切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华诊断学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 37 -41. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2023.01.008

临床研究

包皮口夹角和阴茎阴囊夹角在儿童先天性隐匿阴茎鉴别诊断中的应用
李圆1, 冯东川1, 朱孝宇1, 龚金超1, 韩涛1, 孙光耀1, 张习伦1,()   
  1. 1. 221006 徐州医科大学附属徐州儿童医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-15 出版日期:2023-02-26
  • 通信作者: 张习伦
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省高层次卫生人才"六个一工程"项目(LGY2019060)

Application of the foreskin angle and penis-scrotum angle in differential diagnosis of congenital concealed penis in children

Yuan Li1, Dongchuan Feng1, Xiaoyu Zhu1, Jinchao Gong1, Tao Han1, Guangyao Sun1, Xilun Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Xuzhou Children′s Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221006, China
  • Received:2022-02-15 Published:2023-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Xilun Zhang
引用本文:

李圆, 冯东川, 朱孝宇, 龚金超, 韩涛, 孙光耀, 张习伦. 包皮口夹角和阴茎阴囊夹角在儿童先天性隐匿阴茎鉴别诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 37-41.

Yuan Li, Dongchuan Feng, Xiaoyu Zhu, Jinchao Gong, Tao Han, Guangyao Sun, Xilun Zhang. Application of the foreskin angle and penis-scrotum angle in differential diagnosis of congenital concealed penis in children[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(01): 37-41.

目的

探讨包皮口夹角和阴茎阴囊夹角评价指标在儿童先天性隐匿阴茎鉴别诊断中的作用。

方法

收集2016年9月至2020年9月徐州医科大学附属徐州儿童医院泌尿外科接诊的106例单纯包茎和102例先天性隐匿阴茎患儿资料,每组根据年龄又可分为<6岁组、6~12岁组、>12岁组,单纯包茎组<6岁30例、6~12岁45例、>12岁31例,先天性隐匿阴茎组<6岁40例、6~12岁32例、>12岁30例。分别测量各组患儿的包皮口夹角和阴茎阴囊夹角,并进行比较。

结果

先天性隐匿阴茎组和单纯包茎组的包皮口夹角分别为60.00(45.00,78.50)°、5.00(0.00,10.00)°,差异有统计学意义(Z=12.50,P<0.01);阴茎阴囊夹角分别为115.00(110.00,120.00)°、30.00(0.00,46.50)°,差异有统计学意义(Z=12.47,P<0.01)。先天性隐匿阴茎组<6岁组、6~12岁组、>12岁组的包皮口夹角分别为75.50(60.00,88.75)°、68.00(50.00,79.50)°、45.00(35.00,56.25)°,差异有统计学意义(F=25.34,P<0.01);阴茎阴囊夹角分别为120.00(115.00,125.75)°、118.00(110.00,120.75)°、110.00(103.00,111.00)°,差异有统计学意义(F=34.32,P<0.01)。单纯包茎组<6岁组、6~12岁组、>12岁组的包皮口夹角分别为5.00(0.00,10.00)°、5.00(0.00,10.00)°、5.00(0.00,10.00)°,差异无统计学意义(F=0.14,P>0.05);阴茎阴囊夹角分别为38.50(20.00,60.00)°、30.00(0.00,49.00)°、20.00(0.00,40.00)°,差异有统计学意义(F=5.00,P<0.01)。

结论

包皮口夹角和阴茎阴囊夹角显著差异可应用于隐匿阴茎的鉴别诊断,协助明确病因并指导治疗。

Objective

To introduce the application of the foreskin angle and penis-scrotum angle in differential diagnosis of congenitally concealed penis in children.

Methods

From September 2016 to September 2020, data from 106 cases of phimosis and 102 cases of congenital concealed penis from Xuzhou Children′s Hospital affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University were compiled. Each age group could be separated into 3 categories: under 6 years old, 6-12 years old, and over 12 years old. Of the phimosis cases, 30 were under the age of six, 45 were between the ages of 6 and 12, and 31 were over the age of 12. In the congenital concealed penis group, 40 cases were under the age of 6, 32 cases were between the ages of 6 and 12, and 30 cases were over the age of 12. The children′s foreskin angle and penis-scrotum angle were both measured and compared.

Results

The foreskin angle was 60.00(45.00, 78.50)° in the congenital concealed penis group and 5.00(0.00, 10.00)° in the phimosis group, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=12.50, P<0.01). Penis-scrotum angles were 115.00(110.00, 120.00)° and 30.00(0.00, 46.50)° in the two groups, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (Z=12.47, P<0.01). In the congenital concealed penis group, the foreskin angle was 75.50(60.00, 88.75)°, 68.00(50.00, 79.50)°, and 45.00(35.00, 56.25)° in different age groups, with a statistically significant difference (F=25.34, P<0.01). Penis-scrotum angles were 120.00(115.00, 125.75)°, 118.00(110.00, 120.75)°, and 110.00(103.00, 111.00)° in different age groups, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (F=34.32, P<0.01). In the phimosis group, the foreskin angle was 5.00(0.00, 10.00)°, 5.00(0.00, 10.00)°, and 5.00(0.00, 10.00)° in various age groups, with no significant difference (F=0.14, P>0.05). The penis-scrotum angle were 38.50(20.00, 60.00)°, 30.00(0.00, 49.00)° and 20.00(0.00, 40.00)° in different age groups, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (F=5.00, P<0.01).

