切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 284 -288. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2019.04.014

所属专题: 文献

教学研究

以问题为基础学习结合模拟标准化病人教学模式在急性心肌梗死诊断教学中的应用
戴雯1, 魏广和1,(), 张韶辉2, 赵新1, 代姗姗1, 张娜娜2   
  1. 1. 272067 济宁医学院临床医学院
    2. 272000 济宁医学院附属医院心内科
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-29 出版日期:2019-11-26
  • 通信作者: 魏广和
  • 基金资助:
    济宁医学院教育科学研究课题(16033)

Application of problem-based learning combined with simulated standardized patient teaching model in teaching diagnostics of acute myocardial infarction

Wen Dai1, Guanghe Wei1,(), Shaohui Zhang2, Xin Zhao1, Shanshan Dai1, Nana Zhang2   

  1. 1. Clinical Medicine, Jining Medical University, Jining 272067, China
    2. Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272029, China
  • Received:2018-11-29 Published:2019-11-26
  • Corresponding author: Guanghe Wei
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wei Guanghe, Email:
引用本文:

戴雯, 魏广和, 张韶辉, 赵新, 代姗姗, 张娜娜. 以问题为基础学习结合模拟标准化病人教学模式在急性心肌梗死诊断教学中的应用[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2019, 07(04): 284-288.

Wen Dai, Guanghe Wei, Shaohui Zhang, Xin Zhao, Shanshan Dai, Nana Zhang. Application of problem-based learning combined with simulated standardized patient teaching model in teaching diagnostics of acute myocardial infarction[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(04): 284-288.

目的

探讨以问题为基础学习(PBL)模拟标准化病人(SP)教学模式在急性心肌梗死(AMI)诊断教学中的应用。

方法

2016年3月至2017年3月,选取在济宁医学院附属医院心内科见习的2013级本科临床医学专业3个班级学生(共153例)作为研究对象,由同一名教授进行理论课授课,授课内容均为AMI诊断方法。随机数字表法分为对照组、PBL组及试验组3组,每班即每组各51例。对照组行传统教学模式,PBL组行PBL+理论教学模式,试验组行PBL+SP教学模式。比较3组理论成绩、病历书写、学生满意度及教师对学生表现满意度。

结果

试验组病历书写(80.56±7.23)分、理论知识(79.84±5.63)分高于PBL组[(76.24±6.45)分、(74.28±5.05)分]、对照组[(70.21±6.13)分、(69.56±4.89)分],差异有统计学意义(F=31.45,49.95;均P<0.01);试验组体格检查(17.38±1.27)分、病史(49.47±1.34)分、主诉(16.82±0.67)分等综合能力考核成绩评分高于PBL组[(14.23±1.06)分、(44.88±1.21)分、(13.26±0.54)分]、对照组[(11.55±0.98)分、(40.52±1.04)分、(10.97±0.61)分],差异有统计学意义(F=352.43,705.92,1 195.02;均P<0.01);试验组教师对学生表现满意度82.35%(42/51)高于PBL组60.78%(31/51)、对照组43.14%(22/51),差异有统计学意义(χ2=16.72,P<0.01)。

结论

PBL结合SP教学模式应用于AMI诊断教学中,可提高学生理论考试成绩及综合能力,提高学生与教师满意度,改善师生关系,提高教学质量。

Objective

To explore the application of problem-based learning (PBL) combined with simulated standardized patient (SP) teaching mode in teaching diagnostics of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Methods

From March 2016 to March 2017, 153 students in three classes of undergraduate clinical medicine specialty in grade 2013 were selected as the subjects of study, who were taught by the same professor in the theoretical courses, and the teaching contents were all about the diagnostic methods of AMI. The students were randomly divided into control group, PBL group and experimental group with 51 cases in each group. The control group received traditional teaching mode, the PBL group received PBL and theoretical teaching mode, and the experimental group received PBL and SP teaching mode. The theoretical results, medical record writing, students′ satisfaction and teachers′ satisfaction with students′ performance were compared among the three groups.

