Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04): 233-238. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2019.04.004

Special Issue:

• Clinical Researchs of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseases • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Establishment and validation of diagnosis model for acute myocardial infarction based on random forest classification in men

Yongnan Lyu1, Di Li2, Yan Li2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiology, People′s Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
    2. Department of Laboratory Medicine Centre, People′s Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
  • Received:2019-05-24 Online:2019-11-26 Published:2019-11-26
  • Contact: Yan Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Yan, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To establish and validate the model of forecasting acute myocardial infarction in men.

Methods

From January to June 2016, 205 male patients admitted to the department of cardiology of the People′s Hospital of Wuhan University with angina pectoris or acute myocardial infarction were included in our study. Among them, 151 patients served as training set and 54 patients served as validation set. Random forest was used to rank the importance of predicting acute myocardial infarction. According to the OOB error, AIC and BIC criterion, the sorting indexs were screened and the prediction model was constructed. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) was used to observe the ability of the model to differentiate acute myocardial infarction from angina pectoris, and validation set data was used to investigate whether the random forest could distinguish between acute myocardial infarction and angina pectoris.

Results

The 19 indicators were ranked according to mean Decrease Accuracy and mean Decrease Gini index. C-reactive protein, neutrophil absolute value and blood sugar inclusion model were screened by OOB error, AIC criterion and BIC criterion. In external validation, 26 of 31(83.87%) patients with acute myocardial infarction were correctly identified, and 19 of 23(82.61%) patients with angina pectoris were correctly identified.

Conclusion

Random forest-based predictive model can well distinguish between acute myocardial infarction and angina pectoris.

Key words: Acute myocardial infarction, Random forest, Machine learning

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0537-3616261 E-mail: zhzdxzz@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd