切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (01) : 18 -22. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2020.01.004

所属专题: 文献

超声诊断

孤立性纤维性肿瘤超声造影和病理学诊断特征分析
吴凤芸1, 滕鑫1, 韩彤亮1,()   
  1. 1. 266000 青岛市市立医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-26 出版日期:2020-02-26
  • 通信作者: 韩彤亮
  • 基金资助:
    青岛市医药科研指导计划项目(2018-WJZD003)

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and pathological analysis of solitary fibrous tumors

Fengyun Wu1, Xin Teng1, Tongliang Han1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266000, China
  • Received:2019-12-26 Published:2020-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Tongliang Han
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Han Tongliang, Email:
引用本文:

吴凤芸, 滕鑫, 韩彤亮. 孤立性纤维性肿瘤超声造影和病理学诊断特征分析[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2020, 08(01): 18-22.

Fengyun Wu, Xin Teng, Tongliang Han. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and pathological analysis of solitary fibrous tumors[J]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(01): 18-22.

目的

探讨孤立性纤维性肿瘤超声造影和病理学的诊断特征。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年12月青岛市市立医院经手术与病理证实的6例孤立性纤维性肿瘤患者的超声造影和病理学资料,总结其诊断学特征。

结果

6例患者中,男性3例,女性3例,年龄32~65岁,1例位于腹壁,1例位于足背,1例位于眼眶,2例位于胸壁,1例位于乳腺。6例孤立性纤维性肿瘤二维超声表现为边界清楚或不清、边缘光滑的低回声或中等或混合回声肿块,4例呈椭圆形,2例呈圆形;2例回声欠均匀伴液化,4例回声较均匀;4例可见丰富的分支状血流信号,血管阻力较小。超声造影均呈动脉期均匀性或不均匀性高增强,2例病灶增强范围较常规超声增大,4例病灶增强范围较常规超声无明显增大,延迟期无明显廓清,呈略高增强。6例均经手术切除,4例可见完整包膜,2例与周围组织界限不清;4例有丰富的血管供应,2例可见坏死液化区,4例质韧,2例质地中等。术后常规苏木精-伊红(HE)染色示间叶组织来源肿瘤,瘤细胞呈梭型,围绕血管生长,呈旋涡状或索状,细胞聚集区与稀疏区交替分布;肿瘤细胞分布不均,间质内见粗细不等红染的胶原纤维及丰富树枝状薄壁血管;4例核有轻度异型性,核分裂象少见,2例核有中度异型性,核分裂象多见。免疫组化结果示:CD34阳性(4/6),B淋巴细胞瘤2(Bcl-2)阳性(5/6),波形蛋白(Vimentin)阳性(5/6),CD99阳性(6/6),平滑肌肌动蛋白(SMA)阳性(4/6),S100阴性(6/6),符合孤立性纤维性肿瘤的诊断。

结论

孤立性纤维性肿瘤的超声造影和病理学具有一定的特征性,有助于其诊断。

Objective

To investigate the diagnostic features of ultrasonography and pathology of solitary fibrous tumors (SFT).

Methods

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and pathology data of 6 patients with solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) confirmed by surgery and pathology in Qingdao Municipal Hospital from January 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, and the diagnostic characteristics were summarized.

Results

Three cases were male, and three cases were female in six patients. The ages range from 32 to 65. One case was located in the abdominal wall, 1 case was located in the foot dorsum, 1 case was located in the eye socket, 2 cases were located in the chest wall and 1 case was located in mammary gland. The two-dimensional ultrasonographic manifestations of 6 cases of SFT were hypoechoic, moderate or mixed echogenic masses with clear or unclear boundaries and smooth edges. 4 cases were oval, 2 cases were round, 2 cases had non-uniform echo with liquefaction, 4 cases had relatively uniform echo, 4 cases had abundant branching blood flow signals, and the vascular resistance was small. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography showed high enhancement of uniformity or unevenness in the arterial phase, 2 cases showed increased lesion enhancement range compared with conventional ultrasound, 4 cases showed no significant increase in lesion enhancement range compared with conventional ultrasound, and there was no significant clearance in the delayed phase, showing slightly higher enhancement. All tumors of the 6 cases were surgically removed, 4 cases had complete capsule, 2 cases had unclear boundary with surrounding tissue, 4 cases had abundant vascular supply, 2 cases had necrotic liquefaction zone, 4 cases had ductile, 2 cases had medium texture. Postoperative routine HE staining: source of mesenchymal tissue tumors and tumor cells showed spindle type, around blood vessel growth, a spiral or funicular, cell clusters alternating with sparse area distribution of tumor cell distribution. Unequal thickness and red color of collagen fibers and abundant dendritic parenchyma vessels were found in the interstitium. Four cases of nuclear had mild atypia and few mitotic, while 2 cases of nuclear had moderate atypia and visible mitotic. Immunohistochemical results: CD34 positive (4/6), Bcl-2 positive (5/6), Vimentin positive (5/6), CD99 positive (6/6), SMA positive (4/6). S100 negative (6/6), consistented with the the diagnosis of SFT.

