切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 37 -41. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2023.01.008

临床研究

包皮口夹角和阴茎阴囊夹角在儿童先天性隐匿阴茎鉴别诊断中的应用
李圆1, 冯东川1, 朱孝宇1, 龚金超1, 韩涛1, 孙光耀1, 张习伦1,()   
  1. 1. 221006 徐州医科大学附属徐州儿童医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-15 出版日期:2023-02-26
  • 通信作者: 张习伦
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省高层次卫生人才"六个一工程"项目(LGY2019060)

Application of the foreskin angle and penis-scrotum angle in differential diagnosis of congenital concealed penis in children

Yuan Li1, Dongchuan Feng1, Xiaoyu Zhu1, Jinchao Gong1, Tao Han1, Guangyao Sun1, Xilun Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Xuzhou Children′s Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221006, China
  • Received:2022-02-15 Published:2023-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Xilun Zhang
引用本文:

李圆, 冯东川, 朱孝宇, 龚金超, 韩涛, 孙光耀, 张习伦. 包皮口夹角和阴茎阴囊夹角在儿童先天性隐匿阴茎鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 37-41.

Yuan Li, Dongchuan Feng, Xiaoyu Zhu, Jinchao Gong, Tao Han, Guangyao Sun, Xilun Zhang. Application of the foreskin angle and penis-scrotum angle in differential diagnosis of congenital concealed penis in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(01): 37-41.

目的

探讨包皮口夹角和阴茎阴囊夹角评价指标在儿童先天性隐匿阴茎鉴别诊断中的作用。

方法

收集2016年9月至2020年9月徐州医科大学附属徐州儿童医院泌尿外科接诊的106例单纯包茎和102例先天性隐匿阴茎患儿资料,每组根据年龄又可分为<6岁组、6~12岁组、>12岁组,单纯包茎组<6岁30例、6~12岁45例、>12岁31例,先天性隐匿阴茎组<6岁40例、6~12岁32例、>12岁30例。分别测量各组患儿的包皮口夹角和阴茎阴囊夹角,并进行比较。

结果

先天性隐匿阴茎组和单纯包茎组的包皮口夹角分别为60.00(45.00,78.50)°、5.00(0.00,10.00)°,差异有统计学意义(Z=12.50,P<0.01);阴茎阴囊夹角分别为115.00(110.00,120.00)°、30.00(0.00,46.50)°,差异有统计学意义(Z=12.47,P<0.01)。先天性隐匿阴茎组<6岁组、6~12岁组、>12岁组的包皮口夹角分别为75.50(60.00,88.75)°、68.00(50.00,79.50)°、45.00(35.00,56.25)°,差异有统计学意义(F=25.34,P<0.01);阴茎阴囊夹角分别为120.00(115.00,125.75)°、118.00(110.00,120.75)°、110.00(103.00,111.00)°,差异有统计学意义(F=34.32,P<0.01)。单纯包茎组<6岁组、6~12岁组、>12岁组的包皮口夹角分别为5.00(0.00,10.00)°、5.00(0.00,10.00)°、5.00(0.00,10.00)°,差异无统计学意义(F=0.14,P>0.05);阴茎阴囊夹角分别为38.50(20.00,60.00)°、30.00(0.00,49.00)°、20.00(0.00,40.00)°,差异有统计学意义(F=5.00,P<0.01)。

结论

包皮口夹角和阴茎阴囊夹角显著差异可应用于隐匿阴茎的鉴别诊断,协助明确病因并指导治疗。

Objective

To introduce the application of the foreskin angle and penis-scrotum angle in differential diagnosis of congenitally concealed penis in children.

Methods

From September 2016 to September 2020, data from 106 cases of phimosis and 102 cases of congenital concealed penis from Xuzhou Children′s Hospital affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University were compiled. Each age group could be separated into 3 categories: under 6 years old, 6-12 years old, and over 12 years old. Of the phimosis cases, 30 were under the age of six, 45 were between the ages of 6 and 12, and 31 were over the age of 12. In the congenital concealed penis group, 40 cases were under the age of 6, 32 cases were between the ages of 6 and 12, and 30 cases were over the age of 12. The children′s foreskin angle and penis-scrotum angle were both measured and compared.

Results

The foreskin angle was 60.00(45.00, 78.50)° in the congenital concealed penis group and 5.00(0.00, 10.00)° in the phimosis group, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=12.50, P<0.01). Penis-scrotum angles were 115.00(110.00, 120.00)° and 30.00(0.00, 46.50)° in the two groups, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (Z=12.47, P<0.01). In the congenital concealed penis group, the foreskin angle was 75.50(60.00, 88.75)°, 68.00(50.00, 79.50)°, and 45.00(35.00, 56.25)° in different age groups, with a statistically significant difference (F=25.34, P<0.01). Penis-scrotum angles were 120.00(115.00, 125.75)°, 118.00(110.00, 120.75)°, and 110.00(103.00, 111.00)° in different age groups, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (F=34.32, P<0.01). In the phimosis group, the foreskin angle was 5.00(0.00, 10.00)°, 5.00(0.00, 10.00)°, and 5.00(0.00, 10.00)° in various age groups, with no significant difference (F=0.14, P>0.05). The penis-scrotum angle were 38.50(20.00, 60.00)°, 30.00(0.00, 49.00)° and 20.00(0.00, 40.00)° in different age groups, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (F=5.00, P<0.01).

