切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (03) : 187 -190. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2014.03.005

所属专题: 文献

胸腔积液诊疗专题

结核杆菌γ-干扰素体外释放试验对结核性胸腔积液的诊断价值
姜鲁宁1,(), 刘雪青1   
  1. 1. 272029 济宁医学院附属医院呼吸科
  • 收稿日期:2014-09-14 出版日期:2014-08-26
  • 通信作者: 姜鲁宁
  • 基金资助:
    济宁市科技局项目(2013jnwk54)

The clinical value of IFN-γ release assays on the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion

Luning Jiang1,(), Xueqing Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272100, China
  • Received:2014-09-14 Published:2014-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Luning Jiang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Luning Jiang, Email:
引用本文:

姜鲁宁, 刘雪青. 结核杆菌γ-干扰素体外释放试验对结核性胸腔积液的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2014, 02(03): 187-190.

Luning Jiang, Xueqing Liu. The clinical value of IFN-γ release assays on the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2014, 02(03): 187-190.

目的

探讨体外释放酶联免疫法检测结核杆菌γ-干扰素(TB-IGRA)对结核性胸腔积液的诊断价值。

方法

收集济宁医学院附属医院呼吸科2014年1~9月诊治的55例结核性和49例恶性胸腔积液患者的病例资料,对患者进行TB-IGRA、细菌涂片镜检、结核菌素皮试(PPD)和结核杆菌抗体等检测,并对以上诊断方法进行比较分析。同时联合检测血清癌胚抗原(CEA)及胸腔积液腺苷脱氨酶(ADA),以评估TB-IGRA联合CEA和ADA对鉴别诊断结核性胸腔积液的意义。采用SPSS 17.0统计软件进行数据分析,阳性例数以率表示,并进行卡方检验。CEA和ADA的测定值用均数±标准差表示,显著性检验用t检验。

结果

55例结核组患者TB-IGRA阳性53例,达96.36%;49例恶性组患者TB-IGRA阳性1例,仅2.04%,两组差异有统计学意义(χ2=88.62,P<0.05)。结核组血清CEA水平[(2.34±1.80)μg/L]显著低于恶性组[(2 358.68±1 069.40)μg/L,t=-15.42,P<0.05];胸腔积液ADA水平[(57.51±26.90)U/L]显著高于恶性组[(14.43±3.57)U/L,t=11.76 ,P<0.05]。结核组中TB-IGRA、涂片镜检、PPD试验以及结核杆菌抗体的阳性率分别为96.36%、22.64%、46.67%和35.14%,TB-IGRA的阳性检测率最高(χ2=78.60,P<0.05);TB-IGRA对诊断结核性胸腔积液的敏感度(95.65%)、特异度(96.77%)、阳性预测值(97.78%)、阴性预测值(93.75%)及准确性(92.42%)最高。

结论

与传统的检测指标相比,TB-IGRA更具灵敏性和特异性;TB-IGRA联合CEA、ADA检测对诊断结核性胸腔积液具有极为重要的临床价值。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical significance of mycobacterium tuberculosis(MTB) related interferon-gamma(IFN-γ) in vitro by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion.

Methods

The clinical data with fifty-five cases with tuberculous and forty-nine cases with malignant pleural effusion were diagnosed and treated in Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University from January to September in 2014.These patients were detected by diagnostic kit for mycobacterium tuberculosis correlative IFN-γ realse assay(TB-IGRA), bacterial smear, purified protein derivative test and mycobacterium tuberculosis antibodies.Then the above diagnostic methods were compared and analyzed.Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) together were detected, and the clinical value of TB-IGRA, CEA and ADA for differential diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion assessed.

Results

There were fifty-three TBIGRA positive cases of fifty-five patients in the tuberculosis group and the positive rate was 96.36%.However, there was only one positive case of forty-nine patients in the malignant group and the positive rate was only 2.04%.The statistical differences were significant between two groups (χ2=88.62, P<0.05). The serum CEA levels in the tuberculosis group[(2.34±1.80)μg/L] were significantly lower than the malignant group[(2358.68±1069.40)μg/L, t=-15.42, P<0.05]. The pleural fluid ADA levels [(57.51±26.90)U/L, t=11.76, P<0.05] were significantly higher than the malignant group[(14.43±3.57)U/L]. The positive rate of TB-IGRA, bacterial smear, purified protein derivative test and mycobacterium tuberculosis antibodies were 96.3%, 22.64%, 46.67% and 35.14%.The positive detection rate of TB-IGRA was highest (χ2= 78.60, P<0.05) of all.At the same time, the sensitivity(95.65%), specificity(96.77%), positive predictive value(97.78%), negative predictive value(93.75) and accuracy(92.42%) of TB-IGRA for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion were highest of all.

Conclusions

Compared with these traditional detection indicators, TB-IGRA is more sensitive and specific.The combination of TB-IGRA with CEA and ADA detection has very important clinical value in the diagnosis of tuberculouspleural effusion.

