切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (01) : 18 -22. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2020.01.004

所属专题: 文献

超声诊断

孤立性纤维性肿瘤超声造影和病理学诊断特征分析
吴凤芸1, 滕鑫1, 韩彤亮1,()   
  1. 1. 266000 青岛市市立医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-26 出版日期:2020-02-26
  • 通信作者: 韩彤亮
  • 基金资助:
    青岛市医药科研指导计划项目(2018-WJZD003)

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and pathological analysis of solitary fibrous tumors

Fengyun Wu1, Xin Teng1, Tongliang Han1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266000, China
  • Received:2019-12-26 Published:2020-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Tongliang Han
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Han Tongliang, Email:
引用本文:

吴凤芸, 滕鑫, 韩彤亮. 孤立性纤维性肿瘤超声造影和病理学诊断特征分析[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2020, 08(01): 18-22.

Fengyun Wu, Xin Teng, Tongliang Han. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and pathological analysis of solitary fibrous tumors[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(01): 18-22.

目的

探讨孤立性纤维性肿瘤超声造影和病理学的诊断特征。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年12月青岛市市立医院经手术与病理证实的6例孤立性纤维性肿瘤患者的超声造影和病理学资料,总结其诊断学特征。

结果

6例患者中,男性3例,女性3例,年龄32~65岁,1例位于腹壁,1例位于足背,1例位于眼眶,2例位于胸壁,1例位于乳腺。6例孤立性纤维性肿瘤二维超声表现为边界清楚或不清、边缘光滑的低回声或中等或混合回声肿块,4例呈椭圆形,2例呈圆形;2例回声欠均匀伴液化,4例回声较均匀;4例可见丰富的分支状血流信号,血管阻力较小。超声造影均呈动脉期均匀性或不均匀性高增强,2例病灶增强范围较常规超声增大,4例病灶增强范围较常规超声无明显增大,延迟期无明显廓清,呈略高增强。6例均经手术切除,4例可见完整包膜,2例与周围组织界限不清;4例有丰富的血管供应,2例可见坏死液化区,4例质韧,2例质地中等。术后常规苏木精-伊红(HE)染色示间叶组织来源肿瘤,瘤细胞呈梭型,围绕血管生长,呈旋涡状或索状,细胞聚集区与稀疏区交替分布;肿瘤细胞分布不均,间质内见粗细不等红染的胶原纤维及丰富树枝状薄壁血管;4例核有轻度异型性,核分裂象少见,2例核有中度异型性,核分裂象多见。免疫组化结果示:CD34阳性(4/6),B淋巴细胞瘤2(Bcl-2)阳性(5/6),波形蛋白(Vimentin)阳性(5/6),CD99阳性(6/6),平滑肌肌动蛋白(SMA)阳性(4/6),S100阴性(6/6),符合孤立性纤维性肿瘤的诊断。

结论

孤立性纤维性肿瘤的超声造影和病理学具有一定的特征性,有助于其诊断。

Objective

To investigate the diagnostic features of ultrasonography and pathology of solitary fibrous tumors (SFT).

Methods

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and pathology data of 6 patients with solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) confirmed by surgery and pathology in Qingdao Municipal Hospital from January 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, and the diagnostic characteristics were summarized.

Results

Three cases were male, and three cases were female in six patients. The ages range from 32 to 65. One case was located in the abdominal wall, 1 case was located in the foot dorsum, 1 case was located in the eye socket, 2 cases were located in the chest wall and 1 case was located in mammary gland. The two-dimensional ultrasonographic manifestations of 6 cases of SFT were hypoechoic, moderate or mixed echogenic masses with clear or unclear boundaries and smooth edges. 4 cases were oval, 2 cases were round, 2 cases had non-uniform echo with liquefaction, 4 cases had relatively uniform echo, 4 cases had abundant branching blood flow signals, and the vascular resistance was small. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography showed high enhancement of uniformity or unevenness in the arterial phase, 2 cases showed increased lesion enhancement range compared with conventional ultrasound, 4 cases showed no significant increase in lesion enhancement range compared with conventional ultrasound, and there was no significant clearance in the delayed phase, showing slightly higher enhancement. All tumors of the 6 cases were surgically removed, 4 cases had complete capsule, 2 cases had unclear boundary with surrounding tissue, 4 cases had abundant vascular supply, 2 cases had necrotic liquefaction zone, 4 cases had ductile, 2 cases had medium texture. Postoperative routine HE staining: source of mesenchymal tissue tumors and tumor cells showed spindle type, around blood vessel growth, a spiral or funicular, cell clusters alternating with sparse area distribution of tumor cell distribution. Unequal thickness and red color of collagen fibers and abundant dendritic parenchyma vessels were found in the interstitium. Four cases of nuclear had mild atypia and few mitotic, while 2 cases of nuclear had moderate atypia and visible mitotic. Immunohistochemical results: CD34 positive (4/6), Bcl-2 positive (5/6), Vimentin positive (5/6), CD99 positive (6/6), SMA positive (4/6). S100 negative (6/6), consistented with the the diagnosis of SFT.