Conclusion

Significant difference of the foreskin angle and penis-scrotum angle can be used in the differential diagnosis of concealed penis to help identify the etiology and guide the treatment.

图1 先天性隐匿阴茎患儿和单纯包茎患儿包皮口夹角测量图像注:a图为先天性隐匿阴茎患儿包皮口夹角,为61°;b图为单纯包茎患儿包皮口夹角,为6°(白色箭头所示)
图2 先天性隐匿阴茎患儿和单纯包茎患儿阴茎阴囊夹角测量图像注:a图为先天性隐匿阴茎患儿阴茎阴囊夹角,为117°;b图为单纯包茎患儿阴茎阴囊夹角,为51°(白色箭头所示)
表1 先天性隐匿阴茎组与单纯包茎组患儿包皮口夹角及阴茎阴囊夹角比较[M(P25P75)]
表2 两组不同年龄段患儿包皮口夹角和阴茎阴囊夹角比较[°,M(P25P75)]
[1]
Zampieri N, Camoglio F.Pediatric-adolescent andrology:single centre experience[J].Arch Ital Urol Androl202092(2).DOI:10.4081/aiua.2020.2.97.
[2]
Marra G, Drury A, Tran L,et al.Systematic review of surgical and nonsurgical interventions in normal men complaining of small penis size[J].Sex Med Rev20208(1):158-180.DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.01.004.
[3]
Jun MS, Gallegos MA, Santucci RA.Contemporary management of adult-acquired buried penis[J].BJU Int2018122(4):713-715.DOI:10.1111/bju.14230.
[4]
李圆,朱孝宇,冯东川,等.儿童隐匿阴茎分型诊疗的临床探讨[J].中华小儿外科杂志201637(5):370-373.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2016.05.011.
[5]
李刚,李爽,游嘉,等.阴茎腹侧Z形交叉皮瓣与阴茎背侧带蒂转移皮瓣在小儿阴茎成形术中的疗效比较[J].中华泌尿外科杂志202142(5):365-369.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20200221-00099.
[6]
Alan JW, Louis RK, Alan WP,et al.Campbell-Walsh Urology[M].Netherland:ELSEVIER,2016:3374-3375.
[7]
Chevrot A, Droupy S.Cosmetic surgery of the penis[J].Rev Prat201767(6):623-627.
[8]
Mirastschijski U.Classification and treatment of the adult buried penis[J].Ann Plast Surg201880(6):653-659.DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000001574.
[9]
Maizels M, Meade P, Rosoklija I,et al.Outcome of circumcision for newborns with penoscrotal web: oblique skin incision followed by penis shaft skin physical therapy shows success[J].J Pediatr Urol201915(4):404.e1-404.e8.DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.05.021.
[10]
Zampieri N, Camoglio F.Pediatric-adolescent andrology:single centre experience[J].Arch Ital Urol Androl202092(2):97-101.DOI:10.4081/aiua.2020.2.97.
[11]
Smith-Harrison LI, Piotrowski J, Machen GL, et al. Acquired buried penis in adults:a review of surgical management[J].Sex Med Rev20208(1):150-157.DOI:10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.02.008.
[12]
郭俊斌,仲宇,汪锋.改良Brisson术治疗儿童隐匿性阴茎[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志201732(11):825-827.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2017.11.008.
[13]
齐灿,张铁军,褚登伟,等. "纽扣法"带蒂岛状包皮背侧皮瓣转移术在儿童重型隐匿阴茎的应用[J].中华小儿外科杂志202142(4):345-349.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20200130-00045.
[14]
李圆,朱孝宇,冯东川,等.隐匿性阴茎矫治术后阴茎背伸包扎法的效果评价[J].中华整形外科杂志202137(3):304-308.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20191202-00363.
[15]
Spinoit AF, Van Praet C, Groen LA, et al. Congenital penile pathology is associated with abnormal development of the dartos muscle:a prospective study of primary penile surgery at a tertiary referral center[J].J Urol2015193(5):1620-1624.DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.090.
[1] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[2] 蒋佳纯, 王晓冰, 陈培荣, 许世豪. 血清学指标联合常规超声及超声造影评分诊断原发性干燥综合征的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 622-630.
[3] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[4] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[5] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[6] 杨雪, 张伟, 尚培中, 宋创业, 尚丹丹, 张蔚. 胆囊十二指肠瘘结石经瘘口排出后自愈一例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 707-708.
[7] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[8] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[9] 许丁伟, 马江云, 李新成, 黄洁. Alagille综合征疑诊为先天性胆道闭锁一例并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 681-687.
[10] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[11] 杨红杰, 张智春, 孙轶. 直肠癌淋巴结转移诊断研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 512-518.
[12] 赵立力, 王魁向, 张小冲, 李志远. 血沉与C-反应蛋白比值在假体周围感染中的诊断价值分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 351-355.
[13] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
[14] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[15] 周婷, 孙培培, 张二明, 安欣华, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断现状调查[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 790-797.
阅读次数
全文


摘要