表1 结核组和恶性组患者胸腔积液血清CEA和胸腔积液ADA水平比较(±s)
表2 结核组患者IGRA与其他诊断方法阳性率比较
表3 TB-IGRA与涂片镜检、PPD试验、结核杆菌抗体对结核性胸腔积液诊断结果的比较(%)
[1]
Diel R, Loddenkemper R, Nienhaus A.Evidence-based comparison of commercial interferon-γ release assays for detecting active TB:a metaanalysis[J].Chest,2010, 137(4):952-968.
[2]
Diel R, Loddenkemper R, Meywald-Walter K,et al.Predictive value of a whole blood IFN-gamma assay for the development of active tuberculosis disease after recent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis[J].Am J RespirCrit Care Med,2008,177 (10):1164-1170.
[3]
潘祥林,王鸿利.诊断学的任务与发展方向[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2013,1(1):8-9.
[4]
Huebner RE, Schein MF, Bass JB Jr.The tuberculin skin test[J].Clin Infect Dis,1993,17(6):968-975.
[5]
LalvaniA.Diagnosing tuberculosis infection in the 21st century:new tools to tackle an old enemy[J].Chest,2007,131(6):1898-1906.
[6]
Fathy MM, Asaad A, Mansour M, etal.Cellular interferon-gamma based assay for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis[J].Egypt J Immunol,2007,14(1):33-41.
[7]
SauzulloI, Mengoni F, Liehtner M,et al.In vivo and in vitro effects of antituberculosis treatment on mycobacterial Interferon-gammaT cell response[J].PloS One,2009,4(4):e5187.
[8]
Bosshard V, Roux-Lombard P, Perneger T,et al.Do results of the T-SPOT.TB interferon-gamma release assay change after treatment of tuberculosis[J].Respir Med,2009,103(1):30-34.
[9]
Carrara S, Vincenti D, Petrosillo N,et al.Use of a T cell-based assay for monitoring efficacy of antituberculosistheropy[J].Clin Infect Dis,2004,38(5):754-756.
[10]
Light RW.Update on tuberculous pleural effusion[J].Respirology,2010,15(3):451-458.
[1] 李可心, 鲁瑞, 田燕, 王文俊, 李维, 万月强, 翟嵩, 刘拉羊. 阿达木单抗治疗银屑病致播散性肺结核一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 245-249.
[2] 成丹, 王骁, 李洪波, 任涛, 王建坤. 肺吸虫病误诊为结核性胸腔积液一例[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 182-186.
[3] 张燕, 杨跃青, 邱峥. IgG 联合血清细胞因子对肺结核并发慢性肺曲霉菌病的诊断意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 809-812.
[4] 白若靖, 郭军. 维生素D对肺部疾病临床意义的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 659-662.
[5] 李文娟, 徐兴祥, 卞家蓉. 胸段脊膜膨入胸腔误诊为胸腔积液一例[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 497-498.
[6] 张红军, 顾兴, 赵延军, 柴雅琴, 李文洁, 师佩, 张海涛. 超声引导下胸膜活检与内科胸腔镜活检诊断一致性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 185-188.
[7] 沙敏, 瞿秋霞, 朱卫东, 陈成. 肺结核与肺结节病相关肉芽肿组织中CXCR5的差异性表达[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 189-194.
[8] 徐辉, 杨勇琼, 刘健, 许剑, 江佳莲, 邓正波. s-ChE、PCT、CRP在肺结核中的表达及继发肺部感染的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 292-295.
[9] 熊欢庆, 王惠琴, 李玉娟, 刘刚, 金发光. TSPOT.TB、Genechip、AFB及其联合应用在结核病中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 19-24.
[10] 蔡小芳, 高慧, 葛军, 邢慧芸, 庄小燕, 李小丁. 多重耐药性肺结核治疗依从性预测分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 51-56.
[11] 马豆豆, 丁艳, 古今, 王丽芳, 石连杰. 以发热为首发表现的强直性脊柱炎合并潜伏性结核感染一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 791-794.
[12] 徐韫健, 吴柳, 尹小毛. 结核病γ-干扰素释放试验假阴性的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 75-79.
[13] 杨麦青, 张云香. 胃癌化疗后浆膜腔大B细胞淋巴瘤一例报道并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 183-187.
[14] 王海珍, 马永明, 姚可盈. 尿激酶治疗结核性包裹性胸腔积液疗效的系统评价与荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 53-61.
[15] 赵方, 邓宇傲, 饶嫚, 刘瑜, 邓秋霞, 张秋月, 张海涛, 宋莹, 王思苑, 贾新云, 刘映霞. HIV/TB 双重感染者发生免疫重建炎性综合征时血清锌及相关炎症因子的变化特征[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 213-217.
阅读次数
全文


摘要