Results

The scores of medical record writing [(80.56±7.23)points] and theoretical knowledge [(79.84±5.63)points] in the experimental group were higher than those in the PBL group [(76.24±6.45)points, (74.28±5.05)points] and control group [(70.21±6.13)points, (69.56±4.89)points]. The differences were statistically significant (F1=31.45, 49.95, all P<0.01). The scores of physical examination [(17.38±1.27)points], medical history [(49.47±1.34)points] and chief complaint [(16.82±0.67)points] of the experimental group were higher than those of PBL group [(14.23±1.06)points, (44.88±1.21)points, (13.26±0.54)points] and control group [(11.55±0.98)points, (40.52±1.04)points, (10.97±0.61)points]. The differences were statistically significant (F=352.43, 705.92, 1 195.02, all P<0.01). Teachers′ satisfaction with students′ performance in the experimental group was (42/51, 82.35%) higher than that in the PBL group (60.78%, 37/51) and the control group (43.14%, 22/51) (χ2=16.72, P<0.01).

Conclusion

The application of PBL combined with SP teaching mode in teaching diagnostics of AMI can effectively improve students′ learning enthusiasm and initiative, improve students′ and teachers′ satisfaction, improve teacher-student relationship and teaching quality.

表1 医学本科生不同教学模式病历书写、理论与实践知识考核情况比较(分,±s)
表2 医学本科生不同教学模式综合能力考核情况比较(分,±s)
表3 医学本科生对不同教学模式教学满意度比较
表4 教师对医学本科生不同教学模式表现满意度比较
[1]
Thiele H, Schuler G, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock:design and rationale of the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock Ⅱ (IABP-SHOCK Ⅱ) trial[J].Am Heart J,2015,169(4):e7-e8.
[2]
卢书明,梁丽娜,孟华,等.慕课教学模式在诊断学教学中的应用[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2017,5(1):37-39.
[3]
祝海洲,雷学锋,张磊,等.三明治教学法应用于医学桥梁课合堂班教学的探讨[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2017,5(1):31-33.
[4]
齐殿君,于晓松,王爽,等.开展以问题为基础学习改善医学生交流恐惧的远期研究[J].中华医学教育杂志,2016,36(2):249-252.
[5]
马瑞,王玲珠,吴娟娟,等.医学生对临床见习中诊断学新型教学模式认识状况的调查[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2017,5(1):26-30.
[6]
黄蕾,管晓枫,苏娜,等.以问题为基础学习教学对医学生批判性思维培养效果的研究[J].中华医学教育杂志,2015,35(6):888-891.
[7]
赵英杰,李颖,颜凡辉,等.急性心肌梗死缺血后处理对患者发生心肌梗死后心力衰竭的影响[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2018,6(3):185-188.
[8]
Li J, Dreyer RP, Li X, et al. China patient-centered evaluative assessment of cardiac events prospective study of acute myocardial infarction:study design[J].Chin Medical J(Engl),2016,129(1):72-80.
[9]
贾雪,曾雯,张琴,等.Seminar教学法与传统讲授教学法对国内临床医学生教学效果的系统评价[J].华西医学,2018,33(3):332-338.
[10]
杜爱玲,王新友,杨世昌.以问题为基础教学模式和传统教学模式在我国神经病学临床实习教学效果的Meta分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2015,32(3):286-288.
[11]
Ross JG, Burrell SA.Standardized patient simulation to facilitate learning in evidence-based oncology symptom management[J].J Nurs Educ,2018,57(4):250-253.