Conclusion

Significant difference of the foreskin angle and penis-scrotum angle can be used in the differential diagnosis of concealed penis to help identify the etiology and guide the treatment.

图1 先天性隐匿阴茎患儿和单纯包茎患儿包皮口夹角测量图像注:a图为先天性隐匿阴茎患儿包皮口夹角,为61°;b图为单纯包茎患儿包皮口夹角,为6°(白色箭头所示)
图2 先天性隐匿阴茎患儿和单纯包茎患儿阴茎阴囊夹角测量图像注:a图为先天性隐匿阴茎患儿阴茎阴囊夹角,为117°;b图为单纯包茎患儿阴茎阴囊夹角,为51°(白色箭头所示)
表1 先天性隐匿阴茎组与单纯包茎组患儿包皮口夹角及阴茎阴囊夹角比较[M(P25P75)]
表2 两组不同年龄段患儿包皮口夹角和阴茎阴囊夹角比较[°,M(P25P75)]
[1]
Zampieri N, Camoglio F.Pediatric-adolescent andrology:single centre experience[J].Arch Ital Urol Androl202092(2).DOI:10.4081/aiua.2020.2.97.
[2]
Marra G, Drury A, Tran L,et al.Systematic review of surgical and nonsurgical interventions in normal men complaining of small penis size[J].Sex Med Rev20208(1):158-180.DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.01.004.
[3]
Jun MS, Gallegos MA, Santucci RA.Contemporary management of adult-acquired buried penis[J].BJU Int2018122(4):713-715.DOI:10.1111/bju.14230.
[4]
李圆,朱孝宇,冯东川,等.儿童隐匿阴茎分型诊疗的临床探讨[J].中华小儿外科杂志201637(5):370-373.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2016.05.011.
[5]
李刚,李爽,游嘉,等.阴茎腹侧Z形交叉皮瓣与阴茎背侧带蒂转移皮瓣在小儿阴茎成形术中的疗效比较[J].中华泌尿外科杂志202142(5):365-369.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20200221-00099.
[6]
Alan JW, Louis RK, Alan WP,et al.Campbell-Walsh Urology[M].Netherland:ELSEVIER,2016:3374-3375.
[7]
Chevrot A, Droupy S.Cosmetic surgery of the penis[J].Rev Prat201767(6):623-627.
[8]
Mirastschijski U.Classification and treatment of the adult buried penis[J].Ann Plast Surg201880(6):653-659.DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000001574.
[9]
Maizels M, Meade P, Rosoklija I,et al.Outcome of circumcision for newborns with penoscrotal web: oblique skin incision followed by penis shaft skin physical therapy shows success[J].J Pediatr Urol201915(4):404.e1-404.e8.DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.05.021.
[10]
Zampieri N, Camoglio F.Pediatric-adolescent andrology:single centre experience[J].Arch Ital Urol Androl202092(2):97-101.DOI:10.4081/aiua.2020.2.97.
[11]
Smith-Harrison LI, Piotrowski J, Machen GL, et al. Acquired buried penis in adults:a review of surgical management[J].Sex Med Rev20208(1):150-157.DOI:10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.02.008.
[12]
郭俊斌,仲宇,汪锋.改良Brisson术治疗儿童隐匿性阴茎[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志201732(11):825-827.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2017.11.008.
[13]
齐灿,张铁军,褚登伟,等. "纽扣法"带蒂岛状包皮背侧皮瓣转移术在儿童重型隐匿阴茎的应用[J].中华小儿外科杂志202142(4):345-349.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20200130-00045.
[14]
李圆,朱孝宇,冯东川,等.隐匿性阴茎矫治术后阴茎背伸包扎法的效果评价[J].中华整形外科杂志202137(3):304-308.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20191202-00363.
[15]
Spinoit AF, Van Praet C, Groen LA, et al. Congenital penile pathology is associated with abnormal development of the dartos muscle:a prospective study of primary penile surgery at a tertiary referral center[J].J Urol2015193(5):1620-1624.DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.090.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 唐金侨, 叶宇佳, 王港, 赵彬, 马艳宁. 医学影像学检查方法在颞下颌关节紊乱病中临床应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 406-411.
[3] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[4] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[5] 熊鹰, 林敬莱, 白奇, 郭剑明, 王烁. 肾癌自动化病理诊断:AI离临床还有多远?[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 535-540.
[6] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[7] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[8] 王秋生. 胆道良性疾病诊疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 779-782.
[9] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[10] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
[11] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[12] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[13] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
[14] 胡云鹤, 周玉焯, 付瑞瑛, 于凡, 李爱东. CHS-DRG付费制度下GB1分组住院费用影响因素分析与管理策略探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 568-574.
[15] 俞悦, 王缘, 桑穆惠, 时钦. 基于眩晕病病机证素辨证诊断量表分析眩晕病病机证素分布规律[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 454-458.
阅读次数
全文


摘要