Conclusion

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and pathology of SFT have certain characteristics, which are helpful for their diagnosis.

表1 6例孤立性纤维性肿瘤患者的临床特征
图1 腹壁孤立性性纤维性肿瘤患者二维超声及彩色多普勒超声图像
图2 腹壁孤立性纤维性肿瘤患者超声造影图像
表2 6例孤立性纤维性肿瘤患者的二维超声特征及超声造影表现
图3 腹壁孤立性纤维性肿瘤患者的病理图像(HE ×40)
[1]
Klemperer P, Rabin CB. Primary neoplasms of the pleura[J]. Arch Pathol,1931(11):385-412.
[2]
Yilmaz C, Kabatas S, Ozen OI,et al. Solitary brous tumor[J]. J Clin Neurosci,2009,16(12):1578-1581.
[3]
薛霜,龚智泉,许梅,等. 乳腺及阴茎海绵体孤立性纤维性肿瘤2例并文献复习[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2016,32(9):1050-1051.
[4]
谭丽珊,陈智慧,陈玉英,等.胸膜孤立性纤维性肿瘤的临床病理特征分析[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2016(1):8-10.
[5]
Demicco EG, Park MS, Araujo DM,et al.Solitary fibrous tumor: a clinicopathological study of 110 cases and proposed risk assessment model[J]. Mod Pathol,2012,25(10):1298-1306.
[6]
Poyraz A, KilicD, Hatipoglu A,et al.Pedunculated solitary fibrous tumors arising from the pleura[J].Monaldi Arch Chest Dis,2006,65(3):165-168.
[7]
隋愿,史振乾,史富磊.胸部良恶性孤立性纤维性瘤的MSCT表现与病理对照[J].医学影像学杂志,2018,28(4):595-598.
[8]
袁媛,宋欣,桂秋萍.脑膜孤立性纤维性肿瘤/血管外皮细胞瘤18例临床病理分析[J].诊断病理学杂志,2017,24(11):801-805.
[9]
项光涨,丁国勇,刘克昌,等.胸膜孤立性纤维瘤的影像学诊断[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2015,26(11):827-830.
[10]
黄海建,曲利娟,郑智勇.孤立性纤维性肿瘤研究进展[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2011,19(6):1255-1258.
[11]
肖潇,肖后生,杨杰.孤立性纤维性肿瘤6例超声诊断及病理分析[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2013,38(10):1334-1337.
[12]
武鑫瑞,沈小英,景清萍,等.眼眶恶性孤立性纤维性肿瘤的临床病理分析并文献复习[J].实用癌症杂志,2017,32(1):108-111.
[13]
孙丽娟,李成业,王群栓.恶性孤立性纤维瘤的影像学表现(附5例报道)[J].医学影像学杂志,2017,27(11):2114-2118.
[14]
徐雷,陈廷港,林旭波,等.胸膜外孤立性纤维瘤影像学表现与病理对照分析[J].浙江医学,2018,40(15):1705-1709.
[15]
Sawada N, Ishiwata TZ, Maeda刊S,et al.Immunohistochemical localization of endothelial cell markers in solitary fibrous tumor[J]. Pathol Int,2015,52(12):769-776.
[16]
Gold JS, Antonescu CR, Hajdu C,et al.Clinicopathologic correlates of solitary fibrous tumors[J]. Cancer,2002,94(4):1057-1068.
[17]
吕志红,俞磊,韩鄂辉,等.超声造影在甲状腺结节鉴别诊断中的价值[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2016,4(2):73-77.
[18]
梅丽丽,聂磊,曾书娥.超声造影时间-强度曲线在肝脏恶性肿瘤射频消融中的应用价值[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2018,6(4):226-231.
[19]
袁媛,宋欣,桂秋萍.脑膜孤立性纤维性肿瘤/血管外皮细胞瘤18例临床病理分析[J].诊断病理学杂志,2017,24 (11):801-805.
[20]
Bishop JA, RekhtmanN, Chun J,et al. Malignant solitary fibrous tumor[J]. Cancer Cytopatho,2010,118(2):83-89.
[21]
Chan JK. Solitary fibrous tumor-everywhere,and a diagnosis in vogue[J]. Histopathology,1997,31(6):568-576.
[22]
罗丽花,张婉仪,阮君,等.10例孤立性纤维性肿瘤临床病理学研究[J].中国现代医生,2014,52(35):56-59.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[3] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[4] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[5] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[6] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[7] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[8] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[9] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[10] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[11] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[12] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
[13] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[14] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[15] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?