg.v30.i18.2374.
[8]
Yang X,Wang Q,Zhou X,et al.Retrospective analysis of hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumour (PEComa) in a single centre for clinical diagnosis and treatment clinical diagnosis and treatment of hepatic PEComa[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2022,101(25):e29506.DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000029506.
[9]
余传林,冯湘,陈瑶,等.肝脏血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤影像及临床特征[J].放射学实践,2023,38(3):295-299.DOI:10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2023.03.010.
[10]
Zhu D,Song S,Wang D,et al.Hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor resembling hepatic adenoma and hepatocellular carcinoma on preoperative imaging:a case report[J].Front Oncol,2024(14):1292313.DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1292313.
[11]
曹丽娟,宋涛,姚英民,等.肝脏血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤临床诊治分析[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2022,28(10):721-725.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn113884-20220328-00135.
[12]
Utpatel K,Calvisi DF,Köhler G,et al.Complexity of PEComas:diagnostic approach,molecular background,clinical management[J].Pathologe,2020,41(Suppl 1):9-19.DOI:10.1007/s00292-019-0612-5.
[13]
Yan S,Lu JJ,Chen L,et al.Hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumors:the importance of preoperative diagnosis[J].World J Gastroenterol,2024,30(13):1926-1933.DOI:10.3748/wjg.v30.i13.1926.
[14]
Ji M,Zhang Y,Liu S,et al.Hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor:a retrospective analysis of 36 cases[J].Front Oncol,2024,14:1416254.DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1416254.
[15]
黄锋,谢安,刘建滨,等.不同类型肝脏血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤的影像特点[J].分子影像学杂志,2022,45(1):40-43.DOI:10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2022.01.08.
[16]
石建功,赵蕾,张玥熠,等.肝脏血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤的影像学表现[J].医学影像学杂志,2023,33(7):1203-1206.
[17]
何璐,覃玲艳,周梦琦,等.肝脏血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤的多模态影像学表现与病理对照分析[J].临床放射学杂志,2021,40(5):913-917.
[18]
Harwal R,Joseph Rosemary LJ,Raju P,et al.Hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma[J].ACG Case Rep J,2023,10(1):e00962.DOI:10.14309/crj.0000000000000962.
[1] 阚光娟, 孙立群, 王敏言, 李俨育, 谭艳娟, 仇玉轩, 潘淑淑, 朱江. 宫颈胃型腺癌的多模态影像学表现[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1030-1041.
[2] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[3] 吴润池, 李娟娟. 乳腺颗粒细胞瘤1 例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 61-62.
[4] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[5] 贺雪佳, 刘静, 张毓瑾, 贾凤林, 马鑫茂, 张慧, 宁刚, 曲海波, 廖怡. 胎儿生发基质-脑室内出血的影像学研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(01): 21-28.
[6] 刘振清, 黄莉, 王帅, 谢晨欣, 刘鸿圣. 胎盘MRI评分联合临床特征对胎盘植入性疾病孕妇产后出血的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(01): 37-43.
[7] 牛田力, 牛春艳, 赵鹏飞, 李世俊. 动脉自旋标记技术对儿童毛细胞型星形细胞瘤与血管母细胞瘤及髓母细胞瘤脑血流量检测的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(01): 61-66.
[8] 王浩, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 李义亮, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 不同检查方法对巨大食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的诊断价值及各检查指标间的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 494-500.
[9] 刘明辉, 葛方明. MRI 对腹股沟疝修补术后患者早期并发症的评估价值研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 579-583.
[10] 许裕杰, 华学锋, 李宁, 陆敏强. 机器人辅助与腹腔镜肝切除治疗肝脏肿瘤的围手术期疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(02): 98-104.
[11] 曹聪, 董伟, 徐良斌, 付雍. 成人肝母细胞瘤长期存活一例[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 471-474.
[12] 时吉庆, 李坤, 陈一峰. 罕见巨大胆总管囊肿术后九年新发肝脏肿瘤一例[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 126-127.
[13] 雷永琪, 刘新阳, 杨黎渝, 铁学宏, 俞星新, 耿志达, 刘雨, 陈政良, 惠鹏, 梁英健. 肝脏血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤合并贫血一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 710-718.
[14] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
[15] 金安松, 邹玉松, 刘玖涛, 薛凤麟, 庞爱兰. 孤立性颅内浆细胞瘤一例及相关文献复习[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 495-500.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?