Conclusion

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and pathology of SFT have certain characteristics, which are helpful for their diagnosis.

表1 6例孤立性纤维性肿瘤患者的临床特征
图1 腹壁孤立性性纤维性肿瘤患者二维超声及彩色多普勒超声图像
图2 腹壁孤立性纤维性肿瘤患者超声造影图像
表2 6例孤立性纤维性肿瘤患者的二维超声特征及超声造影表现
图3 腹壁孤立性纤维性肿瘤患者的病理图像(HE ×40)
[1]
Klemperer P, Rabin CB. Primary neoplasms of the pleura[J]. Arch Pathol,1931(11):385-412.
[2]
Yilmaz C, Kabatas S, Ozen OI,et al. Solitary brous tumor[J]. J Clin Neurosci,2009,16(12):1578-1581.
[3]
薛霜,龚智泉,许梅,等. 乳腺及阴茎海绵体孤立性纤维性肿瘤2例并文献复习[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2016,32(9):1050-1051.
[4]
谭丽珊,陈智慧,陈玉英,等.胸膜孤立性纤维性肿瘤的临床病理特征分析[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2016(1):8-10.
[5]
Demicco EG, Park MS, Araujo DM,et al.Solitary fibrous tumor: a clinicopathological study of 110 cases and proposed risk assessment model[J]. Mod Pathol,2012,25(10):1298-1306.
[6]
Poyraz A, KilicD, Hatipoglu A,et al.Pedunculated solitary fibrous tumors arising from the pleura[J].Monaldi Arch Chest Dis,2006,65(3):165-168.
[7]
隋愿,史振乾,史富磊.胸部良恶性孤立性纤维性瘤的MSCT表现与病理对照[J].医学影像学杂志,2018,28(4):595-598.
[8]
袁媛,宋欣,桂秋萍.脑膜孤立性纤维性肿瘤/血管外皮细胞瘤18例临床病理分析[J].诊断病理学杂志,2017,24(11):801-805.
[9]
项光涨,丁国勇,刘克昌,等.胸膜孤立性纤维瘤的影像学诊断[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2015,26(11):827-830.
[10]
黄海建,曲利娟,郑智勇.孤立性纤维性肿瘤研究进展[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2011,19(6):1255-1258.
[11]
肖潇,肖后生,杨杰.孤立性纤维性肿瘤6例超声诊断及病理分析[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2013,38(10):1334-1337.
[12]
武鑫瑞,沈小英,景清萍,等.眼眶恶性孤立性纤维性肿瘤的临床病理分析并文献复习[J].实用癌症杂志,2017,32(1):108-111.
[13]
孙丽娟,李成业,王群栓.恶性孤立性纤维瘤的影像学表现(附5例报道)[J].医学影像学杂志,2017,27(11):2114-2118.
[14]
徐雷,陈廷港,林旭波,等.胸膜外孤立性纤维瘤影像学表现与病理对照分析[J].浙江医学,2018,40(15):1705-1709.
[15]
Sawada N, Ishiwata TZ, Maeda刊S,et al.Immunohistochemical localization of endothelial cell markers in solitary fibrous tumor[J]. Pathol Int,2015,52(12):769-776.
[16]
Gold JS, Antonescu CR, Hajdu C,et al.Clinicopathologic correlates of solitary fibrous tumors[J]. Cancer,2002,94(4):1057-1068.
[17]
吕志红,俞磊,韩鄂辉,等.超声造影在甲状腺结节鉴别诊断中的价值[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2016,4(2):73-77.
[18]
梅丽丽,聂磊,曾书娥.超声造影时间-强度曲线在肝脏恶性肿瘤射频消融中的应用价值[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志,2018,6(4):226-231.
[19]
袁媛,宋欣,桂秋萍.脑膜孤立性纤维性肿瘤/血管外皮细胞瘤18例临床病理分析[J].诊断病理学杂志,2017,24 (11):801-805.
[20]
Bishop JA, RekhtmanN, Chun J,et al. Malignant solitary fibrous tumor[J]. Cancer Cytopatho,2010,118(2):83-89.
[21]
Chan JK. Solitary fibrous tumor-everywhere,and a diagnosis in vogue[J]. Histopathology,1997,31(6):568-576.
[22]
罗丽花,张婉仪,阮君,等.10例孤立性纤维性肿瘤临床病理学研究[J].中国现代医生,2014,52(35):56-59.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[3] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[4] 朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 姜波, 李楠, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 904-910.
[5] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[6] 陈舜, 薛恩生, 叶琴. PDCA在持续改进超声危急值管理制度中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 974-978.
[7] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[8] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[9] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[10] 张丽丽, 陈莉, 余美琴, 聂小艳, 王婧玲, 刘婷. PDCA循环法在超声浅表器官亚专科建设中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 717-721.
[11] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[12] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
[13] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[14] 徐军, 姬园园, 陈君平, 王健. 伴菊形团结构的脑膜瘤合并颅骨侵犯一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 916-919.
[15] 周婷, 孙培培, 张二明, 安欣华, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断现状调查[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 790-797.
阅读次数
全文


摘要