[12]
Speeney N, Kameg KM, Cline T, et al. Impact of a standardized patient simulation on undergraduate nursing student knowledge and perceived competency of the care of a patient diagnosed with schizophrenia[J].Arch Psychiatr Nurs,2018,32(6):845-849.
[13]
Bond WF, Gonzalez HC, Funk AM, et al. Deliberate practice with standardized patient actors and the development of formative feedback for advance care planning facilitators[J].J Palliat Med,2017,20(6):631-637.
[14]
杨桦.PBL教学方法联合技能考核在妇产科教学中的应用研究[J].中国医刊,2015,50(10):108-110.
[15]
王喆,杨新春.PBL教学模式在临床医学教学中的应用[J].中国病案,2016,17(7):91-93.
[16]
邓可武,史旭波.PBL教学法在心内科住院医师规范化培训教学中的应用[J].中国医药导刊,2016,18(7):745-746.
[17]
周艳丽,史铁英,陆靖,等.PBL结合案例教学法在心内科护理本科生临床实践教学中的应用[J].重庆医学,2015,44(16):2291-2293.
[18]
金国玺,高涌,毕娅欣,等.内科学教学中CBL和PBL教学法的联合运用[J].中华全科医学,2016,14(4):672-675.
[1] 杨士慷, 曹光磊. 膝骨关节炎三种术式患者满意度的术前影响因素[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 390-397.
[2] 王友芳, 李兴超, 刘清敏, 刘德彬, 刘松伍, 郭冬冬, 车峰远. 应激性高血糖指数对经皮冠状动脉介入术后急性心肌梗死患者发生主要不良心脑血管事件的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 124-129.
[3] 花卉, 许晨莹, 刘金凤. 盆底肌训练时机对高龄初产妇产后盆底肌张力及性功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 284-291.
[4] 刘欣茹, 杜鹃, 代健健, 辛秀娟, 高梨梨. SBAR沟通模式在急诊腹股沟疝手术患者中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 451-455.
[5] 邓世君, 刘晓青, 刘权兴. 信息化管理在肺癌围手术期中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 466-468.
[6] 刘亮, 肖浩, 崔晓磊, 吕宝谱, 张睿, 郑拓康, 孟庆冰, 姚冬奇, 田英平, 高恒波. 急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者预后因素分析97例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 183-189.
[7] 林永俭, 谢雪花, 郝莉茹, 刘丽, 马英东. 优化急诊绿色通道对急性心肌梗死介入治疗患者救治时间的影响[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 185-189.
[8] 刘聪辉, 何浩然, 黄一诺, 张凤, 王凡月, 郝翰. 膳食铜补充对大鼠心肌梗死后心肌基质金属蛋白酶2表达水平及血流动力学的影响[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 166-172.
[9] 刘艳丽, 戴爱国, 胡兆勇, 邹芳, 刘惠娜, 逯晶. 基于"多元协同式"的诊断学课程思政体系的构建与实践[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 125-127.
[10] 郭方明, 赵明俐, 颜凡辉, 刘萌萌, 王阳, 赵英杰, 刘远航, 张艳芬, 詹景冬. 光学相干断层成像在急性心肌梗死冠状动脉分层斑块病变中的应用[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 73-79.
[11] 姜晓宇, 付迪, 陈雪英, 申程, 甘立军. 胶原在心肌梗死后心脏重构中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 25-30.
[12] 徐来英, 程效, 戴亨纷, 侯俊凉, 苏怡林, 张彦. 药物联合个体化精准恒定功率运动疗法治疗心肌梗死术后频发室性早搏一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 176-179.
[13] 单兴华, 唐文栋, 赵仙先. 延伸导管在室间隔穿孔介入治疗的新应用一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 126-128.
[14] 田欢, 吴艳凯, 宋波, 魏榕辰, 张艳, 李月戈, 武柏林. 基于心脏磁共振多模态特征评估急性心肌梗死患者预后[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 17-25.
[15] 郑屹, 刘莹, 张煜坤, 李广平, 陈康寅, 刘彤. 既往及新发心房颤动对急性心肌梗死患者远期卒中风险的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 406-417.
阅读次数
全文


摘要