Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02): 73-76. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2023.02.001

• Special Writing •     Next Articles

Current situation and reflection of nuclide labeled glomerular filtration rate method

Xu Cheng1, Yue Yu2, Xiaohua Pei2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Nuclear, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nangjing 210029, China
    2. Department of Geriatric Nephrology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nangjing 210029, China
  • Received:2022-10-18 Online:2023-05-04 Published:2023-05-05
  • Contact: Xiaohua Pei

Abstract:

Although serum creatinine and/or serum cystatin C have been widely used in clinical practice to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR), they cannot replace nuclide labeled GFR measurement when measuring independent renal function and reflecting the true level of GFR. Nuclide labeled GFR methods include nuclide renal dynamic imaging method and nuclide plasma clearance method. These two methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, thus, we expect to objectively and comprehensively introduce their characteristics for rational use by clinicians.

Key words: Glomerular filtration rate, Nuclide, Renal function, Creatinine, Cystatin C

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0537-3616261 E-mail: zhzdxzz@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd