切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 226 -231. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2021.04.003

超声诊断

超声监测肱动脉血管参数对自体动静脉内瘘并发症的诊断价值
张晗1, 刘姣1, 王恒进2, 张明3, 吴敏1, 孔文韬1,()   
  1. 1. 210009 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院超声科
    2. 210009 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院肾内科
    3. 210009 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院血管外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-19 出版日期:2021-11-26
  • 通信作者: 孔文韬
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81671701); "十三五"南京市卫生青年人才培养工程资助项目(QRX17011)

Diagnostic value of ultrasonic monitoring of brachial artery vascular parameters for autologous arteriovenous fistula complications

Han Zhang1, Jiao Liu1, Hengjin Wang2, Ming Zhang3, Min Wu1, Wentao Kong1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210009, China
    2. Department of Nephrology, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210009, China
    3. Department of Vascular Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210009, China
  • Received:2020-10-19 Published:2021-11-26
  • Corresponding author: Wentao Kong
引用本文:

张晗, 刘姣, 王恒进, 张明, 吴敏, 孔文韬. 超声监测肱动脉血管参数对自体动静脉内瘘并发症的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 226-231.

Han Zhang, Jiao Liu, Hengjin Wang, Ming Zhang, Min Wu, Wentao Kong. Diagnostic value of ultrasonic monitoring of brachial artery vascular parameters for autologous arteriovenous fistula complications[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(04): 226-231.

目的

探讨超声监测肱动脉血管参数对自体动静脉内瘘并发症的诊断价值。

方法

回顾性分析2016年3月至2020年6月于南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院超声科行自体动静脉内瘘检查的106例慢性肾脏病患者的超声影像资料,根据超声检查有无常见并发症(头静脉血栓、头静脉狭窄、头静脉瘤样扩张),分为无并发症组(n=57)与常见并发症组(n=49);常见并发症组包括:头静脉血栓组(8例),头静脉狭窄组(31例),头静脉瘤样扩张组(21例),其中10例患者同时发生两种及两种以上的并发症。分析各组超声监测肱动脉内径、收缩期峰值流速(PSV)、舒张末期流速(EDV)、阻力指数(RI)、时间平均流速(TAMV)、搏动指数(PI)以及流量参数,比较各组间肱动脉血管参数的差异,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,比较各参数对头静脉狭窄的诊断价值。

结果

无并发症组肱动脉PSV[(149.42±41.95)cm/s]、EDV[(71.75±23.62)cm/s]、TAMV[(59.25±19.79)cm/s]、流量[(898.26±357.09)ml/min]均高于常见并发症组[(128.91±40.42)cm/s,(56.19±29.98)cm/s,(46.82±23.69)cm/s,659.00(291.50,934.50)ml/min],均差异有统计学意义(t=2.55,2.99,2.94;Z=-2.60;均P<0.05)。无并发症组PI[1.38(1.13,1.61)]低于常见并发症组[1.52(1.11,2.40)],差异具有统计学意义(Z=2.13,P<0.05)。肱动脉内径、PSV、EDV、RI、PI、TAMV及流量对头静脉狭窄诊断的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.71、0.73、0.76、0.70、0.68、0.75、0.81;特异度分别为68.42%、75.44%、91.23%、89.47%、92.98%、92.98%、91.23%;敏感度分别为67.74%、64.52%、54.84%、48.39%、51.61%、54.84%、61.29%(均P<0.01)。

结论

超声监测肱动脉血管参数对自体动静脉内瘘并发症有一定的诊断价值,肱动脉流量对头静脉狭窄的诊断价值最大。

Objective

To explore the diagnostic value of brachial artery vascular ultrasound inspection for autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) complications.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of ultrasound imaging data was applied to 106 patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing AVF in the Ultrasonic Department of Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University from March 2016 to June 2020. Patients were divided into non-complication group (n=57) and common complication group (n=49) according to ultrasound examination results. The latter was further divided into cephalic venous thrombosis group (n=8), cephalic venous stenosis group (n=31) and cephalic venous aneurysm-like dilatation group (n=21), according to the type of complications, 10 patients had two or more complications. The diameter, peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), resistance index (RI), time-averaged mean velocity (TAMV), pulsatility index (PI), and blood flow of brachial artery were measured by ultrasound. The parameters of brachial artery were compared between groups, and the diagnostic value for cephalic vein stenosis was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve.

Results

The PSV[(149.42±41.95)cm/s], EDV[(71.75±23.62)cm/s], TAMV[(59.25±19.79)cm/s], blood flow [(898.26±357.09)ml/min] of brachial artery in non-complication group were higher than those of common complication group[(128.91±40.42)cm/s, (56.19±29.98)cm/s, (46.82±23.69)cm/s, 659.00(291.50, 934.50)ml/min], with significant differences (t=2.55, 2.98, 2.94, Z=-2.60, all P<0.05). PI[1.38(1.13, 1.61)] in non-complication group was lower than that of the common complication group [1.52(1.11, 2.40)], with significant difference (Z=2.13, P<0.05). The areas under the ROC curve of brachial artery diameter, PSV, EDV, RI, PI, TAMV and blood flow for the diagnosis of cephalic venous stenosis were 0.71, 0.73, 0.76, 0.70, 0.68, 0.75, 0.81. Specificities were 68.42%, 75.44%, 91.23%, 89.47%, 92.98%, 92.98%, 91.23%, while sensibilities were 67.74%, 64.52%, 54.84%, 48.39%, 51.61%, 54.84%, 61.29% (all P<0.01).

Conclusion

Ultrasound monitoring of brachial artery vascular parameters has certain diagnostic value for AVF complications, and the brachial artery flow has the greatest diagnostic value for cephalic venous stenosis.

表1 两组AVF患者肱动脉血管参数比较
图1 慢性肾脏病行自体动静脉内瘘患者发生头静脉狭窄的超声多普勒图像
图2 慢性肾脏病行自体动静脉内瘘患者发生头静脉血栓的超声多普勒图像
图3 慢性肾脏病行自体动静脉内瘘患者发生头静脉瘤样扩张的超声多普勒图像
表2 AVF患者不同类型并发症组与无并发症组肱动脉流量比较(ml/min)
表3 肱动脉血管参数对AVF患者并发头静脉狭窄的诊断价值
图4 肱动脉不同超声血管参数诊断AVF患者并发头静脉狭窄的ROC曲线
[1]
Zhang L, Wang F, Wang L, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in China:a cross-sectional survey [J].Lancet2012379(9818):815-822.
[2]
Ocak G, Rotmans JI, Vossen CY, et al. Type of arteriovenous vascular access and association with patency and mortality[J].BMC Nephrol20134(14):79-86.
[3]
Kukita K, Ohira S, Amano I,et al.2011 update Japanese society for dialysis therapy guidelines of vascular access construction and repair for chronic hemodialysis[J].Ther Apher Dial201519(Suppl 1):1-39.
[4]
Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T,et al.KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access:2019 update[J].Am J Kidney Dis202075(4 Suppl 2):S1-S164.
[5]
Polkinghorne KR, Chin GK, MacGinley RJ, et al.KHA-CARI guideline:vascular access-central venous catheters,arteriovenous fistulae and arteriovenous grafts[J].Nephrology (Carlton)201318(11):701-705.
[6]
Masud A, Costanzo EJ, Zuckerman R,et al.The complications of vascular access in hemodialysis[J].Semin Thromb Hemost201844(1):57-59.
[7]
Leivaditis K, Panagoutsos S, Roumeliotis A,et al.Vascular access for hemodialysis:postoperative evaluation and function monitoring[J].Int Urol Nephrol201446(2):403-409.
[8]
徐涛,宁春平,周茂平,等.肱动脉多普勒超声对血液透析自体动静脉内瘘的诊断价值[J].临床超声医学杂志201921(12):891-894.
[9]
Ferring M, Henderson J, Wilmink A,et al.Vascular ultrasound for the pre-operative evaluation prior to arteriovenous fistula formation for haemodialysis:review of the evidence[J].Nephrol Dial Transplant200823(6):1809-1815.
[10]
Malovrh M.The role of sonography in the planning of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis[J]. Semin Dial200316(4):299-303.
[11]
Fahrtash F, Kairaitis L, Gruenewald S,et al.Defining a significant stenosis in an autologous radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis[J].Semin Dial201124(2):231-238.
[12]
朱宇莉,丁红,范培丽,等.彩超对维持性血透患者自体动静脉内瘘血流量及血流动力学的监测[J].中国超声医学杂志201430(9):824-826.
[13]
Allon M. Vascular access for hemodialysis patients: new data should guide decision making[J].Clin J Am Soc Nephrol201914(6):954-961.
[14]
靖永胜,王小平,刘芳,等.动静脉内瘘功能障碍病理及发病机制的研究进展[J].中华肾脏病杂志201733(4):318-320.
[15]
Zhao J, Jourd'heuil FL, Xue M, et al. Dual function for mature vascular smooth muscle cells during arteriovenous fistula remodeling[J].J Am Heart Assoc20176(4):e004891.
[16]
刘文渊,王敏,刘玉东,等.超声影像学评价高通量血液透析改善尿毒症患者左心室功能的价值[J/CD].中华诊断学电子杂志20153(1):32-35.
[17]
Pasquale Z, Fulvio F, Alessandro D,et al.Color Doppler ultrasound and arteriovenous fifistulas for hemodialysis[J].J Ultrasound201417(4):253-263.
[18]
Kwun KB, Schanzer H, Finkler N,et al.Hemodynamic evaluation of angioaccess procedures for hemodialysis[J].Vasc Endovasc Surg197913(3):170-177.
[19]
Jennings WC, Mallios A, Mushtaq N.Proximal radial artery arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis vascular access[J].J Vasc Surg201867(1):244-253.
[20]
Cildag BM, Koseoglu KOF.Discriminative role of brachial artery Doppler parameters in correlation with hemodialysis arteriovenous fifistula[J].Clujul Med201790(4):407-410.
[21]
Murakami M, Sakaguchi G, Mori N.Arteriovenous fistula combined with brachial artery superficialization is effective in patients with a high risk of maturation failure[J].J Vasc Surg201765(2):452-458.
[22]
Moreno Sánchez T, Martín Hervás C, Sola Martínez E,et al.Value of doppler ultrasonography in the study of hemodialysis peripheral vascular access dysfunction[J].Radiologia201456(5):420-428.
[23]
Abigail T, Tim H.Vascular ultrasound:how,why and when[M].3th ed.London:Churchill Livingstone,2010:305-311.
[24]
朱俊萍,明静,彭侃夫,等.超声流速比值法对血液透析动静脉内瘘狭窄的诊断价值[J].临床超声医学杂志201719(5):338-340.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[3] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[4] 陶宏宇, 叶菁菁, 俞劲, 杨秀珍, 钱晶晶, 徐彬, 徐玮泽, 舒强. 右心声学造影在儿童右向左分流相关疾病中的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 959-965.
[5] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[6] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[7] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[8] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[9] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[10] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[11] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[12] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[13] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[14] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[15] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
阅读次数
全文


摘要